The aim of this study was to present the long-term surgical outcomes, complications, implant survival, and causes of implant failure in patients treated with the modified Harrington procedure using antegrade large diameter pins. A cohort of 50 consecutive patients who underwent the modified Harrington procedure for periacetabular metastasis or haematological malignancy between January 1996 and April 2018 were studied. The median follow-up time for all survivors was 3.2 years (interquartile range 0.9 to 7.6 years).Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of patients who underwent definitive surgery for secondary chondrosarcomas arising from osteochondromas. A total of 51 patients with secondary chondrosarcomas occurring from osteochondromas were reviewed. Median age was 36 years (interquartile range (IQR) 15 to 82). Median follow-up was 6.9 years (IQR 2.8 to 10.6). The pelvis was the most commonly affected site (59%). Histological grades were grade I in 35 (69%), grade II in 13 (25%), and grade III in three patients (6%).Aims
Patients and Methods
Aseptic loosening is a major cause of failure in cemented endoprosthetic reconstructions. This paper presents the long-term outcomes of a custom-designed cross-pin fixation construct designed to minimize rotational stress and subsequent aseptic loosening in selected patients. The paper will also examine the long-term survivorship and modes of failure when using this technique. A review of 658 consecutive, prospectively collected cemented endoprosthetic reconstructions for oncological diagnoses at a single centre between 1980 and 2017 was performed. A total of 51 patients were identified with 56 endoprosthetic implants with cross-pin fixation, 21 of which were implanted following primary resection of tumour. Locations included distal femoral (n = 36), proximal femoral (n = 7), intercalary (n = 6), proximal humeral (n = 3), proximal tibial (n = 3), and distal humeral (n = 1).Aims
Patients and Methods
We investigated the functional outcome in patients
who underwent reverse shoulder replacement (RSR) after removal of
a tumour of the proximal humerus. A total of 16 patients (ten women
and six men) underwent this procedure between 1998 and 2011 in our
hospital. Five patients died and one was lost to follow-up. Ten
patients were available for review at a mean follow-up of 46 months
(12 to 136). Eight patients had a primary and two patients a secondary
bone tumour. At final follow up the mean range of active movement was: abduction
78° (30° to 150°); flexion 98° (45° to 180°); external rotation
32° (10° to 60°); internal rotation 51° (10° to 80°). The mean Musculoskeletal
Tumor Society score was 77% (60% to 90%) and the mean Toronto Extremity
Salvage Score was 70% (30% to 91%). Two patients had a superficial
infection and one had a deep infection and underwent a two-stage
revision procedure. In two patients there was loosening of the RSR;
one dislocated twice. All patients had some degree of atrophy or
pseudo-atrophy of the deltoid muscle. Use of a RSR in patients with a tumour of the proximal humerus
gives acceptable results. Cite this article:
The August 2012 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: prolonged symptom duration; peri-operative mortality and above-knee amputation; giant cell tumour of the spine; surgical resection for Ewing’s sarcoma; intercalary allograft reconstruction of the femur for tumour defects; and an induced membrane technique for large bone defects.
The sacrum is frequently invaded by a pelvic tumour. The aim
of this study was to review our experience of treating this group
of patients and to identify the feasibility of a new surgical classification
in the management of these tumours. We reviewed 141 patients who, between 2005 and 2014, had undergone
surgical excision of a pelvic tumour with invasion of the sacrum. In a new classification, pelvisacral (Ps) I, II, and III resections
refer to a sagittal osteotomy through the ipsilateral wing of the
sacrum, through the sacral midline, or lateral to the contralateral
sacral foramina, respectively. A Ps a resection describes a pelvic
osteotomy through the ilium and a Ps b resection describes a concurrent
resection of the acetabulum with osteotomies performed through the
pubis and ischium or the pubic symphysis. Within each type, surgical
approaches were standardized to guide resection of the tumour.Aims
Patients and Methods
Endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of 31 tumours of the proximal femur in 30 patients was performed using a Wagner SL femoral revision stem. The mean follow-up was 25.6 months (0.6 to 130.0). Of the 28 patients with a metastasis, 27 died within a mean follow-up period of 18.1 months (0.6 to 56.3) after the operation, and the remaining patient was excluded from the study 44.4 months post-operatively when the stem was removed. The two patients with primary bone tumours were still alive at the latest follow-up of 81.0 and 130.0 months, respectively. One stem only was removed for suspected low-grade infection 44.4 months post-operatively. The worst-case survival rate with removal of the stem for any cause and/or loss to follow-up was 80.0% (95% confidence interval 44.9 to 100) at 130.0 months. The mean Karnofsky index increased from 44.2% (20% to 70%) pre-operatively to 59.7% (0% to 100%) post-operatively, and the mean Merle d’Aubigné score improved from 4.5 (0 to 15) to 12.0 (0 to 18). The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 62.4% (3.3% to 100%). The Wagner SL femoral revision stem offers an alternative to special tumour prostheses for the treatment of primary and secondary tumours of the proximal femur. The mid-term results are very promising, but long-term experience is necessary.
The use of a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis in the management
of primary bone tumours in children is well established. However,
the efficacy of such a prosthesis in those requiring a revision
procedure has yet to be established. The aim of this series was
to present our results using extendable prostheses for the revision
of previous endoprostheses. All patients who had a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis inserted
at the time of a revision procedure were identified from our database.
A total of 21 patients (seven female patients, 14 male) with a mean
age of 20.4 years (10 to 41) at the time of revision were included.
The indications for revision were mechanical failure, trauma or infection
with a residual leg-length discrepancy. The mean follow-up was 70
months (17 to 128). The mean shortening prior to revision was 44 mm
(10 to 100). Lengthening was performed in all but one patient with
a mean lengthening of 51 mm (5 to 140).Aims
Patients and Methods
Reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of a periacetabular
malignancy is technically challenging and many different techniques
have been used with varying success. Our aim was to prepare a systematic
review of the literature dealing with these techniques in order
to clarify the management, the rate of complications and the outcomes. A search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for English language
articles published between January 1990 and February 2017 with combinations
of key search terms to identify studies dealing with periacetabular
resection with reconstruction in patients with a malignancy. Studies
in English that reported radiographic or clinical outcomes were
included. Data collected from each study included: the number and
type of reconstructions, the pathological diagnosis of the lesions,
the mean age and follow-up, gender distribution, implant survivorship, complications,
functional outcome, and mortality. The results from individual studies
were combined for the general analysis, and then grouped according
to the type of reconstruction. Aims
Patients and Methods
We present a retrospective review of patients treated with extracorporeally
irradiated allografts for primary and secondary bone tumours with
the mid- and long-term survivorship and the functional and radiographic
outcomes. A total of 113 of 116 (97.4%) patients who were treated with
extracorporeally irradiated allografts between 1996 and 2014 were
followed up. Forms of treatment included reconstructions, prostheses
and composite reconstructions, both with and without vascularised
grafts. Survivorship was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor
Society (MSTS) scoring system, the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score
(TESS) and Quality of Life-C30 (QLQ-30) measures. Radiographic outcomes
were assessed using the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS)
radiographic scoring system.Aims
Patients and Methods
Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal tibia and ankle joint for a primary bone tumour is a rarely attempted and technically challenging procedure. We report the outcome of six patients treated between 1981 and 2007. There were four males and two females, with a mean age of 43.5 years (15 to 75), and a mean follow-up of 9.6 years (1 to 27). No patient developed a local recurrence or metastasis. Two of the six went on to have a below-knee amputation for persistent infection after a mean 16 months (1 to 31). The four patients who retained their endoprosthesis had a mean musculoskeletal tumour society score of 70% and a mean Toronto extremity salvage score of 71%. All were pain free and able to perform most activities of daily living in comfort. A custom-made endoprosthetic replacement of the distal tibia and ankle joint is a viable treatment option for carefully selected patients with a primary bone tumour. Patients should, however, be informed of the risk of infection and the potential need for amputation if this cannot be controlled.
Giant cell tumours (GCTs) of the small bones
of the hands and feet are rare. Small case series have been published but
there is no consensus about ideal treatment. We performed a systematic
review, initially screening 775 titles, and included 12 papers comprising
91 patients with GCT of the small bones of the hands and feet. The
rate of recurrence across these publications was found to be 72%
(18 of 25) in those treated with isolated curettage, 13% (2 of 15)
in those treated with curettage plus adjuvants, 15% (6 of 41) in
those treated by resection and 10% (1 of 10) in those treated by
amputation. We then retrospectively analysed 30 patients treated for GCT
of the small bones of the hands and feet between 1987 and 2010 in
five specialised centres. The primary treatment was curettage in
six, curettage with adjuvants (phenol or liquid nitrogen with or
without polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)) in 18 and resection in six.
We evaluated the rate of complications and recurrence as well as
the factors that influenced their functional outcome. At a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (2 to 26) the rate of recurrence
was 50% (n = 3) in those patients treated with isolated curettage,
22% (n = 4) in those treated with curettage plus adjuvants and 17%
(n = 1) in those treated with resection (p = 0.404). The only complication
was pain in one patient, which resolved after surgical removal of remnants
of PMMA. We could not identify any individual factors associated
with a higher rate of complications or recurrence. The mean post-operative
Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores were slightly higher after
intra-lesional treatment including isolated curettage and curettage
plus adjuvants (29 (20 to 30)) compared with resection (25 (15 to
30)) (p = 0.091). Repeated curettage with adjuvants eventually resulted
in the cure for all patients and is therefore a reasonable treatment
for both primary and recurrent GCT of the small bones of the hands
and feet. Cite this article:
Resection of a primary sarcoma of the diaphysis
of a long bone creates a large defect. The biological options for reconstruction
include the use of a vascularised and non-vascularised fibular autograft. The purpose of the present study was to compare these methods
of reconstruction. Between 1985 and 2007, 53 patients (26 male and 27 female) underwent
biological reconstruction of a diaphyseal defect after resection
of a primary sarcoma. Their mean age was 20.7 years (3.6 to 62.4).
Of these, 26 (49 %) had a vascularised and 27 (51 %) a non-vascularised
fibular autograft. Either method could have been used for any patient in
the study. The mean follow-up was 52 months (12 to 259). Oncological,
surgical and functional outcome were evaluated. Kaplan–Meier analysis
was performed for graft survival with major complication as the
end point. At final follow-up, eight patients had died of disease. Primary
union was achieved in 40 patients (75%); 22 (42%) with a vascularised
fibular autograft and 18 (34%) a non-vascularised (p = 0.167). A
total of 32 patients (60%) required revision surgery. Kaplan–Meier
analysis revealed a mean survival without complication of 36 months
(0.06 to 107.3, Both groups seem to be reliable biological methods of reconstructing
a diaphyseal bone defect. Vascularised autografts require more revisions
mainly due to problems with wound healing in distal sites of tumour,
such as the foot. Cite this article:
The current indications for functional restoration
of extension of the knee following quadriceps resection or loss require
reappraisal. The contribution of pedicled and free functional muscle
transfer is likely to be over-emphasised in many studies, with good
functional outcomes predominantly reported only in the context of
cases with residual quadriceps function. In cases with total quadriceps
resection or loss, all forms of reconstruction perform poorly. Furthermore,
in smaller resections with loss of two or fewer components of the
quadriceps, minimal impairment of function occurs in the absence
of functional reconstruction, suggesting that functional restoration
may not be warranted. Thus there is a paradox in the current approach
to quadriceps reconstruction, in that small resections are likely
to be over-treated and large resections remain under-treated. This review suggests a shift is required in the approach and
rationale for reconstructing functional extension of the knee after
quadriceps resection or loss. A classification based on current
evidence is suggested that emphasises more clearly the indications
and rationale for functional transfers.
