The December 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Albumin and complications in knee arthroplasty; Tantalum: a knee fixation for all seasons?; Dynamic knee alignment; Tibial component design in UKA; Managing the tidal wave of revision knee arthroplasty; Scoring pain in TKR; Does anyone have a ‘normal’ tibial slope?; XLPE in TKR? A five-year clinical study; Spacers and infected revision arthroplasties; Dialysis and arthroplasty
We present a minimum 20-year follow-up study of 382 cemented
Exeter Universal total hip arthroplasties (350 patients) operated
on at a mean age of 66.3 years (17 to 94). All patients received the same design of femoral component, regardless
of the original diagnosis. Previous surgery had been undertaken
for 33 hips (8.6%). During the study period 218 patients with 236
hips (62%) died, 42 hips (11%) were revised and 110 hips (29%) in
96 patients were available for review. The acetabular components
were varied and some designs are now obsolete, however they were
all cemented.Aims
Patients and Methods
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a cost effective
and extremely successful operation. As longevity increases, the demand
for primary TKA will continue to rise. The success and survivorship
of TKAs are dependent on the demographics of the patient, surgical
technique and implant-related factors. Currently the risk of failure of a TKA requiring revision surgery
ten years post-operatively is 5%. The most common indications for revision include aseptic loosening
(29.8%), infection (14.8%), and pain (9.5%). Revision surgery poses
considerable clinical burdens on patients and financial burdens
on healthcare systems. We present a current concepts review on the epidemiology of failed
TKAs using data from worldwide National Joint Registries. Cite this article:
Little is known about the relative outcomes of revision of unicompartmental
knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) to total
knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to compare the
outcomes of revision surgery for the two procedures in terms of
complications, re-revision and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
at a minimum of two years follow-up. This study was a retrospective review of data from an institutional
arthroplasty registry for cases performed between 2001 and 2014.
A total of 292 patients were identified, of which 217 had a revision
of HTO to TKA, and 75 had revision of UKA to TKA. While mean follow-up
was longer for the HTO group compared with the UKA group, patient
demographics (age, body mass index and Charlson co-morbidity index)
and PROMs (Short Form-36, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score,
both objective and functional) were similar in the two groups prior
to revision surgery. Outcomes included the rate of complications
and
re-operation, PROMS and patient-reported satisfaction at six months
and two years post-operatively. We also compared the duration of
surgery and the need for revision implants in the two groups. Aims
Patients and Methods
We report on the outcome of the Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented
all-polyethylene acetabular component with a mean follow-up of 12
years (10 to 13.9). This study reviewed 203 hips in 194 patients.
129 hips in 122 patients are still A retrospective review was undertaken of a consecutive series
of 203 routine primary cemented total hip arthroplasties (THA) in
194 patients.Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the impact of
intravenous tranexamic acid on the reduction of blood loss, transfusion
rate, and early post-operative clinical outcome in total shoulder
arthroplasty. A randomised, placebo-controlled trial which included 54 patients
undergoing unilateral primary stemless anatomical or stemmed reverse
total shoulder arthroplasty was undertaken. Patients received either
100 ml saline (placebo, n = 27), or 100 ml saline together with
1000 mg of tranexamic acid (TXA, n = 27) intravenously prior to
skin incision and during wound closure. Peri-operative blood loss
via an intra-articular drain was recorded and total blood loss was
calculated. The post-operative transfusion rate was documented.
Assessment of early clinical parameters included the visual analogue
scale for pain (VAS), documentation of haematoma formation and adverse events.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of aseptic
loosening after the use of a cemented acetabular component and a
Trabecular Metal (TM) acetabular component (Zimmer Inc., Warsaw,
Indiana) at acetabular revision with bone impaction grafting. A total of 42 patients were included in the study. Patients were
randomised to receive an all- polyethylene cemented acetabular component
(n = 19) or a TM component (n = 23). Radiostereometric analysis
and conventional radiographic examinations were performed regularly
up to two years post-operatively or until further revision.Aims
Patients and Methods
The February 2013 Knee Roundup360 looks at: mobile-bearing TKRs; arthroscopic ACL reconstruction; the use of chondrocytes for osteochondral defects; ACL reconstruction and the return to pivoting sports; ACLs and the MOON study; the benefit of knee navigation; and trabecular metal.
The aim of this prospective randomised study
was to compare the clinical and radiological results of a cemented
all-polyethylene Ultima acetabular component with those of a cementless
porous-coated acetabular component (PFC) following total hip replacement
(THR). A total of 287 patients received either a polyethylene acetabular
component (group A) or a cobalt–chromium porous-coated component
(group B) with an identical cemented femoral component and 28 mm
cobalt-chromium head, thus making it the largest study of its type.
Patients were evaluated radiologically and clinically using the
Harris hip score (HHS). Group A comprised 183 patients (73 male,
110 female) with a mean age of
71.3 years (55 to 89). Group B comprised 104 patients (48 male,
56 female) with a mean age of 69.8 years (56 to 89). A total of
16 patients (13 in Group A, three in Group B) did not have post-operative
data for analysis. The mean follow-up in group A was 7.52 years
(0.4 to 15.0) and in Group B 7.87 years (0.5 to 14.0). At final follow-up the mean HHS was similar between groups A
and B (74.5 (25 to 100) and 78.0 (37 to 100), respectively; p =
0.068). The total number of revisions for any cause was 28, 17 of
which were in group A and 11 in group B. The ten-year survivorship
was 86.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78.4 to 92.1) and 89.2%
(95% CI 78.3 to 94.8) for groups A and B, respectively (log-rank
p-value = 0.938). A total of 20 cemented and two cementless acetabular
components had evidence of acetabular radiolucencies or acetabular
component migration at last follow-up (p = 0.001). These results indicate that patients with a cemented all-polyethylene
and cementless porous-coated polyethylene lined acetabular component
have similar long-term clinical outcomes.
Dysplasia of the hip, hypotonia, osteopenia,
ligamentous laxity, and mental retardation increase the complexity
of performing and managing patients with Down syndrome who require
total hip replacement (THR). We identified 14 patients (six males,
eight females, 21 hips) with Down syndrome and degenerative disease
of the hip who underwent THR, with a minimum follow-up of two years
from 1969 to 2009. In seven patients, bilateral THRs were performed
while the rest had unilateral THRs. The mean clinical follow-up
was 5.8 years (standard deviation ( Cite this article:
The October 2014 Knee Roundup360 looks at: microfracture equivalent to OATS; examination better than MRI in predicting hamstrings re-injury; a second view on return to play with hamstrings injuries; dislocation risks in the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee; what about the tibia?; getting on top of lateral facet pain post TKR; readmission in TKR; patient-specific instrumentation; treating infrapatellar saphenous neuralgia; and arthroscopy in the middle-aged.
Reconstruction of the acetabulum after failed total hip arthroplasty
(THA) can be a surgical challenge in the presence of severe bone
loss. We report the long-term survival of a porous tantalum revision
acetabular component, its radiological appearance and quality of
life outcomes. We reviewed the results of 46 patients who had undergone revision
of a failed acetabular component with a Paprosky II or III bone
defect and reconstruction with a hemispherical, tantalum acetabular
component, supplementary screws and a cemented polyethylene liner.Aims
Patients and Methods
The December 2013 Research Roundup360 looks at: Inflammation implicated in FAI; Ponseti and effective teaching; Unicompartmental knee design and tibial strain; Bisphosphonates and fracture healing; Antibiosis in cement; Zoledronic acid improves primary stability in revision?; Osteoporotic fractures revisited; and electroarthrography for monitoring of cartilage degeneration
In this prospective study we studied the effect
of the inclination angle of the acetabular component on polyethylene wear
and component migration in cemented acetabular sockets using radiostereometric
analysis. A total of 120 patients received either a cemented Reflection
All-Poly ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene or a cemented
Reflection All-Poly highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular
component, combined with either cobalt–chrome or Oxinium femoral
heads. Femoral head penetration and migration of the acetabular
component were assessed with repeated radiostereometric analysis
for two years. The inclination angle was measured on a standard
post-operative anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. Linear regression
analysis was used to determine the relationship between the inclination
angle and femoral head penetration and migration of the acetabular component. We found no relationship between the inclination angle and penetration
of the femoral head at two years’ follow-up (p = 0.9). Similarly,
our data failed to reveal any statistically significant correlation
between inclination angle and migration of these cemented acetabular
components (p = 0.07 to p = 0.9).
We assessed the clinical results, radiographic
outcomes and complications of patients undergoing total shoulder replacement
(TSR) for osteoarthritis with concurrent repair of a full-thickness
rotator cuff tear. Between 1996 and 2010, 45 of 932 patients (4.8%)
undergoing TSR for osteoarthritis underwent rotator cuff repair.
The final study group comprised 33 patients with a mean follow-up
of 4.7 years (3 months to 13 years). Tears were classified into small
(10), medium (14), large (9) or massive (0). On a scale of 1 to
5, pain decreased from a mean of 4.7 to 1.7 (p = <
0.0001), the
mean forward elevation improved from 99° to 139° (p = <
0.0001),
and the mean external rotation improved from 20° (0° to 75°) to
49° (20° to 80°) (p = <
0.0001). The improvement in elevation
was greater in those with a small tear (p = 0.03). Radiographic
evidence of instability developed in six patients with medium or
large tears, indicating lack of rotator cuff healing. In all, six
glenoid components, including one with instability, were radiologically
at risk of loosening. Complications were noted in five patients,
all with medium or large tears; four of these had symptomatic instability
and one sustained a late peri-prosthetic fracture. Four patients
(12%) required further surgery, three with instability and one with
a peri-prosthetic humeral fracture. Consideration should be given to performing rotator cuff repair
for stable shoulders during anatomical TSR, but reverse replacement
should be considered for older, less active patients with larger
tears. Cite this article:
The first 325 Exeter Universal stems (309 patients) implanted at the originating centre were inserted between March 1988 and February 1990 by a group of surgeons with differing experience. In this report we describe the clinical and radiological results at a mean of 15.7 years (14.7 to 17.3) after operation with no loss to follow-up. There were 97 patients (108 hips) with replacements still in situ and 31 (31 hips) who had undergone a further procedure. With an endpoint of revision for aseptic loosening, the survivorship at 17 years was 100% and 90.4% for the femoral and acetabular component, respectively. The mean Merle D’Aubigné and Postel scores at review were 5.4 (
Most published randomised controlled trials which
compare the rates of wear of conventional and cross-linked (XL) polyethylene
(PE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have described their use with
a cementless acetabular component. We conducted a prospective randomised study to assess the rates
of penetration of two distinct types of PE in otherwise identical
cemented all-PE acetabular components. A total of 100 consecutive patients for THA were randomised to
receive an acetabular component which had been either highly XL
then remelted or moderately XL then annealed. After a minimum of eight years follow-up, 38 hips in the XL group
and 30 hips in the annealed group had complete data (mean follow-up
of 9.1 years (7.6 to 10.7) and 8.7 years (7.2 to 10.2), respectively).
In the XL group, the steady state rate of penetration from one year
onwards was -0.0002 mm/year ( These results show that the yearly linear rate of femoral head
penetration can be significantly reduced by using a highly XLPE
cemented acetabular component. Cite this article:
Oxidised zirconium was introduced as a material for femoral components
in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as an attempt to reduce polyethylene
wear. However, the long-term survival of this component is not known. We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected
database to assess the ten year survival and clinical and radiological
outcomes of an oxidised zirconium total knee arthroplasty with the
Genesis II prosthesis. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis
Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
and a patient satisfaction scale were used to assess outcome.Aims
Methods
There has been a recent increase in interest
for non-cemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however
the superiority of cement fixation is an ongoing debate. Whereas the results based on Level III and IV evidence show similar
survivorship rates between the two types of fixation, Level I and
II evidence strongly support cemented fixation. United Kingdom,
Australia, Sweden, and New Zealand registry data show lower failure
rates and greater usage of cemented than non-cemented fixation.
Case series studies have also indicated greater functional outcomes
and lower revision rates among cemented TKAs. Non-cemented fixation
involves more patellofemoral complications, including increased
susceptibility to wear due to a thinner polyethylene bearing on
the cementless metal-backed component. The combination of results
from registry data, prospective randomised studies, and meta-analyses
support the current superiority of cemented fixation in TKAs.
The optimum cementing technique for the tibial
component in cemented primary total knee replacement (TKR) remains
controversial. The technique of cementing, the volume of cement
and the penetration are largely dependent on the operator, and hence
large variations can occur. Clinical, experimental and computational
studies have been performed, with conflicting results. Early implant
migration is an indication of loosening. Aseptic loosening is the
most common cause of failure in primary TKR and is the product of
several factors. Sufficient penetration of cement has been shown
to increase implant stability. This review discusses the relevant literature regarding all aspects
of the cementing of the tibial component at primary TKR. Cite this article:
