Achieving accurate implant positioning and restoring native hip biomechanics are key surgeon-controlled technical objectives in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary objective of this study was to compare the reproducibility of the planned preoperative centre of hip rotation (COR) in patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted THA versus conventional THA. This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) included 60 patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis undergoing conventional THA (CO THA) versus robotic arm-assisted THA (RO THA). Patients in both arms underwent pre- and postoperative CT scans, and a patient-specific plan was created using the robotic software. The COR, combined offset, acetabular orientation, and leg length discrepancy were measured on the pre- and postoperative CT scanogram at six weeks following surgery.Aims
Methods
Ideal placement of the acetabular component remains
elusive both in terms of defining and achieving a target. Our aim
is to help restore original anatomy by using the transverse acetabular
ligament (TAL) to control the height, depth and version of the component.
In the normal hip the TAL and labrum extend beyond the equator of
the femoral head and therefore, if the definitive acetabular component
is positioned such that it is cradled by and just deep to the plane
of the TAL and labrum and is no more than 4mm larger than the original
femoral head, the centre of the hip should be restored. If the face
of the component is positioned parallel to the TAL and psoas groove
the patient specific version should be restored. We still use the
TAL for controlling version in the dysplastic hip because we believe
that the TAL and labrum compensate for any underlying bony abnormality. The TAL should not be used as an aid to inclination. Worldwide,
>
75% of surgeons operate with the patient in the lateral decubitus
position and we have shown that errors in post-operative radiographic
inclination (RI) of >
50° are generally caused by errors in patient positioning.
Consequently, great care needs to be taken when positioning the
patient. We also recommend 35° of apparent operative inclination
(AOI) during surgery, as opposed to the traditional 45°. Cite this article:
