Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 41 - 60 of 300
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 7 | Pages 978 - 979
1 Jul 2006
Dorward N


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 7 | Pages 990 - 996
1 Jul 2016
Fujiwara H Makino T Yonenobu K Honda H Kaito T

Aims

In this prospective observational study, we investigated the time-dependent changes and correlations of upper arm performance tests (ten-second test and Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function (STEF), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in 31 patients with cervical myelopathy who had undergone surgery.

Patients and Methods

We hypothesised that all the indices correlate with each other, but show slightly different recovery patterns, and that the newly described JOACMEQ is a sensitive outcome measure.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 80-B, Issue 3 | Pages 560 - 561
1 May 1998
Ransford A


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 7 | Pages 950 - 955
1 Jul 2014
Guzman JZ Baird EO Fields AC McAnany SJ Qureshi SA Hecht AC Cho SK

C5 nerve root palsy is a rare and potentially debilitating complication of cervical spine surgery. Currently, however, there are no guidelines to help surgeons to prevent or treat this complication.

We carried out a systematic review of the literature to identify the causes of this complication and options for its prevention and treatment. Searches of PubMed, Embase and Medline yielded 60 articles for inclusion, most of which addressed C5 palsy as a complication of surgery. Although many possible causes were given, most authors supported posterior migration of the spinal cord with tethering of the nerve root as being the most likely.

Early detection and prevention of a C5 nerve root palsy using neurophysiological monitoring and variations in surgical technique show promise by allowing surgeons to minimise or prevent the incidence of C5 palsy. Conservative treatment is the current treatment of choice; most patients make a full recovery within two years.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:950–5.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 1 | Pages 170 - 170
1 Jan 1996
Thomas HM


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 69-B, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jan 1987
Evans D


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 55-B, Issue 4 | Pages 889 - 889
1 Nov 1973
Ratliff AHC


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 41-B, Issue 3 | Pages 640 - 641
1 Aug 1959
Law WA


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 38-B, Issue 3 | Pages 734 - 735
1 Aug 1956
Durbin FC


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1646 - 1652
1 Dec 2011
Newton D England M Doll H Gardner BP

The most common injury in rugby resulting in spinal cord injury (SCI) is cervical facet dislocation. We report on the outcome of a series of 57 patients with acute SCI and facet dislocation sustained when playing rugby and treated by reduction between 1988 and 2000 in Conradie Hospital, Cape Town. A total of 32 patients were completely paralysed at the time of reduction. Of these 32, eight were reduced within four hours of injury and five of them made a full recovery. Of the remaining 24 who were reduced after four hours of injury, none made a full recovery and only one made a partial recovery that was useful. Our results suggest that low-velocity trauma causing SCI, such as might occur in a rugby accident, presents an opportunity for secondary prevention of permanent SCI. In these cases the permanent damage appears to result from secondary injury, rather than primary mechanical spinal cord damage. In common with other central nervous system injuries where ischaemia determines the outcome, the time from injury to reduction, and hence reperfusion, is probably important.

In order to prevent permanent neurological damage after rugby injuries, cervical facet dislocations should probably be reduced within four hours of injury.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 6 | Pages 955 - 957
1 Nov 1996
Squires B Gargan MF Bannister GC

Forty patients with a whiplash injury who had been reviewed previously 2 and 10 years after injury were assessed again after a mean of 15.5 years by physical examination, pain and psychometric testing.

Twenty-eight (70%) continued to complain of symptoms referable to the original accident. Neck pain was the commonest, but low-back pain was present in half. Women and older patients had a worse outcome. Radiating pain was more common in those with severe symptoms.

Evidence of psychological disturbance was seen in 52% of patients with symptoms. Between 10 and 15 years after the accident 18% of the patients had improved whereas 28% had deteriorated.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 55-B, Issue 3 | Pages 456 - 457
1 Aug 1973
Patterson FP


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 30-B, Issue 2 | Pages 232 - 233
1 May 1948
Jefferson G


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 30-B, Issue 2 | Pages 234 - 244
1 May 1948
Barnes R

Twenty-two cases of paraplegia complicating injury of the cervical column have been reviewed. The vertebral injury may be due to flexion or hyperextension violence. Flexion injury—There are three types of flexion injury: 1) dislocation; 2) compression fracture of a vertebral body; 3) acute retropulsion of an intervertebral disc. Evidence is presented in support of the view that disc protrusion is the cause of the cord lesion when there is no radiographic evidence of bone injury, and in some cases at least when there is a compression fracture. Treatment is discussed and the indications for caliper traction and laminectomy are presented.

Hyperextension injurv—There are two types of hyperextension injury: 1) dislocation; 2) injury to arthritic spines. Hyperextension injury of an arthritic spine is the usual cause of paraplegia in patients over fifty years of age. The mechanism of hyperextension injury is described. The possible causes of spinal cord injury, and its treatment, are discussed.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 72-B, Issue 3 | Pages 522 - 522
1 May 1990
Grobler G Learmonth I


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 59-B, Issue 1 | Pages 95 - 96
1 Feb 1977
Sheikholeslamzadeh S Aalami-Harandi B Fateh H

Spondylolisthesis of the fourth cervical vertebra is reported in a thirty-four-year-old woman. Only one other case at this level has been found in the literature, but others have been recorded of the sixth cervical vertebra.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 53-B, Issue 3 | Pages 569 - 569
1 Aug 1971
Fairbank TJ


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 50-B, Issue 1 | Pages 52 - 60
1 Feb 1968
Braakman R Vinken PJ

1. In thirty-six out of seventy-two cases of cervical vertebral interlocking, luxation was still present after two weeks ("old luxation"). The principal reasons for overlooking the diagnosis are lack of familiarity with the radiographic appearances and incomplete or inadequate radiographic examination.

2. Failure to identify luxation probably hardly influences the prognosis of the immediate cord lesion; but recovery from the radicular lesion is unfavourably affected, and a progressive cord lesion may occur later when none previously existed.

3. Reduction is advisable if the luxation is not more than six weeks old. Operative reduction is preferred; manual reduction under anaesthesia and caliper traction with heavy weights are less satisfactory alternatives. Reduction is contra-indicated if the luxation is more than six weeks old.

4. Indications for fixation and the choice between internal and external (plaster jacket) fixation are discussed, and also the treatment of stable lesions which have not been reduced.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 45-B, Issue 1 | Pages 36 - 38
1 Feb 1963
Roaf R

1. Evidence is presented that certain types of cervical spine injury are due mainly to lateral flexion forces.

2. These injuries are often complicated by a brachial plexus lesion as well as a lesion of the spinal cord.

3. It is not always easy to detect the brachial plexus injury when the patient is first seen.

4. In the cases reviewed there has been little or no recovery of cord function, and the existence of a brachial plexus injury has, of course, made rehabilitation much more difficult.

5. The practical importance of recognising the mechanism of this type of injury is that treatment which will cause further separation of the vertebrae is inadvisable.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 86-B, Issue 6 | Pages 837 - 840
1 Aug 2004
Fuerderer S Eysel-Gosepath K Schröder U Delank K Eysel P

We describe five patients with cervical spondylosis and large anterior osteophytes causing pharyngeal compression. All had dysphagia, two had obstructive sleep apnoea and another two had dyspnoea and stridor on inspiration. One, with perforation of the pharynx, required emergency tracheostomy. Only three had pain in the neck or arm.

Compression of the retroglottic space was confirmed in all patients by pharyngoscopy and in all the symptoms were relieved by excision of the osteophytes. Three also underwent intervertebral fusion. One had some persistent sleep apnoea.