The aim of this study was to give estimates of the incidence of component incompatibility in hip and knee arthroplasty and to test the effect of an online, real-time compatibility check. Intraoperative barcode registration of arthroplasty implants was introduced in Denmark in 2013. We developed a compatibility database and, from May 2017, real-time compatibility checking was implemented and became part of the registration. We defined four classes of component incompatibility: A-I, A-II, B-I, and B-II, depending on an assessment of the level of risk to the patient (A/B), and on whether incompatibility was knowingly accepted (I/II).Aims
Materials and Methods
Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacement (TKR)
was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of
polyethylene inserts. However, no consistent clinical advantages
of mobile- over fixed-bearing (FB) TKR have been found. In this
study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over
fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome
scores. Furthermore, we determined which modifying variables affected
the outcome. A systematic search of the literature was conducted to collect
clinical trials comparing MB and FB in primary TKR. The primary
outcomes were revision rates for any reason, aseptic loosening and
wear. Secondary outcomes included range of movement, Knee Society
score (KSS), Oxford knee score (OKS), Short-Form 12 (SF-12) score
and radiological parameters. Meta-regression techniques were used
to explore factors modifying the observed effect. Our search yielded 1827 publications, of which 41 studies met
our inclusion criteria, comprising over 6000 TKRs. Meta-analyses
showed no clinically relevant differences in terms of revision rates,
clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between
MB and FB TKRs. It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority
of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term inducible
displacement of cemented tibial components ten years after total
knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 15 patients from a previously reported prospective
trial of fixation using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) were examined
at a mean of 11 years (10 to 11) postoperatively. Longitudinal supine
RSA examinations were acquired at one week, one year, and two years
postoperatively and at final follow-up. Weight-bearing RSA examinations
were also undertaken with the operated lower limb in neutral and
in maximum internal rotation positions. Maximum total point motion
(MTPM) was calculated for the longitudinal and inducible displacement examinations
(supine Aims
Patients and Methods
As the number of younger and more active patients
treated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues to increase,
consideration of better fixation as a means of improving implant
longevity is required. Cemented TKA remains the reference standard
with the largest body of evidence and the longest follow-up to support
its use. However, cementless TKA, may offer the opportunity of a
more bone-sparing procedure with long lasting biological fixation
to the bone. We undertook a review of the literature examining advances
of cementless TKA and the reported results. Cite this article:
This prospective randomised controlled double-blind
trial compared two types of PFC Sigma total knee replacement (TKR),
differing in three design features aimed at improving flexion. The
outcome of a standard fixed-bearing posterior cruciate ligament-preserving
design (FB-S) was compared with that of a high-flexion rotating-platform
posterior-stabilised design (RP-F) at one year after TKR. The study group of 77 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
comprised 37 men and 40 women, with a mean age of 69 years (44.9
to 84.9). The patients were randomly allocated either to the FB-S
or the RP-F group and assessed pre-operatively and at one year post-operatively.
The mean post-operative non-weight-bearing flexion was 107° (95%
confidence interval (CI) 104° to 110°)) for the FB-S group and 113°
(95% CI 109° to 117°) for the RP-F group, and this difference was
statistically significant (p = 0.032). However, weight-bearing range
of movement during both level walking and ascending a slope as measured
during flexible electrogoniometry was a mean of 4° lower in the RP-F
group than in the FB-S group, with 58° (95% CI 56° to 60°) Although the RP-F group achieved higher non-weight-bearing knee
flexion, patients in this group did not use this during activities
of daily living and reported more pain one year after surgery
Our aim was to examine the clinical and radiographic outcomes
in 257 consecutive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (OUKAs)
(238 patients), five years post-operatively. A retrospective evaluation was undertaken of patients treated
between April 2008 and October 2010 in a regional centre by two
non-designing surgeons with no previous experience of UKAs. The
Oxford Knee Scores (OKSs) were recorded and fluoroscopically aligned
radiographs were assessed post-operatively at one and five years.Aims
Patients and Methods
Malrotation of the femoral component can result in post-operative complications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including patellar maltracking. Therefore, we used computational simulation to investigate the influence of femoral malrotation on contact stresses on the polyethylene (PE) insert and on the patellar button as well as on the forces on the collateral ligaments. Validated finite element (FE) models, for internal and external malrotations from 0° to 10° with regard to the neutral position, were developed to evaluate the effect of malrotation on the femoral component in TKA. Femoral malrotation in TKA on the knee joint was simulated in walking stance-phase gait and squat loading conditions.Objectives
Materials and Methods
There has been a recent increase in interest
for non-cemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however
the superiority of cement fixation is an ongoing debate. Whereas the results based on Level III and IV evidence show similar
survivorship rates between the two types of fixation, Level I and
II evidence strongly support cemented fixation. United Kingdom,
Australia, Sweden, and New Zealand registry data show lower failure
rates and greater usage of cemented than non-cemented fixation.
Case series studies have also indicated greater functional outcomes
and lower revision rates among cemented TKAs. Non-cemented fixation
involves more patellofemoral complications, including increased
susceptibility to wear due to a thinner polyethylene bearing on
the cementless metal-backed component. The combination of results
from registry data, prospective randomised studies, and meta-analyses
support the current superiority of cemented fixation in TKAs.
We have studied the concept of posterior condylar offset and the importance of its restoration on the maximum range of knee flexion after posterior-cruciate-ligament-retaining total knee replacement (TKR). We measured the difference in the posterior condylar offset before and one year after operation in 69 patients who had undergone a primary cruciate-sacrificing mobile bearing TKR by one surgeon using the same implant and a standardised operating technique. In all the patients true pre- and post-operative lateral radiographs had been taken. The mean pre- and post-operative posterior condylar offset was 25.9 mm (21 to 35) and 26.9 mm (21 to 34), respectively. The mean difference in posterior condylar offset was + 1 mm (−6 to +5). The mean pre-operative knee flexion was 111° (62° to 146°) and at one year postoperatively, it was 107° (51° to 137°). There was no statistical correlation between the change in knee flexion and the difference in the posterior condylar offset after TKR (Pearson correlation coefficient r = −0.06, p = 0.69).
The February 2013 Knee Roundup360 looks at: mobile-bearing TKRs; arthroscopic ACL reconstruction; the use of chondrocytes for osteochondral defects; ACL reconstruction and the return to pivoting sports; ACLs and the MOON study; the benefit of knee navigation; and trabecular metal.
We evaluated the rates of survival and cause
of revision of seven different brands of cemented primary total
knee replacement (TKR) in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register during
the years 1994 to 2009. Revision for any cause, including resurfacing
of the patella, was the primary endpoint. Specific causes of revision
were secondary outcomes. Three posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) fixed modular-bearing
TKRs, two fixed non-modular bearing PCR TKRs and two mobile-bearing
posterior cruciate-sacrificing TKRs were investigated in a total
of 17 782 primary TKRs. The median follow-up for the implants ranged
from 1.8 to 6.9 years. Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival ranged from
89.5% to 95.3%. Cox’s relative risk (RR) was calculated relative
to the fixed modular-bearing Profix knee (the most frequently used
TKR in Norway), and ranged from 1.1 to 2.6. The risk of revision
for aseptic tibial loosening was higher in the mobile-bearing LCS
Classic (RR 6.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8 to 12.1)), the
LCS Complete (RR 7.7 (95% CI 4.1 to 14.4)), the fixed modular-bearing
Duracon (RR 4.5 (95% CI 1.8 to 11.1)) and the fixed non-modular
bearing AGC Universal TKR (RR 2.5 (95% CI 1.3 to 5.1)), compared
with the Profix. These implants (except AGC Universal) also had
an increased risk of revision for femoral loosening (RR 2.3
(95% CI 1.1 to 4.8), RR 3.7 (95% CI 1.6 to 8.9), and RR 3.4 (95%
CI 1.1 to 11.0), respectively). These results suggest that aseptic
loosening is related to design in TKR. Cite this article:
Patellofemoral complications are common after
total knee replacement (TKR). Leaving the patellar unsurfaced after
TKR may lead to complications such as anterior knee pain, and re-operation
to surface it. Complications after patellar resurfacing include
patellar fracture, aseptic loosening, patellar instability, polyethylene
wear, patellar clunk and osteonecrosis. Historically, patellar complications
account for one of the larger proportions of causes of failure in
TKR, however, with contemporary implant designs, complication rates
have decreased. Most remaining failures relate to patellofemoral
tracking. Understanding the causes of patellofemoral maltracking
is essential to prevent these complications as well as manage them
when they occur. Cite this article:
We retrospectively reviewed 35 cemented unicompartmental knee replacements performed for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee in 31 patients ≤50 years old (mean 46, 31 to 49). Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically using the Knee Society scores at a mean follow-up of 9.7 years (5 to 16) and survival at 12 years was calculated. The mean Knee Society Function Score improved from 54 points (25 to 64) pre-operatively to 89 (80 to 100) post-operatively (p <
0.0001). Six knees required revision, four for polyethylene wear treated with an isolated exchange of the tibial insert, one for aseptic loosening and one for progression of osteoarthritis. The 12-year survival according to Kaplan-Meier was 80.6% with revision for any reason as the endpoint. Despite encouraging clinical results, polyethylene wear remains a major concern affecting the survival of unicompartmental knee replacement in patients younger than 50.
Achieving deep flexion after total knee replacement remains a challenge. In this study we compared the soft-tissue tension and tibiofemoral force in a mobile-bearing posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing total knee replacement, using equal flexion and extension gaps, and with the gaps increased by 2 mm each. The tests were conducted during passive movement in five cadaver knees, and measurements of strain were made simultaneously in the collateral ligaments. The tibiofemoral force was measured using a customised mini-force plate in the tibial tray. Measurements of collateral ligament strain were not very sensitive to changes in the gap ratio, but tibiofemoral force measurements were. Tibiofemoral force was decreased by a mean of 40% (
We conducted a randomised prospective study to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement of similar design in 174 patients who had bilateral simultaneous knee replacement. The mean follow-up was for 5.6 years (5.2 to 6.1). The total knee score, pain score, functional score and range of movement were not statistically different (p >
0.05) between the two groups. Osteolysis was not seen in any knee in either group. Two knees (1%) in the mobile-bearing group required revision because of infection; none in the fixed-bearing group needed revision. Excellent results can be achieved with both mobile- and fixed-bearing prostheses of similar design at mid-term follow-up. We could demonstrate no significant clinical advantage for a mobile bearing.
The purpose of this study was to undertake a
meta-analysis to determine whether there is lower polyethylene wear and
longer survival when using mobile-bearing implants in total knee
replacement when compared with fixed-bearing implants. Of 975 papers
identified, 34 trials were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis
comprising 4754 patients (6861 knees). We found no statistically
significant differences between the two designs in terms of the incidence
of radiolucent lines, osteolysis, aseptic loosening or survival.
There is thus currently no evidence to suggest that the use of mobile-bearing
designs reduce polyethylene wear and prolong survival after total
knee replacement. Cite this article:
Between April 2004 and July 2007, we performed 241 primary total knee replacements in 204 patients using the e.motion posterior cruciate-retaining, multidirectional mobile-bearing prosthesis. Of these, 100 were carried out using an image-free navigation system, and the remaining 141 with the conventional technique. We conducted a retrospective study from the prospectively collected data of these patients to assess the early results of this new mobile-bearing design. At a mean follow-up of 49 months (32 to 71), 18 knees (7.5%) had mechanical complications of which 13 required revision. Three of these had a peri-prosthetic fracture, and were removed from the study. The indication for revision in the remaining ten was loosening of the femoral component in two, tibiofemoral dislocation in three, disassociation of the polyethylene liner in four, and a broken polyethyene liner in one. There were eight further mechanically unstable knees which presented with recurrent disassociation of the polyethylene liner. There was no significant difference in the incidence of mechanical instability between the navigation-assisted procedures (8 of 99, 8.1%) and the conventionally implanted knees (10 of 139, 7.2%). In our view, the relatively high rate of mechanical complications and revision within 30 months precludes the further use of new design of knee replacement.
