Studying the indications for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) may enable surgeons to change their practice during the initial procedure, thereby reducing the need for revision surgery. The aim of this study was to identify and describe the potentially avoidable indications for revision THA within five years of the initial procedure. A retrospective review of 117 patients (73 women, 44 men; mean age 61.5 years (27 to 88)) who met the inclusion criteria was conducted. Three adult reconstruction surgeons independently reviewed the radiographs and medical records, and they classified the revision THAs into two categories: potentially avoidable and unavoidable. Baseline demographics, perioperative details, and quality outcomes up to the last follow-up were recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
We evaluated the short-term functional outcome and prevalence
of bearing-specific generation of audible noise in 301 patients
(336 hips) operated on with fourth generation (Delta) medium diameter
head, ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasties (THAs). There were 191 female (63%) and 110 male patients (37%) with
a mean age of 61 years (29 to 78) and mean follow-up of 2.1 years
(1.3 to 3.4). Patients completed three questionnaires: Oxford Hip
Score (OHS), Research and Development 36-item health survey (RAND-36)
and a noise-specific symptom questionnaire. Plain radiographs were also
analysed. A total of three hips (0.9%) were revised. Aims
Patients and Methods
It is important to consider sagittal pelvic rotation when introducing
the acetabular component at total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose
of this study was to identify patients who are at risk of unfavourable
pelvic mobility, which could result in poor outcomes after THA. A consecutive series of 4042 patients undergoing THA had lateral
functional radiographs and a low-dose CT scan to measure supine
pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, standing pelvic tilt, flexed-seated
pelvic tilt, standing lumbar lordotic angle, flexed-seated lumbar
lordotic angle, and lumbar flexion. Changes in pelvic tilt from
supine-to-standing positions and supine-to-flexed-seated positions
were determined. A change in pelvic tilt of 13° between positions was
deemed unfavourable as it alters functional anteversion by 10° and
effectively places the acetabular component outside the safe zone
of orientation.Aims
Patients and Methods
The leading indication for revision total hip
arthroplasty (THA) remains aseptic loosening owing to wear. The younger,
more active patients currently undergoing THA present unprecedented
demands on the bearings. Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings have
consistently shown the lowest rates of wear. The recent advances,
especially involving alumina/zirconia composite ceramic, have led
to substantial improvements and good results Alumina/zirconia composite ceramics are extremely hard, scratch
resistant and biocompatible. They offer a low co-efficient of friction
and superior lubrication and lower rates of wear compared with other
bearings. The major disadvantage is the risk of fracture of the
ceramic. The new composite ceramic has reduced the risk of fracture
of the femoral head to 0.002%. The risk of fracture of the liner
is slightly higher (0.02%). Assuming that the components are introduced without impingement,
CoC bearings have major advantages over other bearings. Owing to
the superior hardness, they produce less third body wear and are
less vulnerable to intra-operative damage. The improved tribology means that CoC bearings are an excellent
choice for young, active patients requiring THA. Cite this article:
For this retrospective cohort study, patients aged ≤ 30 years
(very young) who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) were compared
with patients aged ≥ 60 years (elderly) to evaluate the rate of
revision arthroplasty, implant survival, the indications for revision,
the complications, and the patient-reported outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary
THA between January 2000 and May 2015 from our institutional database.
A total of 145 very young and 1359 elderly patients were reviewed.
The mean follow-up was 5.3 years (1 to 18). Logistic generalized
estimating equations were used to compare characteristics and the revision
rate. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier curves and hazard
rates were created using Cox regression.Aims
Patients and Methods
The June 2014 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Modular femoral necks: early signs are not good; is corrosion to blame for modular neck failures; metal-on-metal is not quite a closed book; no excess failures in fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures; noise no problem in hip replacement; heterotopic ossification after hip arthroscopy: are NSAIDs the answer?; thrombotic and bleeding events surprisingly low in total joint replacement; and the elephant in the room: complications and surgical volume.
We analysed 54 alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings
from total hip replacements retrieved at one centre after a mean
duration of 3.5 years (0.2 to 10.6)
We reviewed the literature on the currently available
choices of bearing surface in total hip replacement (THR). We present
a detailed description of the properties of articulating surfaces
review the understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of
existing bearing couples. Recent technological developments in the
field of polyethylene and ceramics have altered the risk of fracture
and the rate of wear, although the use of metal-on-metal bearings has
largely fallen out of favour, owing to concerns about reactions
to metal debris. As expected, all bearing surface combinations have
advantages and disadvantages. A patient-based approach is recommended,
balancing the risks of different options against an individual’s
functional demands. Cite this article:
Large femoral heads have become popular in total
hip replacement (THR) as a method of reducing the risk of dislocation.
However, if large heads are used in ceramic-on-ceramic THR, the
liner must be thinner, which may increase the risk of fracture.
To compare the rates of ceramic fracture and dislocation between
28 mm and 32 mm ceramic heads, 120 hips in 109 patients (51 men
and 58 women, mean age 49.2 years) were randomised to THR with either
a 28 mm or a 32 mm ceramic articulation. A total of 57/60 hips assigned
to the 28 mm group and 55/60 hips assigned to the 32 mm group were
followed for at least five years. No ceramic component fractures
occured in any patient in either group. There was one dislocation
in the 32 mm group and none in the 28 mm group (p = 0.464). No hip
had detectable wear, focal osteolysis or prosthetic loosening. In
our small study the 32 mm ceramic articulation appeared to be safe
in terms of ceramic liner fracture. Cite this article:
This systematic review of the literature summarises
the clinical experience with ceramic-on-ceramic hip bearings over
the past 40 years and discusses the concerns that exist in relation
to the bearing combination. Loosening, fracture, liner chipping
on insertion, liner canting and dissociation, edge-loading and squeaking
have all been reported, and the relationship between these issues
and implant design and surgical technique is investigated. New design
concepts are introduced and analysed with respect to previous clinical
experience.
The primary aim of this independent prospective randomised trial
was to compare serum metal ion levels for ceramic-on-metal (CoM)
and metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty
(THA). Our one-year results demonstrated elevation in metal ion
levels above baseline with no significant difference between the
CoM and MoM groups. This paper reviews the five-year data. The implants used in each patient differed only in respect to
the type of femoral head (ceramic or metal). At five-year follow-up
of the 83 enrolled patients, data from 67 (36 CoM, 31 MoM) was available
for comparison.Aims
Patients and Methods
Our study aimed to examine not only the incidence but also the
impact of noise from two types of total hip replacement articulations:
ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene. We performed a case-controlled study comparing subjective and
objective questionnaire scores of patients receiving a ceramic-on-ceramic
or a ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip replacement by a single surgeon.Objectives
Methods
We report the clinical and radiological outcomes
of a series of contemporary cementless ceramic-on-ceramic total hip
replacements (THRs) at ten years in patients aged ≤ 55 years of
age. Pre- and post-operative activity levels are described. A total
of 120 consecutive ceramic cementless THRs were performed at a single
centre in 110 patients from 1997 to 1999. The mean age of the patients
at operation was 45 years (20 to 55). At ten years, four patients
had died and six were lost to follow-up, comprising ten hips. The
mean post-operative Harris hip score was 94.7 (55 to 100). Radiological
analysis was undertaken in 90 available THRs of the surviving 106
hips at final review: all had evidence of stable bony ingrowth,
with no cases of osteolysis. Wear was undetectable. There were four
revisions. The survival for both components with revision for any
cause as an endpoint was 96.5% (95% confidence interval 94.5 to
98.7). The mean modified University of California, Los Angeles activity
level rose from a mean of 6.4 (4 to 10) pre-operatively to 9.0 (6
to 10) at the ten-year post-operative period. Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in cementless primary THR
in this series have resulted in good clinical and radiological outcomes
with undetectable rates of wear and excellent function in the demanding
younger patient group at ten years. Cite this article:
A number of studies have reported satisfactory
results from the isolated revision of an acetabular component. However,
many of these studies reported only the short- to intermediate-term
results of heterogeneous bearing surfaces in a mixed age group. We present our experience of using a ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC)
bearing for isolated revision of an uncemented acetabular component
in 166 patients (187 hips) who were under the age of 50 years at
the time of revision. There were 78 men and 88 women with a mean
age of 47.4 years (28 to 49). The most common reason for revision
was polyethylene wear and acetabular osteolysis in 123 hips (66%),
followed by aseptic loosening in 49 hips (26%). We report the clinical and radiological outcome, complication
rate, and survivorship of this group. The mean duration of follow-up
was 15.6 years (11 to 19). The mean pre-operative Harris hip score was 33 points (1 to 58),
and improved to a mean of 88 points (51 to 100) at follow-up. The
mean pre-operative total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
Osteoarthritis Index score was 63.2 (43 to 91) and improved to 19.8
points (9 to 61) post-operatively. Overall, 153 of 166 patients
(92%) were satisfied with their outcome. Kaplan–Meier survivorship
analysis, with revision or radiological evidence of implant failure
(13 patients, 8%) as end-points, was 92% at 15 years (95% confidence
interval 0.89 to 0.97). Isolated revision of a cementless acetabular component using
a CoC bearing gives good results in patients under 50 years of age. Cite this article:
The February 2013 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: amazing alumina; dual mobility; white cells and periprosthetic infection; cartilage and impingement surgery; acetabulum in combination; cementless ceramic prosthesis; metal-on-metal hips; and whether size matters in failure.
To determine ten-year failure rates following 36 mm metal-on-metal
(MoM) Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty (THA), and identify predictors
of failure. We retrospectively assessed a single-centre cohort of 569 primary
36 mm MoM Pinnacle THAs (all Corail stems) followed up since 2012
according to Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency
recommendations. All-cause failure rates (all-cause revision, and
non-revised cross-sectional imaging failures) were calculated, with predictors
for failure identified using multivariable Cox regression.Aims
Patients and Methods
To determine the effect of a change in design of a cementless
ceramic acetabular component in fixation and clinical outcome after
total hip arthroplasty We compared 342 hips (302 patients) operated between 1999 and
2005 with a relatively smooth hydroxyapatite coated acetabular component
(group 1), and 337 hips (310 patients) operated between 2006 and
2011 using a similar acetabular component with a macrotexture on
the entire outer surface of the component (group 2). The mean age of
the patients was 53.5 (14 to 70) in group 1 and 53.0 (15 to 70)
in group 2. The mean follow-up was 12.7 years (10 to 17) for group
1 and 7.2 years (4 to 10) for group 2.Aims
Patients and Methods
We performed a systematic review of the current literature regarding
the outcomes of unconstrained metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) arthroplasty. We initially identified 1305 studies, and 406 were found to be
duplicates. After exclusion criteria were applied, seven studies
were included. Outcomes extracted included pre- and post-operative
pain visual analogue scores, range of movement (ROM), strength of
pinch and grip, satisfaction and patient reported outcome measures
(PROMs). Clinical and radiological complications were recorded.
The results are presented in three groups based on the design of
the arthroplasty and the aetiology (pyrocarbon-osteoarthritis (pyro-OA),
pyrocarbon-inflammatory arthritis (pyro-IA), metal-on-polyethylene
(MoP)).Aims
Materials and Methods
