We performed a randomised, prospective study of 80 mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties (80 knees) in order to measure the effects of varus-valgus laxity and balance on the range of movement (ROM) one year after operation. Forty knees had a posterior-cruciate-ligament (PCL)-retaining prosthesis and the other 40 a PCL-sacrificing prosthesis. In the balanced group (69 knees) in which the difference between varus and valgus was less than 2°, the mean ROM improved significantly from 107.6° to 117.7° (p <
0.0001). By contrast, in the 11 knees which were unbalanced and in which the difference between varus and valgus laxity exceeded 2°, the ROM decreased from a mean of 121.0° to 112.7° (p = 0.0061). We conclude that coronal laxity, especially balanced laxity, is important for achieving an improved ROM in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
We have previously reported the short-term radiological
results of a randomised controlled trial comparing kinematically
aligned total knee replacement (TKR) and mechanically aligned TKR,
along with early pain and function scores. In this study we report
the two-year clinical results from this trial. A total of 88 patients
(88 knees) were randomly allocated to undergo either kinematically
aligned TKR using patient-specific guides, or mechanically aligned
TKR using conventional instruments. They were analysed on an intention-to-treat
basis. The patients and the clinical evaluator were blinded to the
method of alignment. At a minimum of two years, all outcomes were better for the kinematically
aligned group, as determined by the mean Oxford knee score (40 (15
to 48) In this study, the use of a kinematic alignment technique performed
with patient-specific guides provided better pain relief and restored
better function and range of movement than the mechanical alignment
technique performed with conventional instruments. Cite this article:
The optimal management of the tibial slope in
achieving a high flexion angle in posterior-stabilised (PS) total
knee replacement (TKR) is not well understood, and most studies
evaluating the posterior tibial slope have been conducted on cruciate-retaining
TKRs. We analysed pre- and post-operative tibial slope differences,
pre- and post-operative coronal knee alignment and post-operative
maximum flexion angle in 167 patients undergoing 209 TKRs. The mean
pre-operative posterior tibial slope was 8.6° (1.3° to 17°) and
post-operatively it was 8.0° (0.1° to 16.7°). Multiple linear regression
analysis showed that the absolute difference between pre- and post-operative
tibial slope (p <
0.001), post-operative coronal alignment (p
= 0.02) and pre-operative range of movement (p <
0.001) predicted post-operative
flexion. The variance of change in tibial slope became larger as
the post-operative maximum flexion angle decreased. The odds ratio
of having a post-operative flexion angle <
100° was 17.6 if the
slope change was >
2°. Our data suggest that recreation of the anatomical
tibial slope appears to improve maximum flexion after posterior-stabilised
TKR, provided coronal alignment has been restored. Cite this article:
New developments in osteotomy techniques and methods of fixation have caused a revival of interest of osteotomies around the knee. The current consensus on the indications, patient selection and the factors influencing the outcome after high tibial osteotomy is presented. This paper highlights recent research aimed at joint pressure redistribution, fixation stability and bone healing that has led to improved surgical techniques and a decrease of post-operative time to full weight-bearing.
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine
the mid- to long-term clinical outcomes for a medial-pivot total
knee replacement (TKR) system. The objectives were to synthesise
available survivorship, Knee Society Scores (KSS), and reasons for
revision for this system. A systematic search was conducted of two online databases to
identify sources of survivorship, KSS, and reasons for revision.
Survivorship results were compared with values in the National Joint
Registry of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (NJR).Objectives
Methods
We conducted a randomised prospective study to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement of similar design in 174 patients who had bilateral simultaneous knee replacement. The mean follow-up was for 5.6 years (5.2 to 6.1). The total knee score, pain score, functional score and range of movement were not statistically different (p >
0.05) between the two groups. Osteolysis was not seen in any knee in either group. Two knees (1%) in the mobile-bearing group required revision because of infection; none in the fixed-bearing group needed revision. Excellent results can be achieved with both mobile- and fixed-bearing prostheses of similar design at mid-term follow-up. We could demonstrate no significant clinical advantage for a mobile bearing.
We investigated the characteristics of patients
who achieved Japanese-style deep flexion (seiza-sitting) after total knee
replacement (TKR) and measured three-dimensional positioning and
the contact positions of the femoral and tibial components. Seiza-sitting
was achieved after surgery by 23 patients (29 knees) of a series
of 463 TKRs in 341 patients. Pre-operatively most of these patients
were capable of seiza-sitting, had a lower body mass index and a favourable
attitude towards the Japanese lifestyle (27 of 29 knees). According
to two-/three-dimensional image registration analysis in the seiza-sitting
position, flexion, varus and internal rotation angles of the tibial
component relative to the femoral component had means of 148° ( Cite this article:
The strain on clinic and surgeon resources resulting
from a rise in demand for total knee replacement (TKR) requires reconsideration
of when and how often patients need to be seen for follow-up. Surgeons
will otherwise require increased paramedical staff or need to limit
the number of TKRs they undertake. We reviewed the outcome data
of 16 414 primary TKRs undertaken at our centre to determine the
time to re-operation for any reason and for specific failure mechanisms.
Peak risk years for failure were determined by comparing the conditional
probability of failure, the number of failures divided by the total
number of TKRs cases, for each year. The median times to failure
for the most common failure mechanisms were 4.9 years (interquartile
range (IQR) 1.7 to 10.7) for femoral and tibial loosening, 1.9 years
(IQR 0.8 to 3.9) for infection, 3.1 years (IQR 1.6 to 5.5) for tibial
collapse and 5.6 years (IQR 3.4 to 9.3) for instability. The median
time to failure for all revisions was 3.3 years (IQR 1.2 to 8.5),
with an overall revision rate of 1.7% (n = 282). Results from our
patient population suggest that patients be seen for follow-up at
six months, one year, three years, eight years, 12 years, and every
five years thereafter. Patients with higher pain in the early post-operative
period or high body mass index (≥ 41 kg/m2) should be
monitored more closely. Cite this article:
There are several methods for evaluating stability
of the joint during total knee replacement (TKR). Activities of daily
living demand mechanical loading to the knee joint, not only in
full extension, but also in mid-flexion. The purpose of this study
was to compare the varus-valgus stability throughout flexion in
knees treated with either cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilised
TKR, using an intra-operative navigation technique. A total of 34
knees underwent TKR with computer navigation, during which the investigator
applied a maximum varus-valgus stress to the knee while steadily
moving the leg from full extension to flexion both before and after
prosthetic implantation. The femorotibial angle was measured simultaneously
by the navigation system at every 10° throughout the range of movement.
It was found that posterior-stabilised knees had more varus-valgus
laxity than cruciate-retaining knees at all angles examined, and
the differences were statistically significant at 10° (p = 0.0093),
20° (p = 0.0098) and 30° of flexion (p = 0.0252). Cite this article:
PCL retaining fixed-bearing TKA is a highly successful
operation with the need for more surgery occurring at the rate of
approximately 0.4% per year over the first 27 years. The most common
cause for revision surgery is related to polyethylene insert failure
and accounts for approximately 50% of re-operations. Late metastatic
infection is the next most frequent cause followed by patellar problems,
late instability and component loosening in decreasing frequency.
A myriad of rare miscellaneous problems can also occur.
Fixed flexion deformities are common in osteoarthritic
knees that are indicated for total knee arthroplasty. The lack of
full extension at the knee results in a greater force of quadriceps
contracture and energy expenditure. It also results in slower walking
velocity and abnormal gait mechanics, overloading the contralateral
limb. Residual flexion contractures after TKA have been associated
with poorer functional scores and outcomes. Although some flexion contractures may resolve with time after
surgery, a substantial percentage will become permanent. Therefore,
it is essential to correct fixed flexion deformities at the time
of TKA, and be vigilant in the post-operative course to maintain
the correction. Surgical techniques to address pre-operative flexion contractures
include: adequate bone resection, ligament releases, removal of
posterior osteophytes, and posterior capsular releases. Post-operatively,
extension can be maintained with focused physiotherapy, a specially
modified continuous passive motion machine, a contralateral heel
lift, and splinting.
We systematically reviewed the published literature
on the complications of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy for
the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Publications
were identified using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and
CINAHL databases up to February 2012. We assessed randomised (RCTs), controlled
group clinical (CCTs) trials, case series in publications associated
with closing wedge osteotomy of the tibia in patients with osteoarthritis
of the knee and finally a Cochrane review. Many of these trials
included comparative studies (opening wedge
The success of total knee replacement (TKR) depends
on optimal soft-tissue balancing, among many other factors. The
objective of this study is to correlate post-operative anteroposterior
(AP) translation of a posterior cruciate ligament-retaining TKR
with clinical outcome at two years. In total 100 patients were divided
into three groups based on their AP translation as measured by the
KT-1000 arthrometer. Group 1 patients had AP translation <
5
mm, Group 2 had AP translation from 5 mm to 10 mm, and Group 3 had
AP translation >
10 mm. Outcome assessment included range of movement
of the knee, the presence of flexion contractures, hyperextension,
knee mechanical axes and functional outcome using the Knee Society
score, Oxford knee score and the Short-Form 36 questionnaire. At two years, patients in Group 2 reported significantly better
Oxford knee scores than the other groups (p = 0.045). A positive
correlation between range of movement and AP translation was noted,
with patients in group 3 having the greatest range of movement (mean
flexion: 117.9° (106° to 130°)) (p <
0.001). However, significantly
more patients in Group 3 developed hyperextension >
10° (p = 0.01). In this study, the best outcome for cruciate-ligament retaining
TKR was achieved in patients with an AP translation of 5 mm to 10
mm.
The April 2012 Knee Roundup360 looks at the torn ACL, ACL reconstruction, the risk of ACL rupture, the benefit of warm-ups before exercise, glucosamine and tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, sensitisation and sporting tendinopathy, pain relief after TKR, the long-term results of the Genesis I, the gender specific recovery times after TKR, and the accuracy of the orthopaedic eyeball
We aimed to obtain anthropometric data on Korean
knees and to compare these with data on commonly available total
knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The dimensions of the femora and tibiae
of 1168 knees were measured intra-operatively. The femoral components
were found to show a tendency toward mediolateral (ML) under-coverage
in small femurs and ML overhang in the large femurs. The ML under-coverage
was most prominent for the small prostheses. The ML/anteroposterior
(ML/AP) ratio of Korean tibiae was greater than that of tibial components. This study shows that, for different reasons, current TKAs do
not provide a reasonable fit for small or large Korean knees, and
that the ‘gender-specific’ and ‘stature-specific’ components help
for large Korean femurs but offer less satisfactory fits for small
femurs. Specific modifications of prostheses are needed for Asian
knees.
We compared extrusion of the allograft after
medial and lateral meniscal allograft transplantation and examined
the correlation between the extent of extrusion and the clinical
outcome. A total of 73 lateral and 26 medial meniscus allografts
were evaluated by MRI at a mean of 32 months (24 to 59) in 99 patients
(67 men, 32 women) with a mean age of 35 years (21 to 52). The absolute
values and the proportional widths of extruded menisci as a percentage were
measured in coronal images that showed maximum extrusion. Functional
assessments were performed using Lysholm scores. The mean extrusion
was 4.7 mm (1.8 to 7.7) for lateral menisci and 2.9 mm (1.2 to 6.5)
for medial menisci (p <
0.001), and the mean percentage extrusions
were 52.0% (23.8% to 81.8%) and 31.2% (11.6% to 63.4%), respectively
(p <
0.001). Mean Lysholm scores increased significantly from
49.0 (10 to 83) pre-operatively to 86.6 (33 to 99) at final follow-up
for lateral menisci (p = 0.001) and from 50.9 (15 to 88) to 88.3
(32 to 100) for medial menisci (p <
0.001). The final mean Lysholm
scores were similar in the two groups (p = 0.312). Furthermore,
Lysholm scores were not found to be correlated with degree of extrusion
(p = 0.242). Thus, transplanted lateral menisci extrude more significantly
than transplanted medial menisci. However, the clinical outcome
after meniscal transplantation was not found to be adversely affected
by extrusion of the allograft.
A total of 445 consecutive primary total knee
replacements (TKRs) were followed up prospectively at six and 18 months
and three, six and nine years. Patients were divided into two groups:
non-obese (body mass index (BMI) <
30 kg/m2) and obese
(BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). The obese group was subdivided into
mildly obese (BMI 30 to 35 kg/m2) and highly obese (BMI ≥ 35
kg/m2) in order to determine the effects of increasing
obesity on outcome. The clinical data analysed included the Knee
Society score, peri-operative complications and implant survival.
There was no difference in the overall complication rates or implant
survival between the two groups. Obesity appears to have a small but significant adverse effect
on clinical outcome, with highly obese patients showing lower function
scores than non-obese patients. However, significant improvements
in outcome are sustained in all groups nine years after TKR. Given
the substantial, sustainable relief of symptoms after TKR and the low
peri-operative complication and revision rates in these two groups,
we have found no reason to limit access to TKR in obese patients.