National hip fracture registries audit similar aspects of care but there is variation in the actual data collected; these differences restrict international comparison, benchmarking, and research. The Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) published a revised minimum common dataset (MCD) in 2022 to improve consistency and interoperability. Our aim was to assess compatibility of existing registries with the MCD. We compared 17 hip fracture registries covering 20 countries (Argentina; Australia and New Zealand; China; Denmark; England, Wales, and Northern Ireland; Germany; Holland; Ireland; Japan; Mexico; Norway; Pakistan; the Philippines; Scotland; South Korea; Spain; and Sweden), setting each of these against the 20 core and 12 optional fields of the MCD.Aims
Methods
Hip fracture commonly affects the frailest patients, of whom many are care-dependent, with a disproportionate risk of contracting COVID-19. We examined the impact of COVID-19 infection on hip fracture mortality in England. We conducted a cohort study of patients with hip fracture recorded in the National Hip Fracture Database between 1 February 2019 and 31 October 2020 in England. Data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics to quantify patient characteristics and comorbidities, Office for National Statistics mortality data, and Public Health England’s SARS-CoV-2 testing results. Multivariable Cox regression examined determinants of 90-day mortality. Excess mortality attributable to COVID-19 was quantified using Quasi-Poisson models.Aims
Methods
There is not adequate evidence to establish whether external
fixation (EF) of pelvic fractures leads to a reduced mortality.
We used the Japan Trauma Data Bank database to identify isolated
unstable pelvic ring fractures to exclude the possibility of blood
loss from other injuries, and analyzed the effectiveness of EF on
mortality in this group of patients. This was a registry-based comparison of 1163 patients who had
been treated for an isolated unstable pelvic ring fracture with
(386 patients) or without (777 patients) EF. An isolated pelvic
ring fracture was defined by an Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) for
other injuries of <
3. An unstable pelvic ring fracture was defined
as having an AIS ≥ 4. The primary outcome of this study was mortality.
A subgroup analysis was carried out for patients who required blood
transfusion within 24 hours of arrival in the Emergency Department
and those who had massive blood loss (AIS code: 852610.5). Propensity-score
matching was used to identify a cohort like the EF and non-EF groups.Aim
Patients and Methods
We compared a new fixation system, the Targon
Femoral Neck (TFN) hip screw, with the current standard treatment of
cannulated screw fixation. This was a single-centre, participant-blinded,
randomised controlled trial. Patients aged 65 years and over with
either a displaced or undisplaced intracapsular fracture of the
hip were eligible. The primary outcome was the risk of revision
surgery within one year of fixation. A total of 174 participants were included in the trial. The absolute
reduction in risk of revision was of 4.7% (95% CI 14.2 to 22.5)
in favour of the TFN hip screw (chi-squared test, p = 0.741), which
was less than the pre-specified level of minimum clinically important
difference. There were no significant differences in any of the
secondary outcome measures. We found no evidence of a clinical difference in the risk of
revision surgery between the TFN hip screw and cannulated screw
fixation for patients with an intracapsular fracture of the hip. Cite this article:
