Talonavicular and subtalar joint fusion through
a medial incision (modified triple arthrodesis) has become an increasingly
popular technique for treating symptomatic flatfoot deformity caused
by posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to look at its clinical and radiological
mid- to long-term outcomes, including the rates of recurrent flatfoot
deformity, nonunion and avascular necrosis of the dome of the talus. A total of 84 patients (96 feet) with a symptomatic rigid flatfoot
deformity caused by posterior tibial tendon dysfunction were treated
using a modified triple arthrodesis. The mean age of the patients
was 66 years (35 to 85) and the mean follow-up was 4.7 years (1 to 8.3).
Both clinical and radiological outcomes were analysed retrospectively. In 86 of the 95 feet (90.5%) for which radiographs were available,
there was no loss of correction at final follow-up. In all, 14 feet
(14.7%) needed secondary surgery, six for nonunion, two for avascular
necrosis, five for progression of the flatfoot deformity and tibiotalar
arthritis and one because of symptomatic overcorrection. The mean
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hindfoot score (AOFAS
score) at final follow-up was 67 (between 16 and 100) and the mean
visual analogue score for pain 2.4 points (between 0 and 10). In conclusion, modified triple arthrodesis provides reliable
correction of deformity and a good clinical outcome at mid- to long-term
follow-up, with nonunion as the most frequent complication. Avascular
necrosis of the talus is a rare but serious complication of this
technique. Cite this article:
The February 2014 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: optimal medial malleolar fixation; resurfacing in the talus; predicting outcome in mobility ankles; whether mal-aligned ankles can be successfully replaced; cartilage colonisation in bipolar ankle grafts; CTs and proof of fusion; recalcitrant Achilles tendinopathy; and recurrent fifth metatarsal stress fractures.
The December 2015 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: The midfoot fusion bolt: has it had its day?; Ankle arthroplasty: only for the old?; A return to the Keller’s osteotomy for diabetic feet?; Joint sparing surgery for ankle arthritis in the context of deformity?; Beware the subtalar fusion in the ankle arthrodesis patient?; Nonunion in the foot and ankle a predictive score; Cast
The April 2014 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Hawkins fractures revisited; arthrodesis compared with ankle replacement in osteoarthritis; mobile bearing ankle replacement successful in the longer-term; osteolysis is an increasing worry in ankle replacement; ankle synostosis post-fracture is not important; radiofrequency ablation for plantar fasciitis; and the right approach for tibiotalocalcaneal fusion.
This study assessed the association of classes of body mass index
in kg/m2 (classified as normal weight 18.5 kg/m2 to
24.9 kg/m2, overweight 25.0 kg/m2 to 29.9
kg/m2, and obese ≥ 30.0 kg/m2) with short-term
complications and functional outcomes three to six years post-operatively
for closed ankle fractures. We performed a historical cohort study with chart review of 1011
patients who were treated for ankle fractures by open reduction
and internal fixation in two hospitals, with a follow-up postal
survey of 959 of the patients using three functional outcome scores.Aims
Patients and Methods
The April 2015 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Plantar pressures linked to radiographs; Strength training for ankle instability?; Is weight loss good for your feet?; Diabetes and foot surgery complications; Tantalum for failed ankle arthroplasty?; Steroids, costs and Morton’s neuroma; Ankle arthritis and subtalar joint
In a retrospective study we compared 32 HINTEGRA
total ankle replacements (TARs) and 35 Mobility TARs performed between
July 2005 and May 2010, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The
mean follow-up for the HINTEGRA group was 53 months (24 to 76) and
for the Mobility group was 34 months (24 to 45). All procedures
were performed by a single surgeon. There was no significant difference between the two groups with
regard to the mean AOFAS score, visual analogue score for pain or
range of movement of the ankle at the latest follow-up. Most radiological
measurements did not differ significantly between the two groups.
However, the most common grade of heterotopic ossification (HO)
was grade 3 in the HINTEGRA group (10 of 13 TARs, 76.9%) and grade
2 in the Mobility group (four of seven TARs, 57.1%) (p = 0.025).
Although HO was more frequent in the HINTEGRA group (40.6%) than
in the Mobility group (20.0%), this was not statistically significant
(p = 0.065).The difference in peri-operative complications between
the two groups was not significant, but intra-operative medial malleolar
fractures occurred in four (11.4%) in the Mobility group; four (12.5%)
in the HINTEGRA group and one TAR (2.9%) in the Mobility group failed
(p = 0.185). Cite this article:
The December 2013 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Maisonneuve fractures in the long term; Not all gastrocnemius lengthening equal; Those pesky os fibulare; First tarsometatarsal arthrosis; Juvenile osteochondral lesions; Calcanei and infections; Clinical outcomes of Weber B ankle fractures; and rheumatologists have no impact on ankle rheumatoid arthritis.
The October 2015 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: TightRope in Weber C fractures; A second look at the TightRope; Incisional VAC comes of age?; Platelet-derived growth factor and ankle fusions; Achilles tendon rehab in the longer term following surgery; Telemedicine for diabetic foot ulcer
The October 2013 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Operative treatment of calcaneal fractures advantageous in the long term?; Varus ankles and arthroplasty; Reducing autograft complications in foot and ankle surgery; The biomechanics of ECP in plantar fasciitis; Minimally invasive first ray surgery; Alcohol: better drunk than injected?; Is it different in the foot?; It’s all about the temperature
The August 2015 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Is orthosis more important than physio in tibialis posterior deficiency?; Radiographic evaluation of ankle injury; Sciatic catheter quite enough!; A fresh look at avascular necrosis of the talus; Total ankle and VTE; Outcomes of posterior malleolar fracture; Absorbable sutures in the Achilles tendon; Lisfranc injuries under the spotlight
The June 2015 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Syndesmosis and outcomes in ankle fracture; Ankle arthrodesis or arthroplasty: a complications-based analysis; Crosslinked polyethylene and ankle arthroplasty; Reducing screw removal in calcaneal osteotomies; Revisiting infection control policies; Chevron osteotomy: proximal or distal?; Ankle distraction for osteoarthritis
The incidence of periprosthetic fractures of
the ankle is increasing. However, little is known about the outcome
of treatment and their management remains controversial. The aim
of this study was to assess the impact of periprosthetic fractures
on the functional and radiological outcome of patients with a total
ankle arthroplasty (TAA). A total of 505 TAAs (488 patients) who underwent TAA were retrospectively
evaluated for periprosthetic ankle fracture: these were then classified
according to a recent classification which is orientated towards
treatment. The outcome was evaluated clinically using the American
Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and a visual analogue
scale for pain, and radiologically. A total of 21 patients with a periprosthetic fracture of the
ankle were identified. There were 13 women and eight men. The mean
age of the patients was 63 years (48 to 74). Thus, the incidence
of fracture was 4.17%. There were 11 intra-operative and ten post-operative fractures,
of which eight were stress fractures and two were traumatic. The
prosthesis was stable in all patients. Five stress fractures were
treated conservatively and the remaining three were treated operatively. A total of 17 patients (81%) were examined clinically and radiologically
at a mean follow-up of 53.5 months (12 to 112). The mean AOFAS score
at follow-up was 79.5 (21 to 100). The mean AOFAS score in those
with an intra-operative fracture was 87.6 (80 to 100) and for those
with a stress fracture, which were mainly because of varus malpositioning,
was 67.3 (21 to 93). Periprosthetic fractures of the ankle do not
necessarily adversely affect the clinical outcome, provided that
a treatment algorithm is implemented with the help of a new classification
system. Cite this article: