The December 2014 Wrist &
Hand Roundup360 looks at: ultrasound for carpal tunnel diagnosis; where we are at with management of undisplaced scaphoid fractures; ARPE for thumb metacarpals?; extravasation injuries in the hand and wrist; research and practice in hand surgery; and physio ineffective in hand osteoarthritis
The December 2014 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Charcot feet, biomarkers and diabetes; weight bearing following Achilles tendon rupture; endobuttons and mal-reduced diastasis; evidence for stem cell therapies in osteochondral lesions of the talus; syndesmosis fixation in SER ankle fractures; and self-reporting for foot and ankle outcomes.
In In a hip fracture experiment, nine pairs of human cadaver femurs
were tested in a paired study design. The femurs were then re-matched
according to BMD, creating two new test groups. Intra-pair variance
and paired correlations in fixation stability were calculated. A
hypothetical power analysis was then performed to explore the required sample
size for the two types of group allocation. Objective
Methods
Minimal clinically important differences (MCID)
in the scores of patient-reported outcome measures allow clinicians to
assess the outcome of intervention from the perspective of the patient.
There has been significant variation in their absolute values in
previous publications and a lack of consistency in their calculation. The purpose of this study was first, to establish whether these
values, following spinal surgery, vary depending on the surgical
intervention and their method of calculation and secondly, to assess
whether there is any correlation between the two external anchors
most frequently used to calculate the MCID. We carried out a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered
data of adult patients who underwent elective spinal surgery between
1994 and 2009. A total of 244 patients were included. There were
125 men and 119 women with a mean age of 54 years (16 to 84); the
mean follow-up was 62 months (6 to 199) The MCID was calculated
using three previously published methods. Our results show that the value of the MCID varies considerably
with the operation and its method of calculation. There was good
correlation between the two external anchors. The global outcome
tool correlated significantly better. We conclude that consensus needs to be reached on the best method
of calculating the MCID. This then needs to be defined for each
spinal procedure. Using a blanket value for the MCID for all spinal
procedures should be avoided. Cite this article:
The December 2014 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at: cuff tears and plexus injury; corticosteroids and physiotherapy in SAI; diabetes and elbow arthroplasty; distal biceps tendon repairs; shockwave therapy in frozen shoulder; hydrodilation and steroids for adhesive capsulitis; just what do our patients read?; and what happens to that stable radial head fracture?
The purpose of this study was to compare the
diagnostic accuracy for the detection of infection between the culture of
fluid obtained by sonication (SFC) and the culture of peri-implant
tissues (PITC) in patients with early and delayed implant failure,
and those with unsuspected and suspected septic failure. It was
hypothesised that SFC increases the diagnostic accuracy for infection
in delayed, but not early, implant failure, and in unsuspected septic
failure. The diagnostic accuracy for infection of all consecutive
implants (hardware or prostheses) that were removed for failure was
compared between SFC and PITC. This prospective study included 317
patients with a mean age of 62.7 years (9 to 97). The sensitivity
for detection of infection using SFC was higher than using PITC
in an overall comparison (89.9% Sonication is mainly recommended when there is implant failure
with no clear signs of infection and in patients with delayed implant
failure. In early failure, SFC is not superior to PITC for the diagnosis
of infection and, therefore, is not recommended as a routine diagnostic
test in these patients. Cite this article:
Unstable pelvic injuries in young children with
an immature pelvis have different modes of failure from those in adolescents
and adults. We describe the pathoanatomy of unstable pelvic injuries
in these children, and the incidence of associated avulsion of the
iliac apophysis and fracture of the ipsilateral fifth lumbar transverse
process (L5-TP). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records
of 33 children with Tile types B and C pelvic injuries admitted
between 2007 and 2014; their mean age was 12.6 years (2 to 18) and
12 had an immature pelvis. Those with an immature pelvis commonly
sustained symphyseal injuries anteriorly with diastasis, rather
than the fractures of the pubic rami seen in adolescents. Posteriorly,
transsacral fractures were more commonly encountered in mature children,
whereas sacroiliac dislocations and fracture-dislocations were seen
in both age groups. Avulsion of the iliac apophysis was identified
in eight children, all of whom had an immature pelvis with an intact
ipsilateral L5-TP. Young children with an immature pelvis are more
susceptible to pubic symphysis and sacroiliac diastasis, whereas
bony failures are more common in adolescents. Unstable pelvic injuries
in young children are commonly associated with avulsion of the iliac
apophysis, particularly with displaced SI joint dislocation and
an intact ipsilateral L5-TP. Cite this article:
Advances in the treatment of periprosthetic joint
infections of the hip have once more pushed prosthesis preserving techniques
into the limelight. At the same time, the common infecting organisms
are evolving to become more resistant to conventional antimicrobial
agents. Whilst the epidemiology of resistant staphylococci is changing,
a number of recent reports have advocated the use of irrigation
and debridement and one-stage revision for the treatment of periprosthetic
joint infections due to resistant organisms. This review presents
the available evidence for the treatment of periprosthetic joint
infections of the hip, concentrating in particular on methicillin
resistant staphylococci. Cite this article:
The lack of an accurate, rapid diagnostic test
for mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) is a major handicap in the management
of spinal TB. GeneXpert, a new, rapid molecular diagnostic test
is recommended as the first line investigation for suspected pulmonary
TB in areas with a high prevalence of HIV or drug resistance, yet
it has not been validated for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal TB. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of GeneXpert
in diagnosing spinal TB. A prospective clinical study of 69 consecutive adults with suspected
spinal TB was conducted at a tertiary hospital in an area with the
highest incidence and prevalence of TB in the world. GeneXpert was
used on tissue samples of the enrolled patients and its diagnostic
accuracy compared with a reference standard of tissue in liquid culture.
A total of 71 spine samples from 69 patients (two re-biopsies) were
included in the study. The GeneXpert test showed a sensitivity of 95.6% and specificity
of 96.2% for spinal TB. The results of the GeneXpert test were available
within 48 hours compared with a median of 35 days (IQR 15 to 43)
for cultures. All cases of multi-drug resistant TB (MDR TB) were
diagnosed accurately with the GeneXpert test. The MDR TB rate was
5.8%. Cite this article:
The August 2014 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Serial MRIs best for pseudotumour surveillance; Is ultrasound good enough for MOM follow-up?; Does weight loss in obese patients help?; Measuring acetabular anteversion on plain films; Two-stage one-stage too many in fungal hip revisions? and 35 is the magic number in arthroplasty.
The August 2014 Knee Roundup360 looks at: re-admission following total knee replacement; out with the old and in with the new? computer navigation revisited; approach less important in knee replacement; is obesity driving a rise in knee replacements?; knee replacement isn’t cheap in the obese; cruciate substitution doesn’t increase knee flexion; and sonication useful diagnostic aid in two-stage revision.
Epidemiological studies enhance clinical practice
in a number of ways. However, there are many methodological difficulties
that need to be addressed in designing a study aimed at the collection
and analysis of data concerning fractures and other injuries. Most
can be managed and errors minimised if careful attention is given
to the design and implementation of the research. Cite this article:
The August 2014 Trauma Roundup360 looks at: On-table CT for calcaneal fractures; timing of femoral fracture surgery and outcomes; salvage arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of the femoral neck; screw insertion in osteoporotic bone; fibular intramedullary nailing on the ascendant; posterior wall acetabular fractures not all that innocent; bugs, plating and resistance and improving outcomes in olecranon tension band wiring.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is an important cause of
pain, disability and economic loss in humans, and is similarly important in
the horse. Recent knowledge on post-traumatic OA has suggested opportunities
for early intervention, but it is difficult to identify the appropriate
time of these interventions. The horse provides two useful mechanisms
to answer these questions: 1) extensive experience with clinical
OA in horses; and 2) use of a consistently predictable model of
OA that can help study early pathobiological events, define targets
for therapeutic intervention and then test these putative therapies.
This paper summarises the syndromes of clinical OA in horses including
pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment, and details controlled studies
of various treatment options using an equine model of clinical OA.
Substantial healthcare resources have been devoted
to computer navigation and patient-specific instrumentation systems
that improve the reproducibility with which neutral mechanical alignment
can be achieved following total knee replacement (TKR). This choice of
alignment is based on the long-held tenet that the alignment of
the limb post-operatively should be within 3° of a neutral mechanical
axis. Several recent studies have demonstrated no significant difference
in survivorship when comparing well aligned Review of the literature suggests that a neutral mechanical axis
remains the optimal guide to alignment. Cite this article:
