Aims.
Permanent growth arrest of the longer bone is
an option in the treatment of minor leg-length discrepancies. The
use of a tension band plating technique to produce a temporary epiphysiodesis
is appealing as it avoids the need for accurate timing of the procedure
in relation to remaining growth. We performed an animal study to
establish if control of growth in a long bone is possible with tension
band plating. Animals (pigs) were randomised to temporary epiphysiodesis
on either the right or left tibia. Implants were removed after ten
weeks. Both tibiae were examined using MRI at baseline, and after
ten and 15 weeks. The median interphyseal distance was significantly shorter
on the treated tibiae after both ten weeks (p = 0.04) and 15 weeks
(p = 0.04). On T. 1. -weighted images the metaphyseal water
content was significantly reduced after ten weeks on the treated
side (p = 0.04) but returned to values comparable with the untreated
side at 15 weeks (p = 0.14). Return of growth was observed in all
animals after removal of implants.
Eight-plates are used to correct varus-valgus deformity (VVD) or limb-length discrepancy (LLD) in children and adolescents. It was reported that these implants might create a bony deformity within the knee joint by change of the roof angle (RA) after epiphysiodesis of the proximal tibia following a radiological assessment limited to anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. The aim of this study was to analyze the RA, complemented with lateral knee radiographs, with focus on the tibial slope (TS) and the degree of deformity correction. A retrospective, single-centre study was conducted. The treatment group (n = 64 knees in 44 patients) was subclassified according to the implant location in two groups: 1) medial hemiepiphysiodesis; and 2) lateral hemiepiphysiodesis. A third control group consisted of 25 untreated knees. The limb axes and RA were measured on long standing AP leg radiographs. Lateral radiographs of 40 knees were available for TS analysis. The mean age of the patients was 10.6 years (4 to 15) in the treatment group and 8.4 years (4 to 14) in the control group. Implants were removed after a mean 1.2 years (0.5 to 3).Aims
Methods
Rebound growth after hemiepiphysiodesis may be
a normal event, but little is known about its causes, incidence
or factors related to its intensity. The aim of this study was to
evaluate rebound growth under controlled experimental conditions. A total of 22 six-week-old rabbits underwent a medial proximal
tibial hemiepiphysiodesis using a two-hole plate and screws. Temporal
growth plate arrest was maintained for three weeks, and animals
were killed at intervals ranging between three days and three weeks
after removal of the device. The radiological angulation of the proximal
tibia was studied at weekly intervals during and after hemiepiphysiodesis.
A histological study of the retrieved proximal physis of the tibia
was performed. The mean angulation achieved at three weeks was 34.7° (standard
deviation ( In our rabbit model, rebound was an event of variable incidence
and intensity and, when present, did not appear immediately after
restoration of growth, but took some time to appear. Cite this article:
Guiding growth by harnessing the ability of growing bone to undergo plastic deformation is one of the oldest orthopaedic principles. Correction of deformity remains a major part of the workload for paediatric orthopaedic surgeons and recently, along with developments in limb reconstruction and computer-directed frame correction, there has been renewed interest in surgical methods of physeal manipulation or ‘guided growth’. Manipulating natural bone growth to correct a deformity is appealing, as it allows gradual correction by non- or minimally invasive methods. This paper reviews the techniques employed for guided growth in current orthopaedic practice, including the basic science and recent advances underlying mechanical physeal manipulation of both healthy and pathological physes.