Displaced extension supracondylar fractures of the elbow 1. One hundred and ten children were treated by reduction and stabilisation by two pins inserted laterally at an angle of 30 degrees to one another. 2. The complications before and after treatment included fifteen nerve lesions in thirteen patients. The ulnar nerve was involved on one occasion only. Solitary radial nerve injuries occurred with postero-medial displacement of the distal fragment, while median nerve and brachial artery injuries were associated with postero-lateral displacement. All the lesions recovered spontaneously. 3. There were no ischaemic complications after treatment, despite the ligation of one ruptured brachial artery. 4. The average stay in hospital was four days, compared with twenty days for thirty-two other patients treated in traction because of gross oedema. 5. Of eighty patients seen six months to five years after the fracture, seventy (or 87·5 per cent) had excellent or good results, seven patients with marked varus deformities had fair results, and two patients had poor results with very stiff elbows. Displaced flexion fractures 1. The clinical features, complications and treatment of seventeen cases are described. 2. There were no complications involving the median or radial nerves or the brachial artery, but three patients had a lesion of the ulnar nerve. 3. Nine children had closed reduction and fixation by two lateral percutaneous pins. 4. Reduction was difficult and the results poor compared with extension fractures. Closed reduction failed in one-third of the children, and the functional and cosmetic results were unsatisfactory in over half the patients reviewed

We reviewed 21 patients with Mason type-III fractures of the radial head treated by resection, evaluating the results at 16 to 30 years by a standard questionnaire and clinical and radiological examination of the elbow and wrist. Seventeen patients had an excellent result, three were good and one fair. Resection of the radial head is a satisfactory method of treatment of such fractures. Prosthetic replacement seems to be indicated only when there is valgus instability of the elbow

We compared the results in two groups of patients with late reduction of posterior elbow dislocations, one of which had lengthening of the triceps (group A, n = 36) and the other did not (group B, n = 34). The elbows had all been dislocated for more than one month and less than three months. The patients in group B had better clinical results and significantly less postoperative flexion contracture (p < 0.05)

We carried out a prospective randomised study comparing medial epicondylectomy with anterior transposition for the treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. The mean follow-up period was 4.5 years and we assessed the patients neurologically and orthopaedically. Neither procedure appeared to have a significant effect on elbow function. Our study showed better results after medial epicondylectomy; in particular patient satisfaction was higher than after ulnar nerve transposition. There were no significant differences in motor power or nerve-conduction rates and sensory fibres appeared to be more vulnerable to devascularisation

Two cases of unusual snapping at the elbow are described. In both, the medial head of the triceps was found to be separated from the main muscle belly. During flexion of the elbow, the medial head dislocated over the medial epicondyle, producing a characteristic snapping phenomenon. Both cases were of long standing and had been asymptomatic for years. The first clinical symptoms were those of an ulnar neuropathy. In order to restore the normal position of the medial head of the triceps, its tendon was detached from the olecranon, passed under the central tendon and interlaced to it. The ulnar nerve was left in the epicondylar groove in one case and transposed anteriorly in the other. At the end of the procedure flexion of the elbow was unobstructed and the snapping phenomenon had disappeared

Fifteen patients with rheumatoid arthritis had 19 elbow arthroplasties with the Wadsworth type of surface replacement prosthesis. After a follow-up period averaging 30 months, 11 patients with 15 elbow arthroplasties were entirely satisfied with their freedom from pain and range of movement. Radiologically, however, the humeral component was loose in 10 of the 19 elbows and the ulnar component in 5. Two patients had reoperation, one to remove a prosthesis for early deep infection and one to exchange a humeral component which was loose. The risk of mechanical loosening is reduced by accurate positioning of the humeral component, but there is a high potential for failure. Changes in the design of the prosthesis and better instrumentation for alignment of the components are desirable. Prosthetic replacement of the elbow should still be regarded as experimental

Four cases of arterial damage resulting from closed posterior dislocation of the elbow are described. Two of these have been successfully treated by conservative methods and two by vein graft to the damaged artery. Sixteen previous cases are detailed and the management of this uncommon complication of dislocated elbow is discussed

Total elbow replacement can be a valuable option for the treatment of the elbow in haemophilia where there are associated arthropathic changes. We describe the outcome of seven elbow replacements in five consecutive patients with severe haemophilia A (native factor levels < 1%) at a mean of 42 months (25 to 65) after operation. All the patients had excellent relief of pain and improvement in function. One failure was due to infection in an immunocompromised patient with both HIV and Hepatitis C antibodies who was on anti-retroviral chemotherapy. The implant was revised at 30 months in a one-stage procedure and showed no evidence of loosening or infection 35 months later

1. Synovectomy of the elbow affected by rheumatoid arthritis is a worthwhile procedure even in the presence of advanced radiological changes. 2. Relief of pain is good (93 per cent) and movement is retained (87 per cent). 3. Although the follow-up in this series was short, averaging nineteen months, the results seem to be maintained. 4. Good access to the joint may be had through medial and lateral incisions, and division of the olecranon is unnecessary. A lateral incision alone is not recommended. 5. The ulnar nerve should be preserved during dissection. Anterior transposition is needed only if there are neurological symptoms before operation

1. Rupture of the brachial artery or of one of its divisions in association with elbow injuries is probably more common than a survey of the literature would imply. Three cases of rupture of the brachial artery complicating compound dislocation of the elbow are reported. 2. These cases appear to have a consistent pattern of soft-tissue damage, with avulsion of the common flexor origin, and a varying degree of damage to the biceps and brachialis. The median nerve escaped injury. 3. The method of dealing with the divided vessels does not appear to be of importance in determining the outcome, simple ligation being as satisfactory as attempts at grafting or suture. 4. In no case was there any evidence of Volkmann's contracture. Provided rapid reduction of the dislocation is effected, together with ligation of the vessels, a satisfactory return of the circulation may be expected