Recently, the use of metal-on-metal articulations
in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has led to an increase in adverse
events owing to local soft-tissue reactions from metal ions and
wear debris. While the majority of these implants perform well,
it has been increasingly recognised that a small proportion of patients
may develop complications secondary to systemic cobalt toxicity
when these implants fail. However, distinguishing true toxicity
from benign elevations in cobalt ion levels can be challenging. The purpose of this two part series is to review the use of cobalt
alloys in THA and to highlight the following related topics of interest:
mechanisms of cobalt ion release and their measurement, definitions
of pathological cobalt ion levels, and the pathophysiology, risk factors
and treatment of cobalt toxicity. Historically, these metal-on-metal
arthroplasties are composed of a chromium-cobalt articulation. The release of cobalt is due to the mechanical and oxidative
stresses placed on the prosthetic joint. It exerts its pathological
effects through direct cellular toxicity. This manuscript will highlight the pathophysiology of cobalt
toxicity in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. Take home message: Patients with new or evolving hip symptoms
with a prior history of THA warrant orthopaedic surgical evaluation.
Increased awareness of the range of systemic symptoms associated
with cobalt toxicity, coupled with prompt orthopaedic intervention, may
forestall the development of further complications. Cite this article:
As adverse events related to metal on metal hip
arthroplasty have been better understood, there has been increased
interest in toxicity related to the high circulating levels of cobalt ions.
However, distinguishing true toxicity from benign elevations in
cobalt levels can be challenging. The purpose of this review is
to examine the use of cobalt alloys in total hip arthroplasty, to
review the methods of measuring circulating cobalt levels, to define
a level of cobalt which is considered pathological and to review
the pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment of cobalt toxicity.
To the best of our knowledge, there are 18 published cases where
cobalt metal ion toxicity has been attributed to the use of cobalt-chromium
alloys in hip arthroplasty. Of these cases, the great majority reported
systemic toxic reactions at serum cobalt levels more than 100 μg/L.
This review highlights some of the clinical features of cobalt toxicity,
with the goal that early awareness may decrease the risk factors
for the development of cobalt toxicity and/or reduce its severity. Take home message: Severe adverse events can arise from the release
of cobalt from metal-on-metal arthroplasties, and as such, orthopaedic
surgeons should not only be aware of the presenting problems, but
also have the knowledge to treat appropriately. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the
effect of various non-operative modalities of treatment (transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); neuromuscular electrical stimulation
(NMES); insoles and bracing) on the pain of osteoarthritis (OA)
of the knee. We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify
the therapeutic options which are commonly adopted for the management
of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The outcome measurement tools used in the different studies were
the visual analogue scale and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
Arthritis Index pain index: all pain scores were converted to a
100-point scale. A total of 30 studies met our inclusion criteria: 13 on insoles,
seven on TENS, six on NMES, and four on bracing. The standardised
mean difference (SMD) in pain after treatment with TENS was 1.796,
which represented a significant reduction in pain. The significant
overall effect estimate for NMES on pain was similar to that of
TENS, with a SMD of 1.924. The overall effect estimate of insoles
on pain was a SMD of 0.992. The overall effect of bracing showed
a significant reduction in pain of 1.34. Overall, all four non-operative modalities of treatment were
found to have a significant effect on the reduction of pain in OA
of the knee. This study shows that non-operative physical modalities of treatment
are of benefit when treating OA of the knee. However, much of the
literature reviewed evaluates studies with follow-up of less than
six months: future work should aim to evaluate patients with longer
follow-up. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to assess the effect
of injecting genetically engineered chondrocytes expressing transforming
growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) into the knees of patients with osteoarthritis.
We assessed the resultant function, pain and quality of life. A total of 54 patients (20 men, 34 women) who had a mean age
of 58 years (50 to 66) were blinded and randomised (1:1) to receive
a single injection of the active treatment or a placebo. We assessed
post-treatment function, pain severity, physical function, quality
of life and the incidence of treatment-associated adverse events. Patients
were followed at four, 12 and 24 weeks after injection. At final follow-up the treatment group had a significantly greater
improvement in the mean International Knee Documentation Committee
score than the placebo group (16 points; -18 to 49, This technique may result in improved clinical outcomes, with
the aim of slowing the degenerative process, leading to improvements
in pain and function. However, imaging and direct observational
studies are needed to verify cartilage regeneration. Nevertheless,
this study provided a sufficient basis to proceed to further clinical testing. Cite this article:
