The effective capture of outcome measures in
the healthcare setting can be traced back to Florence Nightingale’s
investigation of the in-patient mortality of soldiers wounded in
the Crimean war in the 1850s. Only relatively recently has the formalised collection of outcomes
data into Registries been recognised as valuable in itself. With the advent of surgeon league tables and a move towards value
based health care, individuals are being driven to collect, store
and interpret data. Following the success of the National Joint Registry, the British
Association of Spine Surgeons instituted the British Spine Registry.
Since its launch in 2012, over 650 users representing the whole
surgical team have registered and during this time, more than 27 000
patients have been entered onto the database. There has been significant publicity regarding the collection
of outcome measures after surgery, including patient-reported scores.
Over 12 000 forms have been directly entered by patients themselves,
with many more entered by the surgical teams. Questions abound: who should have access to the data produced
by the Registry and how should they use it? How should the results
be reported and in what forum? Cite this article:
Following the introduction of national standards in 2009, most
major paediatric trauma is now triaged to specialist units offering
combined orthopaedic and plastic surgical expertise. We investigated
the management of open tibia fractures at a paediatric trauma centre,
primarily reporting the risk of infection and rate of union. A retrospective review was performed on 61 children who between
2007 and 2015 presented with an open tibia fracture. Their mean
age was nine years (2 to 16) and the median follow-up was ten months
(interquartile range 5 to 18). Management involved IV antibiotics,
early debridement and combined treatment of the skeletal and soft-tissue injuries
in line with standards proposed by the British Orthopaedic Association.Aims
Patients and Methods
While use of large national clinical databases for orthopaedic
trauma research has increased dramatically, there has been little
study of the differences in populations contained therein. In this
study we aimed to compare populations of patients with femoral shaft
fractures across three commonly used national databases, specifically
with regard to age and comorbidities. Patients were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS),
National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and National
Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Aims
Patients and Methods
In this study, we aimed to determine whether designation as a
major trauma centre (MTC) affects the quality of care for patients
with a fracture of the hip. All patients in the United Kingdom National Hip Fracture Database,
between April 2010 and December 2013, were included. The indicators
of quality that were recorded included the time to arrival on an
orthopaedic ward, to review by a geriatrician, and to operation.
The clinical outcomes were the development of a pressure sore, discharge
home, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and re-operation within
30 days. Aims
Patients and Methods
The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) was
developed to assess the risk of death following a fracture of the
hip, based on pre-operative patient characteristics. We performed
an independent validation of the NHFS, assessed the degree of geographical
variation that exists between different units within the United
Kingdom and attempted to define a NHFS level that is associated
with high risk of mortality. The NHFS was calculated retrospectively for consecutive patients
presenting with a fracture of the hip to two hospitals in England.
The observed 30-day mortality for each NHFS cohort was compared
with that predicted by the NHFS using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test.
The distribution of NHFS in the observed group was compared with
data from other hospitals in the United Kingdom. The proportion
of patients identified as high risk and the mortality within the
high risk group were assessed for groups defined using different
thresholds for the NHFS. In all 1079 hip fractures were included in the analysis, with
a mean age of 83 years (60 to 105), 284 (26%) male. Overall 30-day
mortality was 7.3%. The NHFS was a significant predictor of 30-day
mortality. Statistically significant differences in the distribution
of the NHFS were present between different units in England (p <
0.001). A NHFS ≥ 6 appears to be an appropriate cut-point to identify
patients at high risk of mortality following a fracture of the hip. Cite this article:
Rates of mortality as high as 25% to 30% have been described
following fractures of the odontoid in the elderly population. The
aim of this study was to examine whether easily identifiable variables
present on admission are associated with mortality. A consecutive series of 83 elderly patients with a fracture of
the odontoid following a low-impact injury was identified retrospectively.
Data that were collected included demographics, past medical history
and the results of blood tests on admission. Radiological investigations
were used to assess the Anderson and D’Alonzo classification and
displacement of the fracture. The mean age was 82.9 years (65 to
101). Most patients (66; 79.5%) had a type 2 fracture. An associated
neurological deficit was present in 11 (13.3%). All were treated
conservatively; 80 (96.4%) with a hard collar and three (3.6%) with
halo vest immobilisation.Aims
Patients and Methods
Many hospitals do not have a structured process
of consent, the attainment of which can often be rather ‘last-minute’
and somewhat chaotic. This is a surprising state of affairs as spinal
surgery is a high-risk surgical specialty with potential for expensive
litigation claims. More recently, the Montgomery ruling by the United
Kingdom Supreme Court has placed the subject of informed consent
into the spotlight. There is a paucity of practical guidance on how a consent process
can be achieved in a busy clinical setting. The British Association
of Spinal Surgeons (BASS) has convened a working party to address
this need. To our knowledge this is the first example of a national
professional body, representing a single surgical specialty, taking such
a fundamental initiative. In a hard-pressed clinical environment, the ability to achieve
admission reliably on the day of surgery, in patients at ease with
their situation and with little likelihood of late cancellation,
will be of great benefit. It will reduce litigation and improve
the patient experience. Cite this article:
Myxofibrosarcomas (MFSs) are malignant soft-tissue sarcomas characteristically
presenting as painless slowly growing masses in the extremities.
Locally infiltrative growth means that the risk of local recurrence
is high. We reviewed our experience to make recommendations about
resection strategies and the role of the multidisciplinary team
in the management of these tumours. Patients with a primary or recurrent MFS who were treated surgically
in our unit between 1997 and 2012 were included in the study. Clinical
records and imaging were reviewed. A total of 50 patients with a
median age of 68.4 years (interquartile range 61.6 to 81.8) were
included. There were 35 men; 49 underwent surgery in our unit.Aims
Patients and Methods
The October 2015 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Smoking and complications in arthroplasty; Smoking cessation beneficial in arthroplasty; Intermediate care and arthroplasty; Do we still need cell salvage?; Femoroacetabular impingement in the Japanese population; Trunnionosis or taperosis and geometry; Decontamination for staphylococcus aureus works!; Policeman or opportunity? Quality improvement with registries; Death rates higher in readmission to other hospitals
The extent and depth of routine health care data
are growing at an ever-increasing rate, forming huge repositories
of information. These repositories can answer a vast array of questions.
However, an understanding of the purpose of the dataset used and
the quality of the data collected are paramount to determine the
reliability of the result obtained. This Editorial describes the importance of adherence to sound
methodological principles in the reporting and publication of research
using ‘big’ data, with a suggested reporting framework for future Cite this article:
Fractures of the hip are common, often occurring
in frail elderly patients, but also in younger fit healthy patients following
trauma. They have a significant associated mortality and major social
and financial implications to patients and health care providers.
Many guidelines are available for the management of these patients,
mostly recommending early surgery for the best outcomes. As a result,
healthcare authorities now put pressure on surgical teams to ‘fast
track’ patients with a fracture of the hip, often misquoting the
available literature, which in itself can be confusing and even
conflicting. This paper has been written following an extensive review of
the available literature. An attempt is made to clarify what is
meant by early surgery (expeditious Cite this article:
Hip fracture is a common injury associated with
high mortality, long-term disability and huge socio-economic burden.
Yet there has been relatively little research into best treatment,
and evidence that has been generated has often been criticised for
its poor quality. Here, we discuss the advances made towards overcoming
these criticisms and the future directions for hip fracture research:
how co-ordinating existing national infrastructures and use of now
established clinical research networks will likely go some way towards
overcoming the practical and financial challenges of conducting
large trials. We highlight the importance of large collaborative
pragmatic trials to inform decision/policy makers and the progress
made towards reaching a consensus on a core outcome set to facilitate data
pooling for evidence synthesis and meta-analysis. These advances and future directions are a priority in order
to establish the high-quality evidence base required for this important
group of patients. Cite this article:
We wished to examine the effectiveness of tibial lengthening
using a two ring Ilizarov frame in skeletally immature patients.
This is a potentially biomechanically unstable construct which risks
the loss of axial control. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 24 boys and
26 girls, with a mean age of 8.6 years (4 to 14), who underwent
52 tibial lengthening procedures with a mean follow-up of 4.3 years
(4.0 to 16.9). Tibial alignment was measured before and after treatment
using joint orientation lines from the knee and a calculation of
the oblique plane axis.Aims
Patients and Methods
Flail chest from a blunt injury to the thorax is associated with
significant morbidity and mortality. Its management globally is
predominantly non-operative; however, there are an increasing number
of centres which undertake surgical stabilisation. The aim of this
meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of this approach with
that of non-operative management. A systematic search of the literature was carried out to identify
randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the clinical
outcome of patients with a traumatic flail chest treated by surgical
stabilisation of any kind with that of non-operative management.Aims
Patients and Methods
We present the medium-term clinical results of a reverse total
shoulder arthroplasty with a trabecular metal glenoid base plate. We reviewed 125 consecutive primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasties
(RTSA) implanted in 124 patients for rotator cuff arthropathy. There
were 100 women and 24 men in the study group with a mean age of
76 years (58 to 89). The mean follow-up was 32 months (24 to 60).
No patient was lost to follow-up.Aim
Patients and Methods