The April 2014 Hip & Pelvis Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Recent arthroplasty and flight; whether that squeak could be a fracture; diagnosing early infected hip replacement; impaction grafting at a decade; whether squeaking is more common than previously thought; femoral offset associated with post THR outcomes; and periprosthetic fracture stabilisation.

Unstable bicondylar tibial plateau fractures are rare and there is little guidance in the literature as to the best form of treatment. We examined the short- to medium-term outcome of this injury in a consecutive series of patients presenting to two trauma centres. Between December 2005 and May 2010, a total of 55 fractures in 54 patients were treated by fixation, 34 with peri-articular locking plates and 21 with limited access direct internal fixation in combination with circular external fixation using a Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF). At a minimum of one year post-operatively, patient-reported outcome measures including the WOMAC index and SF-36 scores showed functional deficits, although there was no significant difference between the two forms of treatment. Despite low outcome scores, patients were generally satisfied with the outcome. We achieved good clinical and radiological outcomes, with low rates of complication. In total, only three patients (5%) had collapse of the joint of > 4 mm, and metaphysis to diaphysis angulation of greater than 5º, and five patients (9%) with displacement of > 4 mm. All patients in our study went on to achieve full union.

This study highlights the serious nature of this injury and generally poor patient-reported outcome measures following surgery, despite treatment by experienced surgeons using modern surgical techniques. Our findings suggest that treatment of complex bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with either a locking plate or a TSF gives similar clinical and radiological outcomes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:956–62.

Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures result from high-energy injuries. Fractures of the tibial plateau can involve the tibial tubercle, which represents a disruption to the extensor mechanism and logically must be stabilised. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of an independent tibial tubercle fracture in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures, and to report management strategies and potential complications. We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected orthopaedic trauma database for the period January 2003 to December 2008, and identified 392 bicondylar fractures of the tibial plateau, in which 85 tibial tubercle fractures (21.6%) were identified in 84 patients. There were 60 men and 24 women in our study group, with a mean age of 45.4 years (18 to 71). In 84 fractures open reduction and internal fixation was undertaken, either with screws alone (23 patients) or with a plate and screws (61 patients). The remaining patient was treated non-operatively. In all, 52 fractures were available for clinical and radiological assessment at a mean follow-up of 58.5 weeks (24 to 94). All fractures of the tibial tubercle united, but 24 of 54 fractures (46%) required a secondary procedure for their tibial plateau fracture. Four patients reported pain arising from prominent tubercle plates and screws, which in one patient required removal. Tibial tubercle fractures occurred in over one-fifth of the bicondylar tibial plateau fractures in our series. Fixation is necessary and can be reliably performed with screws alone or with a screw and plate, which restores the extensor mechanism and facilitates early knee flexion.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1697–1702.