Proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacements (PFEPRs) are the most common reconstruction option for osseous defects following primary and metastatic tumour resection. This study aimed to compare the rate of implant failure between PFEPRs with monopolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties and acetabular arthroplasties, and determine the optimum articulation for revision PFEPRs. This is a retrospective review of 233 patients who underwent PFEPR. The mean age was 54.7 years (SD 18.2), and 99 (42.5%) were male. There were 90 patients with primary bone tumours (38.6%), 122 with metastatic bone disease (52.4%), and 21 with haematological malignancy (9.0%). A total of 128 patients had monopolar (54.9%), 74 had bipolar hemiarthroplasty heads (31.8%), and 31 underwent acetabular arthroplasty (13.3%).Aims
Methods
Dislocation rates are reportedly lower in patients requiring
proximal femoral hemiarthroplasty than for patients undergoing hip
arthroplasty for neoplasia. Without acetabular replacement, pain
due to acetabular wear necessitating revision surgery has been described.
We aimed to determine whether wear of the native acetabulum following
hemiarthroplasty necessitates revision surgery with secondary replacement
of the acetabulum after proximal femoral replacement (PFR) for tumour
reconstruction. We reviewed 100 consecutive PFRs performed between January 2003
and January 2013 without acetabular resurfacing. The procedure was
undertaken in 74 patients with metastases, for a primary bone tumour
in 20 and for myeloma in six. There were 48 male and 52 female patients,
with a mean age of 61.4 years (19 to 85) and median follow-up of
two years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.5 to 3.7 years). In total,
52 patients presented with a pathological fracture and six presented
with failed fixation of a previously instrumented pathological fracture.Aims
Patients and Methods
