The aim of this systematic review was to report the rate of dislocation
following the use of dual mobility (DM) acetabular components in
primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). A systematic review of the literature according to the Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines
was performed. A comprehensive search of Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane
Library and Embase (Scopus) was conducted for English articles between
January 1974 and March 2016 using various combinations of the keywords “dual
mobility”, “dual-mobility”, “tripolar”, “double-mobility”, “double
mobility”, “hip”, “cup”, “socket”. The following data were extracted
by two investigators independently: demographics, whether the operation
was a primary or revision THA, length of follow-up, the design of
the components, diameter of the femoral head, and type of fixation
of the acetabular component.Aims
Materials and Methods
There is a large amount of evidence available
about the relative merits of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty
(UKA and TKA). Based on the same evidence, different people draw
different conclusions and as a result, there is great variability
in the usage of UKA. The revision rate of UKA is much higher than TKA and so some
surgeons conclude that UKA should not be performed. Other surgeons
believe that the main reason for the high revision rate is that
UKA is easy to revise and, therefore, the threshold for revision
is low. They also believe that UKA has many advantages over TKA
such as a faster recovery, lower morbidity and mortality and better
function. They therefore conclude that UKA should be undertaken
whenever appropriate. The solution to this argument is to minimise the revision rate
of UKA, thereby addressing the main disadvantage of UKA. The evidence
suggests that this will be achieved if surgeons use UKA for at least
20% of their knee arthroplasties and use implants that are appropriate
for these broad indications. Cite this article:
Little is known about the relative outcomes of revision of unicompartmental
knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) to total
knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to compare the
outcomes of revision surgery for the two procedures in terms of
complications, re-revision and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
at a minimum of two years follow-up. This study was a retrospective review of data from an institutional
arthroplasty registry for cases performed between 2001 and 2014.
A total of 292 patients were identified, of which 217 had a revision
of HTO to TKA, and 75 had revision of UKA to TKA. While mean follow-up
was longer for the HTO group compared with the UKA group, patient
demographics (age, body mass index and Charlson co-morbidity index)
and PROMs (Short Form-36, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score,
both objective and functional) were similar in the two groups prior
to revision surgery. Outcomes included the rate of complications
and
re-operation, PROMS and patient-reported satisfaction at six months
and two years post-operatively. We also compared the duration of
surgery and the need for revision implants in the two groups. Aims
Patients and Methods
The optimal method of tibial component fixation remains uncertain
in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Hydroxyapatite coatings have been
applied to improve bone ingrowth in uncemented designs, but may
only coat the directly accessible surface. As peri-apatite (PA)
is solution deposited, this may increase the coverage of the implant
surface and thereby fixation. We assessed the tibial component fixation
of uncemented PA-coated TKAs Patients were randomised to PA-coated or cemented TKAs. In 60
patients (30 in each group), radiostereometric analysis of tibial
component migration was evaluated as the primary outcome at baseline,
three months post-operatively and at one, two and five years. A
linear mixed-effects model was used to analyse the repeated measurements.Aims
Patients and Methods
This is the second of a series of reviews of registries. This review looks specifically at worldwide registry data that have been collected on knee arthroplasty, what we have learned from their reports, and what the limitations are as to what we currently know.
The lateral compartment is predominantly affected
in approximately 10% of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The
anatomy, kinematics and loading during movement differ considerably
between medial and lateral compartments of the knee. This in the
main explains the relative protection of the lateral compartment
compared with the medial compartment in the development of osteoarthritis.
The aetiology of lateral compartment osteoarthritis can be idiopathic,
usually affecting the femur, or secondary to trauma commonly affecting
the tibia. Surgical management of lateral compartment osteoarthritis
can include osteotomy, unicompartmental knee replacement and total
knee replacement. This review discusses the biomechanics, pathogenesis
and development of lateral compartment osteoarthritis and its management. Cite this article:
Ankle replacements have improved significantly since the first reported attempt at resurfacing of the talar dome in 1962. We are now at a stage where ankle replacement offers a viable option in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. As the procedure becomes more successful, it is important to reflect and review the current surgical outcomes. This allows us to guide our patients in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. What is the better surgical treatment – arthrodesis or replacement?
Up to 40% of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revisions are performed for unexplained pain which may be caused by elevated proximal tibial bone strain. This study investigates the effect of tibial component metal backing and polyethylene thickness on bone strain in a cemented fixed-bearing medial UKA using a finite element model (FEM) validated experimentally by digital image correlation (DIC) and acoustic emission (AE). A total of ten composite tibias implanted with all-polyethylene (AP) and metal-backed (MB) tibial components were loaded to 2500 N. Cortical strain was measured using DIC and cancellous microdamage using AE. FEMs were created and validated and polyethylene thickness varied from 6 mm to 10 mm. The volume of cancellous bone exposed to < -3000 µε (pathological loading) and < -7000 µε (yield point) minimum principal (compressive) microstrain and > 3000 µε and > 7000 µε maximum principal (tensile) microstrain was computed.Objectives
Materials and Methods
The aim of this to study was to compare the previously unreported
long-term survival outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental
knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed by trainee surgeons and consultants. We therefore identified a previously unreported cohort of 1084
knees in 947 patients who had a UKA inserted for anteromedial knee
arthritis by consultants and surgeons in training, at a tertiary
arthroplasty centre and performed survival analysis on the group
with revision as the endpoint.Aims
Patients and Methods
As the number of younger and more active patients
treated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues to increase,
consideration of better fixation as a means of improving implant
longevity is required. Cemented TKA remains the reference standard
with the largest body of evidence and the longest follow-up to support
its use. However, cementless TKA, may offer the opportunity of a
more bone-sparing procedure with long lasting biological fixation
to the bone. We undertook a review of the literature examining advances
of cementless TKA and the reported results. Cite this article:
Bone loss in the proximal tibia and distal femur
is frequently encountered in revision knee replacement surgery.
The various options for dealing with this depend on the extent of
any bone loss. We present our results with the use of cementless
metaphyseal metal sleeves in 103 patients (104 knees) with a mean
follow-up of 43 months (30 to 65). At final follow-up, sleeves in
102 knees had good osseointegration. Two tibial sleeves were revised
for loosening, possibly due to infection. The average pre-operative Oxford Knee Score was 23 (11 to 36)
and this improved to 32 (15 to 46) post-operatively. These early
results encourage us to continue with the technique and monitor
the outcomes in the long term. Cite this article:
The purpose of the present study was to examine the long-term
fixation of a cemented fixed-bearing polished titanium tibial baseplate
(Genesis ll). Patients enrolled in a previous two-year prospective trial (n
= 35) were recalled at ten years. Available patients (n = 15) underwent
radiostereometric analysis (RSA) imaging in a supine position using
a conventional RSA protocol. Migration of the tibial component in
all planes was compared between initial and ten-year follow-up.
Outcome scores including the Knee Society Score, Western Ontario
and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, 12-item Short Form Health
Survey, Forgotten Joint Score, and University of California, Los
Angeles Activity Score were recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
The December 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Albumin and complications in knee arthroplasty; Tantalum: a knee fixation for all seasons?; Dynamic knee alignment; Tibial component design in UKA; Managing the tidal wave of revision knee arthroplasty; Scoring pain in TKR; Does anyone have a ‘normal’ tibial slope?; XLPE in TKR? A five-year clinical study; Spacers and infected revision arthroplasties; Dialysis and arthroplasty
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a cost effective
and extremely successful operation. As longevity increases, the demand
for primary TKA will continue to rise. The success and survivorship
of TKAs are dependent on the demographics of the patient, surgical
technique and implant-related factors. Currently the risk of failure of a TKA requiring revision surgery
ten years post-operatively is 5%. The most common indications for revision include aseptic loosening
(29.8%), infection (14.8%), and pain (9.5%). Revision surgery poses
considerable clinical burdens on patients and financial burdens
on healthcare systems. We present a current concepts review on the epidemiology of failed
TKAs using data from worldwide National Joint Registries. Cite this article:
Partial knee arthroplasty (PKA), either medial
or lateral unicompartmental knee artroplasty (UKA) or patellofemoral arthroplasty
(PFA) are a good option in suitable patients and have the advantages
of reduced operative trauma, preservation of both cruciate ligaments
and bone stock, and restoration of normal kinematics within the
knee joint. However, questions remain concerning long-term survival.
The goal of this review article was to present the long-term results
of medial and lateral UKA, PFA and combined compartmental arthroplasty
for multicompartmental disease. Medium- and long-term studies suggest
reasonable outcomes at ten years with survival greater than 95% in
UKA performed for medial osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis, and similarly
for lateral Cite this article:
The outcome of total knee replacement (TKR) using
components designed to increase the range of flexion is not fully
understood. The short- to mid-term risk of aseptic revision in high
flexion TKR was evaluated. The endpoint of the study was aseptic
revision and the following variables were investigated: implant
design (high flexion In a cohort of 64 000 TKRs, high flexion components were used
in 8035 (12.5%). The high flexion knees with tibial liners of thickness
>
14 mm had a density of revision of 1.45/100 years of observation,
compared with 0.37/100 in non-high flexion TKR with liners ≤ 14
mm thick. Relative to a standard fixed PS TKR, the NexGen (Zimmer,
Warsaw, Indiana) Gender Specific Female high flexion fixed PS TKR
had an increased risk of revision (hazard ratio (HR) 2.27 (95% confidence
interval (CI) 1.48 to 3.50)), an effect that was magnified when
a thicker tibial insert was used (HR 8.10 (95% CI 4.41 to 14.89)). Surgeons should be cautious when choosing high flexion TKRs,
particularly when thicker tibial liners might be required. Cite this article:
The February 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Intra-operative sensors for knee balance; Mobile bearing no advantage; Death and knee replacement: a falling phenomenon; The swings and roundabouts of unicompartmental arthroplasty; Regulation, implants and innovation; The weight of arthroplasty responsibility!; BMI in arthroplasty
Patellofemoral complications are common after
total knee replacement (TKR). Leaving the patellar unsurfaced after
TKR may lead to complications such as anterior knee pain, and re-operation
to surface it. Complications after patellar resurfacing include
patellar fracture, aseptic loosening, patellar instability, polyethylene
wear, patellar clunk and osteonecrosis. Historically, patellar complications
account for one of the larger proportions of causes of failure in
TKR, however, with contemporary implant designs, complication rates
have decreased. Most remaining failures relate to patellofemoral
tracking. Understanding the causes of patellofemoral maltracking
is essential to prevent these complications as well as manage them
when they occur. Cite this article:
The February 2013 Knee Roundup360 looks at: mobile-bearing TKRs; arthroscopic ACL reconstruction; the use of chondrocytes for osteochondral defects; ACL reconstruction and the return to pivoting sports; ACLs and the MOON study; the benefit of knee navigation; and trabecular metal.
