We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes
of two cementless femoral stems in the treatment of patients with
a Garden III or IV fracture of the femoral neck. A total of 70 patients At final follow-up there were no statistically significant differences
between the short anatomical and the conventional stems with regard
to the mean Harris hip score (85.7 (66 to 100) Our study demonstrated that despite the poor bone quality in
these elderly patients with a fracture of the femoral neck, osseo-integration
was obtained in all hips in both groups. However, the incidence
of thigh pain, pulmonary microemboli and peri-prosthetic fracture
was significantly higher in the conventional stem group than in
the short stem group.
We have investigated the accuracy of the templating of digital radiographs in planning total hip replacement using two common object-based calibration methods with the ball placed laterally (method 1) or medially (method 2) and compared them with two non-object-based methods. The latter comprised the application of a fixed magnification of 121% (method 3) and calculation of magnification based on the object-film-distance (method 4). We studied the post-operative radiographs of 57 patients (19 men, 38 women, mean age 73 years (53 to 89)) using the measured diameter of the prosthetic femoral head and comparing it with the true value. Both object-based methods (1 and 2) produced large errors (mean/maximum: 2.55%/17.4% and 2.04%/6.46%, respectively). Method 3 applying a fixed magnification and method 4 (object-film-distance) produced smaller errors (mean/maximum 1.42%/5.22% and 1.57%/4.24%, respectively; p <
0.01). The latter results were clinically relevant and acceptable when planning was allowed to within one implant size. Object-based calibration (methods 1 and 2) has fundamental problems with the correct placement of the calibration ball. The accuracy of the fixed magnification (method 3) matched that of object-film-distance (method 4) and was the most reliable and efficient calibration method in digital templating.
The ability of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)
to differentiate Despite their increasing application in clinical trials, the
origin and role of MSCs in the development, repair and regeneration
of organs have remained unclear. Until recently, MSCs could only
be isolated in a process that requires culture in a laboratory;
these cells were being used for tissue engineering without understanding
their native location and function. MSCs isolated in this indirect
way have been used in clinical trials and remain the reference standard
cellular substrate for musculoskeletal engineering. The therapeutic
use of autologous MSCs is currently limited by the need for In this annotation we provide an update on the recent developments
in the understanding of the identity of MSCs within tissues and
outline how this may affect their use in orthopaedic surgery in
the future. Cite this article:
The December 2013 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Maisonneuve fractures in the long term; Not all gastrocnemius lengthening equal; Those pesky os fibulare; First tarsometatarsal arthrosis; Juvenile osteochondral lesions; Calcanei and infections; Clinical outcomes of Weber B ankle fractures; and rheumatologists have no impact on ankle rheumatoid arthritis.
Tapered, fluted, modular, titanium stems are
increasingly popular in the operative management of Vancouver B2 and
selected B3 peri-prosthetic femoral fractures. We have reviewed
the results at our institution looking at stem survival and clinical
outcomes and compared this with reported outcomes in the literature.
Stem survival at a mean of 54 months was 96% in our series and 97%
for combined published cases. Review of radiology showed maintenance
or improvement of bone stock in 89% of cases with high rates of
femoral union. Favourable clinical outcome scores have reported
by several authors. No difference in survival or clinical scores
was observed between B2 and B3 fractures. Tapered stems are a useful
option in revision for femoral fracture across the spectrum of femoral
bone deficiency. Cite this article:
Total hip replacement (THR) is a very common
procedure undertaken in up to 285 000 Americans each year. Patient
satisfaction with THR is very high, with improvements in general
health, quality of life, and function while at the same time very
cost effective. Although the majority of patients have a high degree
of satisfaction with their THR, 27% experience some discomfort,
and up to 6% experience severe chronic pain. Although it can be
difficult to diagnose the cause of the pain in these patients, this
clinical issue should be approached systematically and thoroughly.
A detailed history and clinical examination can often provide the
correct diagnosis and guide the appropriate selection of investigations, which
will then serve to confirm the clinical diagnosis made. Cite this article:
The February 2014 Trauma Roundup360 looks at: predicting nonunion; compartment Syndrome; octogenarian RTCs; does HIV status affect decision making in open tibial fractures?; flap timing and related complications; proximal humeral fractures under the spotlight; restoration of hip architecture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the elderly; and short
Squeaking arising from a ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC)
total hip replacement (THR) may cause patient concern and in some
cases causes patients to seek revision surgery. We performed a meta-analysis
to determine the incidence of squeaking and the incidence of revision
surgery for squeaking. A total of 43 studies including 16 828 CoC
THR that reported squeaking, or revision for squeaking, were entered
into the analysis. The incidence of squeaking was 4.2% and the incidence
of revision for squeaking was 0.2%. The incidence of squeaking in
patients receiving the Accolade femoral stem was 8.3%, and the incidence
of revision for squeaking in these patients was 1.3%. Cite this article:
We have reviewed 42 patients who had revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing procedures, mostly because of problems with the acetabular component. The revisions were carried out a mean of 26.2 months (1 to 76) after the initial operation and most of the patients (30) were female. Malpositioning of the acetabular component resulted in 27 revisions, mostly because of excessive abduction (mean 69.9°; 56° to 98°) or insufficient or excessive anteversion. Seven patients had more than one reason for revision. The mean increase in the diameter of the component was 1.8 mm (0 to 4) when exchange was needed. Malpositioning of the components was associated with metallosis and a high level of serum ions. The results of revision of the femoral component to a component with a modular head were excellent, but four patients had dislocation after revision and four required a further revision.
We report the results of 62 hips in 62 patients
(17 males, 45 females) with mean age of 62.4 years (37 to 81), who underwent
revision of the acetabular component of a total hip replacement
due to aseptic loosening between May 2003 and November 2007. All
hips had a Paprosky type IIIa acetabular defect. Acetabular revision
was undertaken using a Procotyl E cementless oblong implant with
modular side plates and a hook combined with impaction allografting. At a mean follow-up of 60.5 months (36 to 94) with no patients
lost to follow-up and one died due to unrelated illness, the complication
rate was 38.7%. Complications included aseptic loosening (19 hips),
deep infection (3 hips), broken hook and side plate (one hip) and
a femoral nerve palsy (one hip). Further revision of the acetabular component
was required in 18 hips (29.0%) and a further four hips (6.4%) are
currently loose and awaiting revision. We observed unacceptably high rates of complication and failure
in our group of patients and cannot recommend this implant or technique.
Bone loss in the proximal tibia and distal femur
is frequently encountered in revision knee replacement surgery.
The various options for dealing with this depend on the extent of
any bone loss. We present our results with the use of cementless
metaphyseal metal sleeves in 103 patients (104 knees) with a mean
follow-up of 43 months (30 to 65). At final follow-up, sleeves in
102 knees had good osseointegration. Two tibial sleeves were revised
for loosening, possibly due to infection. The average pre-operative Oxford Knee Score was 23 (11 to 36)
and this improved to 32 (15 to 46) post-operatively. These early
results encourage us to continue with the technique and monitor
the outcomes in the long term. Cite this article:
A modular femoral head–neck junction has practical
advantages in total hip replacement. Taper fretting and corrosion
have so far been an infrequent cause of revision. The role of design
and manufacturing variables continues to be debated. Over the past
decade several changes in technology and clinical practice might
result in an increase in clinically significant taper fretting and
corrosion. Those factors include an increased usage of large diameter
(36 mm) heads, reduced femoral neck and taper dimensions, greater
variability in taper assembly with smaller incision surgery, and
higher taper stresses due to increased patient weight and/or physical
activity. Additional studies are needed to determine the role of
taper assembly compared with design, manufacturing and other implant
variables. Cite this article:
The removal of well-fixed bone cement from the femoral canal during revision of a total hip replacement (THR) can be difficult and risks the loss of excessive bone stock and perforation or fracture of the femoral shaft. Retaining the cement mantle is attractive, yet the technique of cement-in-cement revision is not widely practised. We have used this procedure at our hospital since 1989. The stems were removed to gain a better exposure for acetabular revision, to alter version or leg length, or for component incompatibility. We studied 136 hips in 134 patients and followed them up for a mean of eight years (5 to 15). A further revision was required in 35 hips (25.7%), for acetabular loosening in 26 (19.1%), sepsis in four, instability in three, femoral fracture in one and stem fracture in one. No femoral stem needed to be re-revised for aseptic loosening. A cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem is a reliable technique in the medium term. It also reduces the risk of perforation or fracture of the femoral shaft.
The October 2013 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at: Deltoid impairment not necessarily a contra-indication for shoulder arthroplasty; The tricky radiograph; Not so asymptomatic cuff tears; Total shoulder arthroplasty: kinder on the glenoid; Barbotage for calcific tendonitis; What happens to the arthritic glenoid?; Two screws a screw too few?; Sloppy hinge best for elbow arthroplasty.
We investigated the functional outcome in patients
who underwent reverse shoulder replacement (RSR) after removal of
a tumour of the proximal humerus. A total of 16 patients (ten women
and six men) underwent this procedure between 1998 and 2011 in our
hospital. Five patients died and one was lost to follow-up. Ten
patients were available for review at a mean follow-up of 46 months
(12 to 136). Eight patients had a primary and two patients a secondary
bone tumour. At final follow up the mean range of active movement was: abduction
78° (30° to 150°); flexion 98° (45° to 180°); external rotation
32° (10° to 60°); internal rotation 51° (10° to 80°). The mean Musculoskeletal
Tumor Society score was 77% (60% to 90%) and the mean Toronto Extremity
Salvage Score was 70% (30% to 91%). Two patients had a superficial
infection and one had a deep infection and underwent a two-stage
revision procedure. In two patients there was loosening of the RSR;
one dislocated twice. All patients had some degree of atrophy or
pseudo-atrophy of the deltoid muscle. Use of a RSR in patients with a tumour of the proximal humerus
gives acceptable results. Cite this article:
We have evaluated the clinical effectiveness
of a metal resurfacing inlay implant for osteochondral defects of
the medial talar dome after failed previous surgical treatment.
We prospectively studied 20 consecutive patients with a mean age
of 38 years (20 to 60), for a mean of three years (2 to 5) post-surgery.
There was statistically significant reduction of pain in each of
four situations (i.e., rest, walking, stair climbing and running;
p ≤ 0.01). The median American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society
ankle-hindfoot score improved from 62 (interquartile range (IQR)
46 to 72) pre-operatively to 87 (IQR 75 to 95) at final follow-up
(p <
0.001). The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score improved on all
subscales (p ≤ 0.03). The mean Short-Form 36 physical component
scale improved from 36 (23 to 50) pre-operatively to 45 (29 to 55)
at final follow-up (p = 0.001); the mental component scale did not
change significantly. On radiographs, progressive degenerative changes
of the opposing tibial plafond were observed in two patients. One
patient required additional surgery for the osteochondral defect.
This study shows that a metal implant is a promising treatment for
osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome after failed previous
surgery. Cite this article:
We describe the results at five years of a prospective study of a new tri-tapered polished, cannulated, cemented femoral stem implanted in 51 patients (54 hips) with osteoarthritis. The mean age and body mass index of the patients was 74 years and 27.9, respectively. Using the anterolateral approach, half of the stems were implanted by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon and half by six different registrars. There were three withdrawals from the study because of psychiatric illness, a deep infection and a recurrent dislocation. Five deaths occurred prior to five-year follow-up and one patient withdrew from clinical review. In the remaining 51 hips the mean pre-operative Oxford hip score was 47 points which decreased to 19 points at five years (45 hips). Of the stems 49 (98%) were implanted within 1° of neutral in the femoral canal. The mean migration of the stem at five years was 1.9 mm and the survivorship for aseptic loosening was 100%. There was no significant difference in outcome between the consultant and registrar groups. At five years, the results were comparable with those of other polished, tapered, cemented stems. Long-term surveillance continues.
Modifications in the design of knee replacements have been proposed in order to maximise flexion. We performed a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial to compare the functional outcome, including maximum knee flexion, in patients receiving either a standard or a high flexion version of the NexGen legacy posterior stabilised total knee replacement. A total of 56 patients, half of whom received each design, were assessed pre-operatively and at one year after operation using knee scores and analysis of range of movement using electrogoniometry. For both implant designs there was a significant improvement in the function component of the knee scores (p <
0.001) and the maximum range of flexion when walking on the level, ascending and descending a slope or stairs (all p <
0.001), squatting (p = 0.020) and stepping into a bath (p = 0.024). There was no significant difference in outcome, including the maximum knee flexion, between patients receiving the standard and high flexion designs of this implant.
This study aims to assess the correlation of CT-based structural
rigidity analysis with mechanically determined axial rigidity in
normal and metabolically diseased rat bone. A total of 30 rats were divided equally into normal, ovariectomized,
and partially nephrectomized groups. Cortical and trabecular bone
segments from each animal underwent micro-CT to assess their average
and minimum axial rigidities using structural rigidity analysis.
Following imaging, all specimens were subjected to uniaxial compression
and assessment of mechanically-derived axial rigidity.Objectives
Methods