Recent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs have featured more anatomical morphologies and shorter tibial keels. However, several reports have raised concerns about the impact of these modifications on implant longevity. The aim of this study was to report the early performance of a modern, cemented TKA design. All patients who received a primary, cemented TKA between 2012 and 2017 with a minimum two-year follow-up were included. The implant investigated features an asymmetrical tibial baseplate and shortened keel. Patient demographic details, Knee Society Scores (KSS), component alignment, and the presence of radiolucent lines at final follow-up were recorded. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to estimate survivorship.Aims
Methods
Disruption of the extensor mechanism in total
knee arthroplasty may occur by tubercle avulsion, patellar or quadriceps
tendon rupture, or patella fracture, and whether occurring intra-operatively
or post-operatively can be difficult to manage and is associated
with a significant rate of failure and associated complications.
This surgery is frequently performed in compromised tissues, and
repairs must frequently be protected with cerclage wiring and/or
augmentation with local tendon (semi-tendinosis, gracilis) which
may also be used to treat soft-tissue loss in the face of chronic
disruption. Quadriceps rupture may be treated with conservative
therapy if the patient retains active extension. Component loosening
or loss of active extension of 20° or greater are clear indications
for surgical treatment of patellar fracture. Acute patellar tendon
disruption may be treated by primary repair. Chronic extensor failure
is often complicated by tissue loss and retraction can be treated
with medial gastrocnemius flaps, achilles tendon allografts, and
complete extensor mechanism allografts. Attention to fixing the
graft in full extension is mandatory to prevent severe extensor
lag as the graft stretches out over time.
This conversation represents an attempt by several
arthroplasty surgeons to critique several abstracts presented over
the last year as well as to use them as a jumping off point for trying
to figure out where they fit in into our current understanding of
multiple issues in modern hip and knee arthroplasty.