1. A study of fifty femoral heads removed at operation for primary prosthetic replacement showed a remarkable constancy of the fracture line. 2. It is suggested that two sub-groups of this fracture-subcapital and transcervical-have been described as a result of radiological interpretation without consideration of the effects of varying degrees of rotation.
We compared a new fixation system, the Targon
Femoral Neck (TFN) hip screw, with the current standard treatment of
cannulated screw fixation. This was a single-centre, participant-blinded,
randomised controlled trial. Patients aged 65 years and over with
either a displaced or undisplaced intracapsular fracture of the
hip were eligible. The primary outcome was the risk of revision
surgery within one year of fixation. A total of 174 participants were included in the trial. The absolute
reduction in risk of revision was of 4.7% (95% CI 14.2 to 22.5)
in favour of the TFN hip screw (chi-squared test, p = 0.741), which
was less than the pre-specified level of minimum clinically important
difference. There were no significant differences in any of the
secondary outcome measures. We found no evidence of a clinical difference in the risk of
revision surgery between the TFN hip screw and cannulated screw
fixation for patients with an intracapsular fracture of the hip. Cite this article:
The results obtained from combined chemotherapy and radical surgery in eighteen patients with trochanteric tuberculosis have been satisfactory so far, although the period of observation is still short. The results compare very favourably with those of all other methods of treatment.
We report a series of 640 consecutive cervical hip fractures which were followed prospectively for two years after primary internal fixation with two hook-pins. Secondary arthroplasties were performed as salvage procedures in 75 cases and the early outcome of these was studied retrospectively. The mean time in hospital was 25 days for prosthetic replacement, though 60% of the patients had other medical conditions considered as risk factors. Mortality was 5% after six months and 8% after one year. Dislocation was seen in 11% and additional surgery was required in 4%. There was one case of deep infection and one supracondylar femoral fracture. In some cases there was considerable delay between the primary and secondary operation due to lack of awareness of functional deterioration, but although many patients had poor mobility before the secondary operation this was greatly improved within six weeks of the arthroplasty. We conclude that elective secondary hip arthroplasty for failure of fracture fixation is a safe and successful procedure. Once the decision to perform an arthroplasty is taken, this should be done without delay to avoid deterioration of function.
We studied intracapsular pressure in 50 patients with Garden Grade I and II subcapital fractures. Before operation pressures varied from zero to 320 mmHg, 16 patients having an intracapsular pressure of over 80 mmHg. The pressure was increased considerably by medial rotation and decreased by lateral rotation and especially by semi-flexion. From zero to 36 ml of blood was aspirated; the amount did not correlate with the intracapsular pressure. Of 25 patients who were also examined by scintimetry, 13 had reduced uptake at the femoral head before aspiration, and nine of these showed a marked increase in uptake after aspiration. Intracapsular tamponade of the hip may be one reason for the occasional occurrence of segmental collapse of the femoral head after subcapital fracture with minor displacement.
1. Seventy-four patients over the age of seventy with either subcapital or intertrochanteric fracture have been investigated for evidence of osteomalacia. To establish an index of suspicion the incidence of biochemically defined osteomalacia has been compared with quantitative histology in this group. 2. Whereas no significant difference in the incidence of the disease was noted in the comparison of subcapital with trochanteric fracture groups, there was a high incidence of osteomalacia overall. Furthermore, a subclinical form of the disease appears to exist. 3. The relevance of these observations is discussed with particular reference to the established diagnostic criteria of the condition.
1. Recently described histological and radiographic methods of diagnosing osteoporosis have been applied to patients with transcervical and intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. 2. Both methods indicate a higher incidence of osteoporosis in such patients than in a control series, especially in older women with intertrochanteric fractures. 3. A discrepancy between the results of biopsy and radiographic examination was encountered, the explanation of which is not yet clear.
A Judet-type arthroplasty of the hip was performed. The patient died fourteen days after the operation. The upper end of the femur was examined and showed extensive necrosis surrounding the stem of the prosthesis.
Concerns have been reported to the United Kingdom
National Patient Safety Agency, warning that cementing the femoral component
during hip replacement surgery for fracture of the proximal femur
may increase peri-operative mortality. The National Hip Fracture Database collects demographic and outcome
data about patients with a fracture of the proximal femur from over
100 participating hospitals in the United Kingdom. We conducted
a mixed effects logistic regression analysis of this dataset to
determine whether peri-operative mortality was increased in patients
who had undergone either hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement
using a cemented femoral component. A total of 16 496 patients from
129 hospitals were included in the analysis, which showed a small
but significant adjusted survival benefit associated with cementing
(odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 0.96). Other statistically
significant variables in predicting death at discharge, listed in
order of magnitude of effect, were gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists
grade, age, walking accompanied outdoors and arthroplasty. Interaction
terms between cementing and these other variables were sequentially
added to, but did not improve, the model. This study has not shown an increase in peri-operative mortality
as a result of cementing the femoral component in patients requiring
hip replacement following fracture of the proximal femur.