The June 2014 Knee Roundup360 looks at: acute repair preferable in hamstring ruptures; osteoarthritis a given in ACL injury, even with reconstruction?; chicken and egg: patellofemoral dysfunction and hip weakness; meniscal root tears as bad as we thought; outcomes in the meniscus; topical NSAIDs have a measurable effect on synovitis; nailing for tibial peri-prosthetic fracture.
We reviewed the long-term clinical and radiological
results of 63 uncemented Low Contact Stress (LCS) total knee replacements
(TKRs) in 47 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The mean age of
the patients at the time of surgery was 69 years (53 to 81). At
a mean follow-up of 22 years (20 to 25), 12 patients were alive
(17 TKRs), 27 had died (36 TKRs), and eight (ten TKRs) were lost
to follow-up. Revision was necessary in seven patients (seven TKRs, 11.1%)
at a mean of 12.1 years (0 to 19) after surgery. In the surviving
ten patients who had not undergone revision (15 TKRs), the mean
Oxford knee score was 30.2 (16 to 41) at a mean follow-up of 19.5
years (15 to 24.7) and mean active flexion was 105° (90° to 150°).
The survival rate was 88.9% at 20 years (56 of 63) and the Kaplan–Meier
survival estimate, without revision, was 80.2% (95% confidence interval
37 to 100) at 25 years. Cite this article:
We have investigated whether shape of the knee
can predict the clinical outcome of patients after an anterior cruciate
ligament rupture. We used statistical shape modelling to measure
the shape of the knee joint of 182 prospectively followed patients
on lateral and Rosenberg view radiographs of the knee after a rupture
of the anterior cruciate ligament. Subsequently, we associated knee
shape with the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective
score at two years follow-up. The mean age of patients was 31 years
(21 to 51), the majority were male (n = 121) and treated operatively
(n = 135). We found two modes (shape variations) that were significantly
associated with the subjective score at two years: one for the operatively
treated group (p = 0.002) and one for the non-operatively treated
group (p = 0.003). Operatively treated patients who had higher subjective
scores had a smaller intercondylar notch and a smaller width of
the intercondylar eminence. Non-operatively treated patients who
scored higher on the subjective score had a more pyramidal intercondylar
notch as opposed to one that was more dome-shaped. We conclude that
the shape of the femoral notch and the intercondylar eminence is predictive
of clinical outcome two years after a rupture of the anterior cruciate
ligament. Cite this article:
The June 2014 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Modular femoral necks: early signs are not good; is corrosion to blame for modular neck failures; metal-on-metal is not quite a closed book; no excess failures in fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures; noise no problem in hip replacement; heterotopic ossification after hip arthroscopy: are NSAIDs the answer?; thrombotic and bleeding events surprisingly low in total joint replacement; and the elephant in the room: complications and surgical volume.
The April 2014 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at: arthroscopic capsular release successful after six months; MCIC in cuff surgery; analgesia following arthroscopic cuff repair; platelet-rich fibrin; and cuff tear and suprascapular nerve neuropathy?
The April 2014 Research Roundup360 looks at: scientific writing needed in orthopaedic papers; antiseptics and osteoblasts; thromboembolic management in orthopaedic patients; nicotine and obesity in post-operative complications; defining the “Patient Acceptable Symptom State”; and cheap and nasty implants of poor quality.
The outcome of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) deteriorates
with time, and additional procedures may be required. The aim of
this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes
between unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and total knee replacement
(TKR) after HTO as well as after primary UKR. A total of 63 patients (63
knees) were studied retrospectively and divided into three groups:
UKR after HTO (group A; n = 22), TKR after HTO (group B; n = 18)
and primary UKR (group C; n = 22). The Oxford knee score (OKS),
Knee Society score (KSS), hip–knee–ankle angles, mechanical axis
and patellar height were evaluated pre- and post-operatively. At
a mean of 64 months (19 to 180) post-operatively the mean OKS was
43.8 (33 to 49), 43.3 (30 to 48) and 42.5 (29 to 48) for groups
A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.73). The mean KSS knee score was
88.8 (54 to 100), 88.11 (51 to 100) and 85.3 (45 to 100) for groups
A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.65), and the mean KSS function score
was 85.0 (50 to 100) in group A, 85.8 (20 to 100) in group B and
79.3 (50 to 100) in group C (p = 0.48). Radiologically the results
were comparable for all groups except for patellar height, with
a higher incidence of patella infra following a previous HTO (p
= 0.02). Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to examine the
complications and outcomes of total hip replacement (THR) in super-obese
patients (body mass index (BMI) >
50 kg/m2) compared
with class I obese (BMI 30 to 34.9 kg/m2) and normal-weight
patients (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), as defined by the
World Health Organization. A total of 39 THRs were performed in 30 super-obese patients
with a mean age of 53 years (31 to 72), who were followed for a
mean of 4.2 years (2.0 to 11.7). This group was matched with two
cohorts of normal-weight and class I obese patients, each comprising
39 THRs in 39 patients. Statistical analysis was performed to determine differences
among these groups with respect to complications and satisfaction
based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis
index, the Harris hip score (HHS) and the Short-Form (SF)-12 questionnaire. Super-obese patients experienced significantly longer hospital
stays and higher rates of major complications and readmissions than
normal-weight and class I obese patients. Although super-obese patients
demonstrated reduced pre-operative and post-operative satisfaction
scores, there was no significant difference in improvement, or change in
the score, with respect to HHS or the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Super-obese patients obtain similar satisfaction outcomes as
class I obese and normal-weight patients with respect to improvement
in their scores. However, they experience a significant increase
in length of hospital stay and major complication and readmission
rates. Cite this article:
Satisfaction with care is important to both patients
and to those who pay for it. The Net Promoter Score (NPS), widely
used in the service industries, has been introduced into the NHS
as the ‘friends and family test’; an overarching measure of patient
satisfaction. It assesses the likelihood of the patient recommending
the healthcare received to another, and is seen as a discriminator
of healthcare performance. We prospectively assessed 6186 individuals
undergoing primary lower limb joint replacement at a single university
hospital to determine the Net Promoter Score for joint replacements
and to evaluate which factors contributed to the response. Achieving pain relief (odds ratio (OR) 2.13, confidence interval
(CI) 1.83 to 2.49), the meeting of pre-operative expectation (OR
2.57, CI 2.24 to 2.97), and the hospital experience (OR 2.33, CI
2.03 to 2.68) are the domains that explain whether a patient would
recommend joint replacement services. These three factors, combined
with the type of surgery undertaken (OR 2.31, CI 1.68 to 3.17),
drove a predictive model that was able to explain 95% of the variation
in the patient’s recommendation response. Though intuitively similar,
this ‘recommendation’ metric was found to be materially different
to satisfaction responses. The difference between THR (NPS 71) and
TKR (NPS 49) suggests that no overarching score for a department
should be used without an adjustment for case mix. However, the
Net Promoter Score does measure a further important dimension to
our existing metrics: the patient experience of healthcare delivery. Cite this article:
We present our experience of the modified Dunn
procedure in combination with a Ganz surgical dislocation of the hip
to treat patients with severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis
(SCFE). The aim was to prospectively investigate whether this technique
is safe and reproducible. We assessed the degree of reduction, functional
outcome, rate of complications, radiological changes and range of
movement in the hip. There were 28 patients with a mean follow-up
of 38.6 months (24 to 84). The lateral slip angle was corrected
by a mean of 50.9° (95% confidence interval 44.3 to 57.5). The mean
modified Harris hip score at the final follow-up was 89.1 ( Cite this article:
The February 2013 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: replacement in osteonecrosis of the talus; ankle instability in athletes; long-term follow-up of lateral ankle ligament reconstruction; an operation for Stage II TPD; whether you should operate on Achilles tendon ruptures; Weil osteotomies and Freiberg’s disease; MRI scanning not sensitive for intra-articular lesions; and single-stage debridement and reconstruction in Charcot feet.
The August 2013 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: are we getting it right first time?; tantalum augments in revision hip surgery; lower wear in dual mobility?; changing faces changes outcomes; synovial fluid aspiration in MOM hips; taper disease: the new epidemic of hip surgery; the super-obese and THR; and whether well fixed stems can remain in infected hips
The cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement
has been demonstrated to have superior fixation on radiographs and
a similar early complication rate compared with the cemented version.
However, a small number of cases have come to our attention where,
after an apparently successful procedure, the tibial component subsides into
a valgus position with an increased posterior slope, before becoming
well-fixed. We present the clinical and radiological findings of
these six patients and describe their natural history and the likely
causes. Two underwent revision in the early post-operative period,
and in four the implant stabilised and became well-fixed radiologically with
a good functional outcome. This situation appears to be avoidable by minor modifications
to the operative technique, and it appears that it can be treated
conservatively in most patients. Cite this article:
The February 2014 Wrist &
Hand Roundup360 looks at: simple debridement and ulnar-sided wrist pain; needle fasciotomy or collagenase injection; joint replacement in osteoarthritic knuckles; the Mannerfelt arthrodesis; scaphoid union rates with conservative treatment; the benefits of atorvastatin for muscle re-innervation after sciatic nerve transection; and complications of trapeziectomy.
We performed a randomised controlled trial comparing
computer-assisted surgery (CAS) with conventional surgery (CONV)
in total knee replacement (TKR). Between 2009 and 2011 a total of
192 patients with a mean age of 68 years (55 to 85) with osteoarthritis
or arthritic disease of the knee were recruited from four Norwegian
hospitals. At three months follow-up, functional results were marginally
better for the CAS group. Mean differences (MD) in favour of CAS
were found for the Knee Society function score (MD: 5.9, 95% confidence
interval (CI) 0.3 to 11.4, p = 0.039), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis
Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales for ‘pain’ (MD: 7.7, 95% CI 1.7 to
13.6, p = 0.012), ‘sports’ (MD: 13.5, 95% CI 5.6 to 21.4, p = 0.001)
and ‘quality of life’ (MD: 7.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 14.3, p = 0.046).
At one-year follow-up, differences favouring CAS were found for
KOOS ‘sports’ (MD: 11.0, 95% CI 3.0 to 19.0, p = 0.007) and KOOS
‘symptoms’ (MD: 6.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 13.0, p = 0.035). The use of
CAS resulted in fewer outliers in frontal alignment (>
3° malalignment),
both for the entire TKR (37.9% Cite this article:
The outcome of surgery for recurrent lumbar disc
herniation is debatable. Some studies show results that are comparable
with those of primary discectomy, whereas others report worse outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of revision
lumbar discectomy with that of primary discectomy in the same cohort
of patients who had both the primary and the recurrent herniation
at the same level and side. A retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data was undertaken
in 30 patients who had undergone both primary and revision surgery
for late recurrent lumbar disc herniation. The outcome measures
used were visual analogue scales for lower limb (VAL) and back (VAB)
pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). There was a significant improvement in the mean VAL and ODI scores
(both p <
0.001) after primary discectomy. Revision surgery also
resulted in improvements in the mean VAL (p <
0.001), VAB (p
= 0.030) and ODI scores (p <
0.001). The changes were similar
in the two groups (all p >
0.05). Revision discectomy can give results that are as good as those
seen after primary surgery. Cite this article:
The February 2014 Spine Roundup360 looks at: single posterior approach for severe kyphosis; risk factors for recurrent disc herniation; dysphagia and cervical disc replacement or fusion; hang on to your topical antibiotics; cost-effective lumbar disc replacement; anxiolytics no role to play in acute lumbar back pain; and surgery best for lumbar disc herniation.
The February 2014 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup360 looks at: flexible plasters; dual 8-plate or ablation for knee epiphysiodesis; ultrasounds for pulled elbow; leg length without the radiation; Boyd amputation in limb deficiencies; gold standard club foot treatment; quadrupled semitendinosis graft effective in paediatric ACL reconstruction; and predicting complications following cerebral palsy hip reconstruction
To study the measurement properties of a joint specific patient
reported outcome measure, a measure of capability and a general
health-related quality of life (HRQOL) tool in a large cohort of
patients with a hip fracture. Responsiveness and associations between the Oxford Hip Score
(a hip specific measure: OHS), ICEpop CAPability (a measure of capability
in older people: ICECAP-O) and EuroQol EQ-5D (general health-related
quality of life measure: EQ-5D) were assessed using data available
from two large prospective studies. The three outcome measures were assessed
concurrently at a number of fixed follow-up time-points in a consecutive
sequence of patients, allowing direct assessment of change from
baseline, inter-measure associations and validity using a range
of statistical methods.Objectives
Methods
The December 2012 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup360 looks at: whether arthrodistraction is the answer to Perthes’ disease; deformity correction in tarsal coalitions; ultrasound used to predict pain in Osgood-Schlatter’s disease; acetabular tilt; hip replacement for juvenile arthritis sufferers; whether post-operative radiographs are needed for supracondylar fractures; intra-articular local anaesthetic following supracondylar fracture fixation; and limb deformity.