The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of operative intervention for femoral metastases which were selected based on expected survival and to discuss appropriate surgical strategies. From 2002 to 2017, 148 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for femoral metastasis were included in this study. Prognostic risk assessments were performed according to the Katagiri and revised Katagiri scoring system. In general, the low-risk group underwent resection and reconstruction with endoprosthetic replacement (EPR), while the high-risk group underwent internal fixation (IF) and radiation therapy. For the intermediate-risk group, the operative choice depended on the patient’s condition, degree of bone destruction, and radio-sensitivity. Overall survival, local failure, walking ability, and systemic complications were evaluated.Aims
Methods
In this cross sectional study, the impact and the efficacy of a surveillance programme for sarcomas of the extremities was analysed. All patients who had treatment with curative intent for a high-grade sarcoma and were diagnosed before 2014 were included and followed for a minimum of two years.Objectives
Methods
The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic factors for postoperative neurological recovery and survival in patients with complete paralysis due to neoplastic epidural spinal cord compression. The medical records of 135 patients with complete paralysis due to neoplastic cord compression were retrospectively reviewed. Potential factors including the timing of surgery, muscular tone, and tumour characteristics were analyzed in relation to neurological recovery using logistical regression analysis. The association between neurological recovery and survival was analyzed using a Cox model. A nomogram was formulated to predict recovery.Aims
Patients and Methods
Intercalary allografts following resection of a primary diaphyseal
tumour have high rates of complications and failures. At our institution
intercalary allografts are augmented with intramedullary cement
and fixed using compression plating. Our aim was to evaluate their
long-term outcomes. A total of 46 patients underwent reconstruction with an intercalary
allograft between 1989 and 2014. The patients had a mean age of
32.8 years (14 to 77). The most common diagnoses were osteosarcoma
(n = 16) and chondrosarcoma (n = 9). The location of the tumours
was in the femur in 21, the tibia in 16 and the humerus in nine. Function
was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring
system and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). The survival
of the graft and the overall survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.Aims
Patients and Methods
The December 2015 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Amputation may not be the best option; Growing golf balls bad news!; How close is safe? Radiotherapy and surgery; Lymphocyte: monocyte ratio in osteosarcoma; Are borderline cartilage tumours really borderline?; Boosting algorithms improves survival estimates; CT better than Mirels?
As tumours of bone and soft tissue are rare, multicentre prospective collaboration is essential for meaningful research and evidence-based advances in patient care. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators encountered in large-scale collaborative research by orthopaedic oncological surgeons involved or interested in prospective multicentre collaboration. All surgeons who were involved, or had expressed an interest, in the ongoing Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumour Surgery (PARITY) trial were invited to participate in a focus group to discuss their experiences with collaborative research in this area. The discussion was digitally recorded, transcribed and anonymised. The transcript was analysed qualitatively, using an analytic approach which aims to organise the data in the language of the participants with little theoretical interpretation.Objectives
Methods
Patients who have limb amputation for musculoskeletal
tumours are a rare group of cancer survivors. This was a prospective
cross-sectional survey of patients from five specialist centres
for sarcoma surgery in England. Physical function, pain and quality
of life (QOL) outcomes were collected after lower extremity amputation
for bone or soft-tissue tumours to evaluate the survivorship experience
and inform service provision. Of 250 patients, 105 (42%) responded between September 2012 and
June 2013. From these, completed questionnaires were received from
100 patients with a mean age of 53.6 years (19 to 91). In total
60 (62%) were male and 37 (38%) were female (three not specified).
The diagnosis was primary bone sarcoma in 63 and soft-tissue tumour
in 37. A total of 20 tumours were located in the hip or pelvis,
31 above the knee, 32 between the knee and ankle and 17 in the ankle
or foot. In total 22 had hemipelvectomy, nine hip disarticulation,
35 transfemoral amputation, one knee disarticulation, 30 transtibial
amputation, two toe amputations and one rotationplasty. The Toronto
Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) differed by amputation level, with
poorer scores at higher levels (p <
0.001). Many reported significant
pain. In addition, TESS was negatively associated with increasing
age, and pain interference scores. QOL for Cancer Survivors was
significantly correlated with TESS (p <
0.001). This relationship appeared
driven by pain interference scores. This unprecedented national survey confirms amputation level
is linked to physical function, but not QOL or pain measures. Pain
and physical function significantly impact on QOL. These results
are helpful in managing the expectations of patients about treatment
and addressing their complex needs. Cite this article:
The February 2014 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: suspicious lesions; limb salvage in pelvic sarcomas; does infection affect oncological survival?; cancer patient pathways; radiological arthritis with cement augmentation in GCT; and post-chemotherapy increase in tumour volume as a predictor of poor prognosis.
The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of
the duration of symptoms (DOS) prior to diagnosis on the overall
survival in patients with a primary bone sarcoma. In a retrospective analysis of a sarcoma database at a single
institution between 1990 and 2014, we identified 1446 patients with
non-metastatic and 346 with metastatic bone sarcoma. Low-grade types
of tumour were excluded. Our data included the demographics of the
patients, the characteristics of the tumour, and the survival outcome
of patients. Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan–Meier
survival analysis were performed, and the survivorship of the non-metastatic
and metastatic cohorts were compared.Aims
Patients and Methods
The June 2013 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: whether allograft composite is superior to megaprosthesis in massive reconstruction; pain from glomus tumours; thromboembolism and orthopaedic malignancy; bone marrow aspirate and cavity lesions; metastasectomy in osteosarcoma; spinal giant cell tumour; post-atomic strike sarcoma; and superficial sarcomas and post-operative infection rates.
The August 2014 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Anaesthesic modality does not affect outcomes in tumour surgery; infection predictors in orthopaedic oncology; sarcoma depth unimportant in survival; photon/proton radiotherapy surprisingly effective in chondrosarcoma control; total humerus replacement a success!; LDH simple predictor of survival in sarcoma; Denosumab again! and Oops procedures in triplicate.
The aims of this study were to analyse the long-term outcome
of vascularised fibular graft (VFG) reconstruction after tumour
resection and to evaluate the usefulness of the method. We retrospectively reviewed 49 patients who had undergone resection
of a sarcoma and reconstruction using a VFG between 1988 and 2015.
Their mean follow-up was 98 months (5 to 317). Reconstruction was
with an osteochondral graft (n = 13), intercalary graft (n = 12),
inlay graft (n = 4), or resection arthrodesis (n = 20). We analysed
the oncological and functional outcome, and the rate of bony union
and complications.Aims
Patients and Methods
