Over a five-year period, adult patients with
marginal impaction of acetabular fractures were identified from
a registry of patients who underwent acetabular reconstruction in
two tertiary referral centres. Fractures were classified according
to the system of Judet and Letournel. A topographic classification
to describe the extent of articular impaction was used, dividing
the joint surface into superior, middle and inferior thirds. Demographic information,
hospitalisation and surgery-related complications, functional (EuroQol
5-D) and radiological outcome according to Matta’s criteria were
recorded and analysed. In all, 60 patients (57 men, three women)
with a mean age of 41 years (18 to 72) were available at a mean
follow-up of 48 months (24 to 206). The quality of the reduction
was ‘anatomical’ in 44 hips (73.3%) and ‘imperfect’ in 16 (26.7%).
The originally achieved anatomical reduction was lost in Univariate linear regression analysis of the functional outcome
showed that factors associated with worse pain were increasing age
and an inferior location of the impaction. Elevation of the articular
impaction leads to joint preservation with satisfactory overall
medium-term functional results, but secondary collapse is likely
to occur in some patients. Cite this article:
Isolated fractures of the anterior column and anterior wall are a relatively rare subgroup of acetabular fractures. We report our experience of 30 consecutive cases treated over ten years. Open reduction and internal fixation through an ilioinguinal approach was performed for most of these cases (76.7%) and percutaneous techniques were used for the remainder. At a mean follow-up of four years (2 to 6), 26 were available for review. The radiological and functional outcomes were good or excellent in 23 of 30 patients (76.7%) and 22 of 26 patients (84.6%) according to Matta’s radiological criteria and the modified Merlé d’Aubigné score, respectively. Complications of minor to moderate severity were seen in six of the 30 cases (20%) and none of the patients underwent secondary surgery or replacement of the hip.
Failure of fixation is a common problem in the treatment of osteoporotic fractures around the hip. The reinforcement of bone stock or of fixation of the implant may be a solution. Our study assesses the existing evidence for the use of bone substitutes in the management of these fractures in osteoporotic patients. Relevant publications were retrieved through Medline research and further scrutinised. Of 411 studies identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 12 experimental and ten clinical reports. The clinical studies were evaluated with regard to their level of evidence. Only four were prospective and randomised. Polymethylmethacrylate and calcium-phosphate cements increased the primary stability of the implant-bone construct in all experimental and clinical studies, although there was considerable variation in the design of the studies. In randomised, controlled studies, augmentation of intracapsular fractures of the neck of the femur with calcium-phosphate cement was associated with poor long-term results. There was a lack of data on the long-term outcome for trochanteric fractures. Because there were only a few, randomised, controlled studies, there is currently poor evidence for the use of bone cement in the treatment of fractures of the hip.
We describe a patient in whom an initially intact sciatic nerve became rapidly encased in heterotopic bone formed in the abductor compartment after reconstruction of the posterior wall of the acetabulum following fracture. Prompt excision and neural release followed by irradiation and administration of indometacin resulted in a full neurological recovery and no recurrence 27 months later.
Modern principles for the treatment of open fractures include stabilisation of the bone and management of the soft tissues. Wound debridement and irrigation is thought to be the mainstay in reducing the incidence of infection. Although numerous studies on animals and humans have focused on the type of irrigation performed, little is known of the factors which influence irrigation. This paper evaluates the evidence, particularly with regard to additives and the mode of delivery of irrigation fluid. Normal saline should be used and although many antiseptics and antibiotics have been employed, no consensus has been reached as to the ideal additive. Despite the advocates of high-pressure methods highlighting the improved dilutional ability of such techniques, the results are inconclusive and these irrigation systems are not without complications. New systems for debridement are currently being investigated, and an ideal method has yet to be determined.