Infected and deformed neuropathic feet and ankles are serious challenges for surgical management. In this study we present our experience in performing ankle arthrodesis in a closed manner, without surgical preparation of the joint surfaces by cartilaginous debridement, but instead using an Ilizarov ring fixator (IRF) for deformity correction and facilitating fusion, in arthritic neuropathic ankles with associated osteomyelitis. We retrospectively reviewed all the patients who underwent closed ankle arthrodesis (CAA) in Ilizarov Scientific Centre from 2013 to 2018 (Group A) and compared them with a similar group of patients (Group B) who underwent open ankle arthrodesis (OAA). We then divided the neuropathic patients into three arthritic subgroups: Charcot joint, Charcot-Maire-Tooth disease, and post-traumatic arthritis. All arthrodeses were performed by using an Ilizarov ring fixator. All patients were followed up clinically and radiologically for a minimum of 12 months to assess union and function.Aims
Methods
Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion is used to treat a variety of conditions affecting the ankle and subtalar joint, including osteoarthritis (OA), Charcot arthropathy, avascular necrosis (AVN) of the talus, failed total ankle arthroplasty, and severe deformity. The prevalence of postoperative complications remains high due to the complexity of hindfoot disease seen in these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between preoperative conditions and postoperative complications in order to predict the outcome following primary TTC fusion. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 101 patients who underwent TTC fusion at the same institution between 2011 and 2019. Risk ratios (RRs) associated with age, sex, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, smoking, preoperative ankle deformity, and the use of bone graft during surgery were related to the postoperative complications. We determined from these data which pre- and perioperative factors significantly affected the outcome.Aims
Methods
Various radiological parameters are used to evaluate a flatfoot
deformity and their measurements may differ. The aims of this study
were to answer the following questions: 1) Which of the 11 parameters
have the best inter- and intraobserver reliability in a standardized
radiological setting? 2) Are pre- and postoperative assessments
equally reliable? 3) What are the identifiable sources of variation? Measurements of the 11 parameters were recorded on anteroposterior
and lateral weight-bearing radiographs of 38 feet before and after
surgery for flatfoot, by three observers with different experience
in foot surgery (A, ten years; B, three years; C, third-year orthopaedic
resident). The inter- and intraobserver reliability was calculated.Aims
Patients and Methods
The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is a validated
16-item, patient-reported outcome measure for evaluating outcomes
of foot or ankle surgery. The original development of the instrument
identified three domains. This present study examined whether the
three domains could legitimately be summed to provide a single summary
index score. The MOXFQ and Short-Form (SF)-36 were administered to 671 patients
before surgery of the foot or ankle. Data from the three domains
of the MOXFQ (pain, walking/standing and social interaction) were
subjected to higher order factor analysis. Reliability and validity
of the summary index score was assessed.Objectives
Methods
In a retrospective study we compared 32 HINTEGRA
total ankle replacements (TARs) and 35 Mobility TARs performed between
July 2005 and May 2010, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The
mean follow-up for the HINTEGRA group was 53 months (24 to 76) and
for the Mobility group was 34 months (24 to 45). All procedures
were performed by a single surgeon. There was no significant difference between the two groups with
regard to the mean AOFAS score, visual analogue score for pain or
range of movement of the ankle at the latest follow-up. Most radiological
measurements did not differ significantly between the two groups.
However, the most common grade of heterotopic ossification (HO)
was grade 3 in the HINTEGRA group (10 of 13 TARs, 76.9%) and grade
2 in the Mobility group (four of seven TARs, 57.1%) (p = 0.025).
Although HO was more frequent in the HINTEGRA group (40.6%) than
in the Mobility group (20.0%), this was not statistically significant
(p = 0.065).The difference in peri-operative complications between
the two groups was not significant, but intra-operative medial malleolar
fractures occurred in four (11.4%) in the Mobility group; four (12.5%)
in the HINTEGRA group and one TAR (2.9%) in the Mobility group failed
(p = 0.185). Cite this article:
