Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 121 - 125 of 125
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1673 - 1674
1 Dec 2007
ROSS R MIRZA AH NORRIS HE KHATRI M


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 5 | Pages 554 - 555
1 May 2008
Marshall RW

The indications for lumbar discectomy are pain and neurological dysfunction. This paper considers the extent and timing of neurological recovery following spinal decompression.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 2 | Pages 201 - 204
1 Feb 2005
Schaeren S Bischoff-Ferrari HA Knupp M Dick W Huber JF Theiler R

We validated the North American Spine Society (NASS) outcome-assessment instrument for the lumbar spine in a computerised touch-screen format and assessed patients’ acceptance, taking into account previous computer experience, age and gender.

Fifty consecutive patients with symptomatic and radiologically-proven degenerative disease of the lumbar spine completed both the hard copy (paper) and the computerised versions of the NASS questionnaire. Statistical analysis showed high agreement between the paper and the touch-screen computer format for both subscales (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.94, 95% confidence interval (0.90 to 0.97)) independent of computer experience, age and gender. In total, 55% of patients stated that the computer format was easier to use and 66% preferred it to the paper version (p < 0.0001 among subjects expressing a preference). Our data indicate that the touch-screen format is comparable to the paper form. It may improve follow-up in clinical practice and research by meeting patients’ preferences and minimising administrative work.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1029 - 1037
1 Aug 2005
Mayer HM


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 2 | Pages 241 - 248
1 Feb 2005
Pynsent PB Adams DJ Disney SP

The Oxford hip and knee scores are used to measure the outcome after primary total hip and knee replacement. We propose a new layout for the instrument in which patients are always asked about both limbs. In addition, we have defined an alternative scoring method which accounts for missing data. Over a period of 4.5 years, 4086 (1423 patients) and 5708 (1458 patients) questionnaires were completed for hips and knees, respectively. The hip score had a pre-operative median of 70.8 (interquartile range (IQR) 58.3 to 81.2) decreasing to 20.8 (IQR 10.4 to 35.4) after one year. The knee score had a pre-operative median of 68.8 (IQR 56.2 to 79.2) decreasing to 29.2 (IQR 14.6 to 45.8). There was no further significant change in either score after one year. As a result of the data analysis, we suggest that the score percentiles can be used as a standard for auditing patients before and after operation.