The aim of this study was to examine the results of the acetabular
distraction technique in achieving implantation of a stable construct,
obtaining biological fixation, and producing healing of chronic
pelvic discontinuity at revision total hip arthroplasty. We identified 32 patients treated between 2006 and 2013 who underwent
acetabular revision for a chronic pelvic discontinuity using acetabular
distraction, and who were radiographically evaluated at a mean of
62 months (25 to 160). Of these patients, 28 (87.5%) were female.
The mean age at the time of revision was 67 years (44 to 86). The patients
represented a continuous series drawn from two institutions that
adhered to an identical operative technique.Aims
Patients and Methods
Acetabular bone loss is a challenging problem
facing the revision total hip replacement surgeon. Reconstruction
of the acetabulum depends on the presence of anterosuperior and
posteroinferior pelvic column support for component fixation and
stability. The Paprosky classification is most commonly used when
determining the location and degree of acetabular bone loss. Augments
serve the function of either providing primary construct stability
or supplementary fixation. When a pelvic discontinuity is encountered we advocate the use
of an acetabular distraction technique with a jumbo cup and modular
porous metal acetabular augments for the treatment of severe acetabular
bone loss and associated chronic pelvic discontinuity. Cite this article:
We evaluated all cases involving the combined use of a subtrochanteric derotational femoral shortening osteotomy with a cemented Exeter stem performed at our institution. With severe developmental dysplasia of the hip an osteotomy is often necessary to achieve shortening and derotation of the proximal femur. Reduction can be maintained with a 3.5 mm compression plate while the implant is cemented into place. Such a plate was used to stabilise the osteotomy in all cases. Intramedullary autograft helps to prevent cement interposition at the osteotomy site and promotes healing. There were 15 female patients (18 hips) with a mean age of 51 years (33 to 75) who had a Crowe IV dysplasia of the hip and were followed up for a mean of 114 months (52 to 168). None was lost to follow-up. All clinical scores were collected prospectively. The Charnley modification of the Merle D’Aubigné-Postel scores for pain, function and range of movement showed a statistically significant improvement from a mean of 2.4 (1 to 4), 2.3 (1 to 4), 3.4 (1 to 6) to 5.2 (3 to 6), 4.4 (3 to 6), 5.2 (4 to 6), respectively. Three acetabular revisions were required for aseptic loosening; one required femoral revision for access. One osteotomy failed to unite at 14 months and was revised successfully. No other case required a femoral revision. No postoperative sciatic nerve palsy was observed. Cemented Exeter femoral components perform well in the treatment of Crowe IV dysplasia with this procedure.
We describe the experience with the first consecutive 230 Birmingham hip resurfacings at our centre. At a mean follow-up of three years (25 to 52 months) survivorship was 99.14% with revision in one patient for a loose acetabular component and one death from unrelated causes. One patient developed a fracture of the femoral neck at six weeks which united unremarkably after a period of non-weight-bearing. The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 62.54 (8 to 92) to 97.74 (61 to 100). The mean flexion improved from 91.52° (25 to 140) to 110.41° (80 to 145). Most patients (97%) considered the outcome to be good or excellent. Our preliminary experience with this implant is encouraging and the results are superior to the earlier generation of resurfacings for the same length of follow-up.
