Instability is a common indication for early
revision after both primary and revision total knee arthroplasty
(TKA), accounting for up to 20% in the literature. The number of
TKAs performed annually continues to climb exponentially, thus having
an effective algorithm for treatment is essential. This relies on
a thorough pre- and intra-operative assessment of the patient. The
underlying cause of the instability must be identified initially
and subsequently, the surgeon must be able to balance the flexion
and extension gaps and be comfortable using a variety of constrained
implants. This review describes the assessment of the unstable TKA, and
the authors’ preferred form of treatment for these difficult cases
where the source of instability is often multifactorial. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical
outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after manipulation under
anaesthesia (MUA) for post-operative stiffness with a matched cohort
of TKA patients who did not requre MUA. In total 72 patients (mean age 59.8 years, 42 to 83) who underwent
MUA following TKA were identified from our prospective database
and compared with a matched cohort of patients who had undergone
TKA without subsequent MUA. Patients were evaluated for range of
movement (ROM) and clinical outcome scores (Western Ontario and
McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Short-Form Health Survey,
and Knee Society Clinical Rating System) at a mean follow-up of
36.4 months (12 to 120). MUA took place at a mean of nine weeks
(5 to 18) after TKA. In patients who required MUA, mean flexion
deformity improved from 10° (0° to 25°) to 4.4° (0° to 15°) (p <
0.001),
and mean range of flexion improved from 79.8° (65° to 95°) to 116°
(80° to 130°) (p <
0.001). There were no statistically significant
differences in ROM or functional outcome scores at three months,
one year, or two years between those who required MUA and those
who did not. There were no complications associated with manipulation At most recent follow-up, patients requiring MUA achieved equivalent
ROM and clinical outcome scores when compared with a matched control
group. While other studies have focused on ROM after manipulation,
the current study adds to current literature by supplementing this
with functional outcome scores. Cite this article:
Although the vast majority of patients that undergo
total knee replacement have satisfactory outcomes with a generally
low complication rate, occasionally a patient will be encountered
that has had multiple failed surgeries, and now reaches a crossroad
as to whether limb salvage will be acceptable or not. Cite this article:
The use of hinged implants in primary total knee
replacement (TKR) should be restricted to selected indications and mainly
for elderly patients. Potential indications for a rotating hinge
or pure hinge implant in primary TKR include: collateral ligament
insufficiency, severe varus or valgus deformity (>
20°) with necessary
relevant soft-tissue release, relevant bone loss including insertions
of collateral ligaments, gross flexion-extension gap imbalance,
ankylosis, or hyperlaxity. Although data reported in the literature
are inconsistent, clinical results depend on implant design, proper
technical use, and adequate indications. We present our experience
with a specific implant type that we have used for over 30 years
and which has given our elderly patients good mid-term results.
Because revision of implants with long cemented stems can be very
challenging, an effort should be made in the future to use shorter stems
in modular versions of hinged implants. Cite this article:
Total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the most
common operations in orthopaedic surgery worldwide. Despite its
scientific reputation as mainly successful, only 81% to 89% of patients
are satisfied with the final result. Our understanding of this discordance
between patient and surgeon satisfaction is limited. In our experience,
focus on five major factors can improve patient satisfaction rates:
correct patient selection, setting of appropriate expectations,
avoiding preventable complications, knowledge of the finer points
of the operation, and the use of both pre- and post-operative pathways.
Awareness of the existence, as well as the identification of predictors
of patient–surgeon discordance should potentially help with enhancing
patient outcomes. Cite this article:
Evaluation of patients with painful total knee replacement requires a thorough clinical examination and relevant investigations in order to reach a diagnosis. Awareness of the common and uncommon problems leading to painful total knee replacement is useful in the diagnostic approach. This review article aims to act as a guide to the evaluation of patients with painful total knee replacement.
We analysed at a mean follow-up of 7.25 years the clinical and radiological outcome of 117 patients (125 knees) who had undergone a primary, cemented, modular Freeman-Samuelson total knee replacement. While the tibial and femoral components were cemented, the patellar component was uncemented. A surface-cementing technique was used to secure the tibial components. A total of 82 knees was available for radiological assessment. Radiolucent lines were seen in 41 knees (50%) and osteolytic lesions were seen in 13 knees (16%). Asymptomatic, rotational loosening of the patellar implant was seen in four patients and osteolysis was more common in patients with a patellar resurfacing. Functional outcome scores were available for 41 patients (41 knees, 35%) and the mean Western Ontario McMasters Universities score was 77.5 (
