Joint-preserving surgery of the hip (JPSH) has evolved considerably
and now includes a number of procedures, including arthroscopy,
surgical dislocation, and redirectional osteotomies of the femur
and acetabulum. There are a number of different factors which lead
to failure of JPSH. Consequently, it is of interest to assess the
various modes of failure in order to continue to identify best practice
and the indications for these procedures. Using a retrospective observational study design, we reviewed
1013 patients who had undergone JPSH by a single surgeon between
2005 and 2015. There were 509 men and 504 women with a mean age
of 39 years (16 to 78). Of the 1013 operations, 783 were arthroscopies,
122 surgical dislocations, and 108 peri-acetabular osteotomies (PAO).
We analysed the overall failure rates and modes of failure. Re-operations
were categorised into four groups: Mode 1 was arthritis progression
or organ failure leading to total hip arthroplasty (THA); Mode 2
was an Incorrect diagnosis/procedure; Mode 3 resulted from malcorrection
of femur (type A), acetabulum (type B), or labrum (type C) and Mode 4
resulted from an unintended consequence of the initial surgical
intervention.Aims
Patients and Methods
Our aim was to analyse the long-term functional outcome of two
forms of surgical treatment for active patients aged >
70 years
with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. Patients
were randomised to be treated with either a hemiarthroplasty or
a total hip arthroplasty (THA). The outcome five years post-operatively
for this cohort has previously been reported. We present the outcome
at 12 years post-operatively. Initially 252 patients with a mean age of 81.1 years (70.2 to
95.6) were included, of whom 205 (81%) were women. A total of 137
were treated with a cemented hemiarthroplasty and 115 with a cemented
THA. At long-term follow-up we analysed the modified Harris Hip
Score (HHS), post-operative complications and intra-operative data
of the patients who were still alive.Aims
Patients and Methods
Preservation of posterior condylar offset (PCO) has been shown to correlate with improved functional results after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Whether this is also the case for revision TKA, remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the independent effect of PCO on early functional outcome after revision TKA. A total of 107 consecutive aseptic revision TKAs were performed by a single surgeon during an eight-year period. The mean age was 69.4 years (39 to 85) and there were 59 female patients and 48 male patients. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Short-form (SF)-12 score were assessed pre-operatively and one year post-operatively. Patient satisfaction was also assessed at one year. Joint line and PCO were assessed radiographically at one year.Objectives
Methods
Macrodactyly of the foot is a rare but disabling
condition. We present the results of surgery on 18 feet of 16 patients, who
underwent ray amputation and were followed-up for more than two
years at a mean of 80 months (25 to 198). We radiologically measured the intermetatarsal width and forefoot
area pre-operatively and at six weeks and two years after surgery.
We also evaluated the clinical results using the Oxford Ankle Foot
Questionnaire for children (OxAFQ-C) and the Questionnaire for Foot
Macrodactyly. The intermetatarsal width and forefoot area ratios were significantly
decreased after surgery. The mean OxAFQ-C score was 42 (16 to 57)
pre-operatively, improving to 47 (5 to 60) at two years post-operatively
(p = 0.021). The mean questionnaire for Foot Macrodactyly score
two years after surgery was 8 (6 to 10). Ray amputation gave a measurable reduction in foot size with
excellent functional results. For patients with metatarsal involvement,
a motionless toe, or involvement of multiple digits, ray amputation
is a clinically effective option which is acceptable to patients. Cite this article:
To demonstrate, with concrete examples, the value of in-depth
exploration and comparison of data published in National Joint Arthroplasty
registry reports. The author reviewed published current reports of National Joint
Arthroplasty registries for findings of current significance to
current orthopaedic practice.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the survivorship and radiographic
outcomes at ten-year follow-up of three prospective consecutive
series of patients each of which received a different design of
cementless femoral components for total hip arthroplasty (THA). In Cohort 1, 91 consecutive patients (100 hips) underwent THA
with a cementless porous-coated anatomic femoral stem (PCA) between
October 1983 and January 1986. In Cohort 2, 86 consecutive patients
(100 hips) underwent THA with an extensively porous-coated cementless
femoral stem (Prodigy) between June 1994 and October 1997. In Cohort
3, 88 consecutive patients (100 hips) underwent THA with a proximally
porous-coated triple-tapered cementless stem (Summit) between April
2002 and October 2003. All three groups underwent prospective clinical
and radiographic evaluation.Aims
Patients and Methods
Valgus knee deformity can present a number of
unique surgical challenges for the total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
surgeon. Understanding the typical patterns of bone and soft-tissue pathology
in the valgus arthritic knee is critical for appropriate surgical
planning. This review aims to provide the knee arthroplasty surgeon
with an understanding of surgical management strategies for the
treatment of valgus knee arthritis. Lateral femoral and tibial deficiencies, contracted lateral soft
tissues, attenuated medial soft tissues, and multiplanar deformities
may all be present in the valgus arthritic knee. A number of classifications
have been reported in order to guide surgical management, and a variety
of surgical strategies have been described with satisfactory clinical
results. Depending on the severity of the deformity, a variety of
TKA implant designs may be appropriate for use. Regardless of an operating surgeon’s preferred surgical strategy,
adherence to a step-wise approach to deformity correction is advised. Cite this article:
The August 2015 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Steroids may be useful in avoiding dysphagia in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF); Perhaps X-Stop ought to stop?; Is cervical plexus block in ACDF the gateway to day case spinal surgery?; Epidural past its heyday?; Steroids in lumbar back pain; Lumbar disc replacement improving; Post-discectomy arthritis
The December 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Albumin and complications in knee arthroplasty; Tantalum: a knee fixation for all seasons?; Dynamic knee alignment; Tibial component design in UKA; Managing the tidal wave of revision knee arthroplasty; Scoring pain in TKR; Does anyone have a ‘normal’ tibial slope?; XLPE in TKR? A five-year clinical study; Spacers and infected revision arthroplasties; Dialysis and arthroplasty
There are two techniques widely used to determine the rotational
alignment of the components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); gap
balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR). Which technique is the
best remains controversial. We aimed to investigate this in a systematic
review and meta-analysis. In accordance with the methods of Cochrane, databases were searched
for all randomised controlled trials in the literature between January
1986 and June 2015 comparing radiographic and clinical outcomes
between the use of these two tecniques. Meta-analysis involved the
use of the Revman5.3 software provided by Cochrane collaboration.Aims
Materials and Methods
This review summarises the technique of impaction
grafting with mesh augmentation for the treatment of uncontained
acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. The ideal acetabular revision should restore bone stock, use
a small socket in the near-anatomic position, and provide durable
fixation. Impaction bone grafting, which has been in use for over
40 years, offers the ability to achieve these goals in uncontained
defects. The precepts of modern, revision impaction grafting are
that the segmental or cavitary defects must be supported with a
mesh; the contained cavity is filled with vigorously impacted morselised
fresh-frozen allograft; and finally, acrylic cement is used to stabilise
the graft and provide rigid, long-lasting fixation of the revised
acetabular component. Favourable results have been published with this technique. While
having its limitations, it is a viable option to address large acetabular
defects in revision arthroplasty. Cite this article:
The optimal management of intracapsular fractures of the femoral
neck in independently mobile patients remains open to debate. Successful
fixation obviates the limitations of arthroplasty for this group
of patients. However, with fixation failure rates as high as 30%,
the outcome of revision surgery to salvage total hip arthroplasty
(THA) must be considered. We carried out a systematic review to
compare the outcomes of salvage THA and primary THA for intracapsular
fractures of the femoral neck. We performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews
and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) compliant systematic review, using the
PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane libraries databases. A meta-analysis
was performed where possible, and a narrative synthesis when a meta-analysis
was not possible.Aims
Patients and Methods
The highly cross-linked polyethylene Exeter RimFit flanged cemented
acetabular component was introduced in the United Kingdom in 2010.
This study aimed to examine the rates of emergence of radiolucent
lines observed when the Rimfit acetabular component was implanted
at total hip arthroplasty (THA) using two different techniques: firstly,
the ‘rimcutter’ technique in which the flange sits on a pre-prepared
acetabular rim; and secondly, the ‘trimmed flange’ technique in
which the flange is trimmed and the acetabular component is seated
inside the rim of the acetabulum. The radiographs of 150 THAs (75 ‘rimcutter’, 75 ‘trimmed flange’)
involving this component were evaluated to assess for radiolucencies
at the cement/bone interface by three observers. Aims
Patients and Methods
We describe the use of a protocol of irrigation and debridement
(I&
D) with retention of the implant for the treatment of periprosthetic
infection of a total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). This may be an attractive
alternative to staged re-implantation. Between 1990 and 2010, 23 consecutive patients were treated in
this way. Three were lost to follow-up leaving 20 patients (21 TEAs)
in the study. There were six men and 14 women. Their mean age was
58 years (23 to 76). The protocol involved: component unlinking,
irrigation and debridement (I&
D), and the introduction of antibiotic
laden cement beads; organism-specific intravenous antibiotics; repeat
I&
D and re-linkage of the implant if appropriate; long-term
oral antibiotic therapy. Aims
Patients and Methods
Instability is a common indication for early
revision after both primary and revision total knee arthroplasty
(TKA), accounting for up to 20% in the literature. The number of
TKAs performed annually continues to climb exponentially, thus having
an effective algorithm for treatment is essential. This relies on
a thorough pre- and intra-operative assessment of the patient. The
underlying cause of the instability must be identified initially
and subsequently, the surgeon must be able to balance the flexion
and extension gaps and be comfortable using a variety of constrained
implants. This review describes the assessment of the unstable TKA, and
the authors’ preferred form of treatment for these difficult cases
where the source of instability is often multifactorial. Cite this article:
The last decade has seen a considerable increase
in the use of in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) to treat patients
with end-stage arthritis of the ankle. However, the longevity of
the implants is still far from that of total knee and hip arthroplasties. The aim of this review is to outline a diagnostic and treatment
algorithm for the painful TAA to be used when considering revision
surgery. Cite this article:
The acetabular labrum is a soft-tissue structure
which lines the acetabular rim of the hip joint. Its role in hip
joint biomechanics and joint health has been of particular interest
over the past decade. In normal hip joint biomechanics, the labrum
is crucial in retaining a layer of pressurised intra-articular fluid
for joint lubrication and load support/distribution. Its seal around
the femoral head is further regarded as a contributing to hip stability through
its suction effect. The labrum itself is also important in increasing
contact area thereby reducing contact stress. Given the labrum’s
role in normal hip joint biomechanics, surgical techniques for managing
labral damage are continuously evolving as our understanding of
its anatomy and function continue to progress. The current paper
aims to review the anatomy and biomechanical function of the labrum
and how they are affected by differing surgical techniques. Take home message: The acetabular labrum plays a critical role
in hip function and maintaining and restoring its function during
surgical intervention remain an essential goal. Cite this article:
Hip resurfacing has been proposed as an alternative
to traditional total hip arthroplasty in young, active patients.
Much has been learned following the introduction of metal-on-metal resurfacing
devices in the 1990s. The triad of a well-designed device, implanted
accurately, in the correct patient has never been more critical
than with these implants. Following Food and Drug Administration approval in 2006, we studied
the safety and effectiveness of one hip resurfacing device (Birmingham
Hip Resurfacing) at our hospital in a large, single-surgeon series.
We report our early to mid–term results in 1333 cases followed for
a mean of 4.3 years (2 to 5.7) using a prospective, observational
registry. The mean patient age was 53.1 years (12 to 84); 70% were
male and 91% had osteoarthritis. Complications were few, including
no dislocations, no femoral component loosening, two femoral neck
fractures (0.15%), one socket loosening (0.08%), three deep infections
(0.23%), and three cases of metallosis (0.23%). There were no destructive
pseudotumours. Overall survivorship at up to 5.7 years was 99.2%. Aseptic survivorship
in males under the age of 50 was 100%. We believe this is the largest
United States series of a single surgeon using a single resurfacing
system. Cite this article:
