Degenerative problems of the hip in patients
with childhood and adult onset neuromuscular disorders can be challenging
to treat. Many orthopaedic surgeons are reluctant to recommend total
hip replacement (THR) for patients with underlying neuromuscular
disorders due to the perceived increased risks of dislocation, implant loosening,
and lack of information about the functional outcomes and potential
benefits of these procedures in these patients. Modular femoral
components and alternative bearings which facilitate the use of
large femoral heads, constrained acetabular components and perhaps
more importantly, a better understanding about the complications
and outcomes of THR in the patient with neuromuscular disorders,
make this option viable. This paper will review the current literature
and our experience with THR in the more frequently encountered neuromuscular
disorders. Cite this article:
This edition of Cochrane Corner looks at some of the work published by the Cochrane Collaboration, covering pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing definitive fixation or joint replacement for hip, pelvic, and long bone fractures; interventions for reducing red blood cell transfusion in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery: an overview of systematic reviews; and pharmacological treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews
The June 2024 Knee Roundup360 looks at: The estimated lifetime risk of revision after primary knee arthroplasty influenced by age, sex, and indication; Should high-risk patients seek out care from high-volume surgeons?; Stability and fracture rates in medial unicondylar knee arthroplasties; Rethinking antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures post-arthroplasty; Evaluating DAIR: a viable alternative for acute periprosthetic joint infection; The characteristics and predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures around the knee; Patient health-related quality of life deteriorates significantly while waiting six to 12 months for total hip or knee arthroplasty; The importance of looking for diversity in knee implants.
To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compares three treatments for acetabular fractures in older patients: surgical fixation, surgical fixation and hip arthroplasty (fix-and-replace), and non-surgical treatment. Patients were recruited from seven UK NHS centres and randomized to a three-arm pilot trial if aged older than 60 years and had a displaced acetabular fracture. Feasibility outcomes included patients’ willingness to participate, clinicians’ capability to recruit, and dropout rates. The primary clinical outcome measure was the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) at six months. Secondary outcomes were Oxford Hip Score, Disability Rating Index, blood loss, and radiological and mobility assessments.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of combined total joint arthroplasty (TJA) (total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed during the same admission) versus bilateral THA, bilateral TKA, single THA, and single TKA. Combined TJAs performed on the same day were compared with those staged within the same admission episode. Data from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample recorded between 2005 and 2014 were used for this retrospective cohort study. Postoperative in-hospital complications, total costs, and discharge destination were reviewed. Logistic and linear regression were used to perform the statistical analyses. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.Aims
Patients and Methods
Between 2002 and 2011, 81 patients with a traumatic total brachial
plexus injury underwent reconstruction by double free muscle transfer
(DFMT, 47 cases), single muscle transfer (SMT, 16 cases) or nerve
transfers (NT, 18 cases). They were evaluated for functional outcome and quality of life
(QoL) using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire,
both pre- and post-operatively. The three groups were compared and
followed-up for at least 24 months.Aims
Methods
In this paper, we will consider the current role
of simultaneous-bilateral TKA. Based on available evidence, it is
our opinion that bilateral one stage TKR is a safe and efficacious treatment
for patients with severe bilateral arthritic knee disease but should
be reserved for selected patients without significant medical comorbidities.
