The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Orthopaedic departments have adopted business continuity models and guidelines for essential and non-essential surgeries to preserve hospital resources as well as protect patients and staff. These guidelines broadly encompass reduction of ambulatory care with a move towards telemedicine, redeployment of orthopaedic surgeons/residents to the frontline battle against COVID-19, continuation of education and research through web-based means, and cancellation of non-essential elective procedures. However, if containment of COVID-19 community spread is achieved, resumption of elective orthopaedic procedures and transition plans to return to normalcy must be considered for orthopaedic departments. The COVID-19 pandemic also presents a moral dilemma to the orthopaedic surgeon considering elective procedures. What is the best treatment for our patients and how does the fear of COVID-19 influence the risk-benefit discussion during a pandemic? Surgeons must deliberate the fine balance between elective surgery for a patient’s wellbeing versus risks to the operating team and utilization of precious hospital resources. Attrition of healthcare workers or Orthopaedic surgeons from restarting elective procedures prematurely or in an unsafe manner may render us ill-equipped to handle the second wave of infections. This highlights the need to develop effective screening protocols or preoperative COVID-19 testing before elective procedures in high-risk, elderly individuals with comorbidities. Alternatively, high-risk individuals should be postponed until the risk of nosocomial COVID-19 infection is minimal. In addition, given the higher mortality and perioperative morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing surgery, the decision to operate must be carefully deliberated. As we ramp-up elective services and get “back to business” as orthopaedic surgeons, we have to be constantly mindful to proceed in a cautious and calibrated fashion, delivering the best care, while maintaining utmost vigilance to prevent the resurgence of COVID-19 during this critical transition period. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between pre- and postoperative opioid use among patients undergoing common elective orthopaedic procedures Pre- and postoperative opioid use were studied among patients from a national insurance database undergoing seven common orthopaedic procedures using univariate log-rank tests and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses.Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Medicare Inpatient Only (IPO) list on our Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative in 2018. We examined our institutional database to identify all Medicare patients who underwent primary TKA from 2017 to 2018. Hospital inpatient or outpatient status was cross-referenced with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) claims data. Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared between patients classified as ‘outpatient’ and ‘inpatient’ TKA. Episode-of-care BPCI costs were then compared from 2017 to 2018.Aims
Methods
The February 2014 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup. 360 . looks at: length of stay; cementless metaphyseal fixation; mortality trends in over 400,000
Free vascularised fibular grafting has been reported
to be successful for adult patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral
head (ONFH). However, its benefit in teenage patients with post-traumatic
ONFH has not been determined. We evaluated the effectiveness of
free vascularised fibular grafting in the treatment of this condition
in children and adolescents. We retrospectively analysed 28 hips
in 28 patients in whom an osteonecrotic femoral head had been treated
with free vascularised fibular grafting between 2002 and 2008. Their
mean age was 16.3 years (13 to 19). The stage of the disease at
time of surgery, and results of treatment including pre- and post-operative
Harris hip scores, were studied. We defined clinical failure as
conversion to
The accurate reconstruction of hip anatomy and
biomechanics is thought to be important in achieveing good clinical
outcomes following
Femoral revision component subsidence has been identified as predicting early failure in revision hip surgery. This comparative cohort study assessed the potential risk factors of subsidence in two commonly used femoral implant designs. A comparative cohort study was undertaken, analyzing a consecutive series of patients following revision total hip arthroplasties using either a tapered-modular (TM) fluted titanium or a porous-coated cylindrical modular (PCM) titanium femoral component, between April 2006 and May 2018. Clinical and radiological assessment was compared for both treatment cohorts. Risk factors for subsidence were assessed and compared.Aims
Methods
Aims . The highly cross-linked polyethylene Exeter RimFit flanged cemented
acetabular component was introduced in the United Kingdom in 2010.
This study aimed to examine the rates of emergence of radiolucent
lines observed when the Rimfit acetabular component was implanted
at
Cementless acetabular fixation has demonstrated superior long-term durability in
A lack of supporting clinical studies have been published to determine the ideal length of intramedullary nail in fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip. Nevertheless, there has been a trend to use shorter intramedullary nails for the internal fixation of trochanteric hip fractures. Our aim was to determine if the length of nail affected the outcome. We randomized 229 patients with a trochanteric hip fracture between two implants: a ‘standard’ nail of 220 mm and a shorter nail of 175 mm, which had decreased proximal angulation (4° vs 7°) and a reduced diameter at the level of the lesser trochanter. Patients were followed up for one year by a nurse blinded to the type of implant used to determine if there were differences in mobility and pain with two nail designs. Pain was assessed on a scale of 1 (none) to 8 (severe and constant) and mobility on a scale of 1 (full mobility) to 9 (immobile).Aims
Methods
Aims. The purpose of this study was to validate the diagnosis of periprosthetic
joint infection (PJI) in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR). Patients and Methods. We identified a cohort of patients from the DHR who had undergone
primary
When using a staged approach to eradicate chronic infection after
Recently, the use of metal-on-metal articulations
in
As adverse events related to metal on metal hip
arthroplasty have been better understood, there has been increased
interest in toxicity related to the high circulating levels of cobalt ions.
However, distinguishing true toxicity from benign elevations in
cobalt levels can be challenging. The purpose of this review is
to examine the use of cobalt alloys in
Aims. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of
an enhanced recovery program (ERP) on the short-term functional
outcome after
The repair of chondral lesions associated with
femoroacetabular impingement requires specific treatment in addition
to that of the impingement. In this single-centre retrospective
analysis of a consecutive series of patients we compared treatment
with microfracture (MFx) with a technique of enhanced microfracture
autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC). Acetabular grade III and IV chondral lesions measuring between
2 cm. 2. and 8 cm. 2. in 147 patients were treated
by MFx in 77 and AMIC in 70. The outcome was assessed using the
modified Harris hip score at six months and one, two, three, four
and five years post-operatively. The outcome in both groups was
significantly improved at six months and one year post-operatively.
During the subsequent four years the outcome in the MFx group slowly deteriorated,
whereas that in the AMIC group remained stable. Six patients in
the MFx group subsequently required
Aims. The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of previous
lumbar surgery in patients who undergo