This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group. A total of 139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided robotic arm-assisted system. Outcome measures included the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, Short Form-12, Pain Catastrophising Scale, somatic disease (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Score), Pain visual analogue scale, analgesic use, patient satisfaction, complications relating to surgery, 90-day pain diaries and the requirement for revision surgery.Objectives
Methods
The use of robotics in arthroplasty surgery is expanding rapidly as improvements in the technology evolve. This article examines current evidence to justify the usage of robotics, as well as the future potential in this emerging field.
This paper describes the methodology, validation and reliability
of a new computer-assisted method which uses models of the patient’s
bones and the components to measure their migration and polyethylene
wear from radiographs after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Models of the patient’s acetabular and femoral component obtained
from the manufacturer and models of the patient’s pelvis and femur
built from a single computed tomography (CT) scan, are used by a
computer program to measure the migration of the components and
the penetration of the femoral head from anteroposterior and lateral radiographs
taken at follow-up visits. The program simulates the radiographic
setup and matches the position and orientation of the models to
outlines of the pelvis, the acetabular and femoral component, and
femur on radiographs. Changes in position and orientation reflect
the migration of the components and the penetration of the femoral
head. Validation was performed using radiographs of phantoms simulating
known migration and penetration, and the clinical feasibility of
measuring migration was assessed in two patients.Aims
Materials and Methods
Preservation of both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to near-normal post-operative joint mechanics and improved knee function. We hypothesised that a patient-specific bicruciate-retaining prosthesis preserves near-normal kinematics better than standard off-the-shelf posterior cruciate-retaining and bicruciate-retaining prostheses in TKA. We developed the validated models to evaluate the post-operative kinematics in patient-specific bicruciate-retaining, standard off-the-shelf bicruciate-retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining TKA under gait and deep knee bend loading conditions using numerical simulation.Objectives
Methods
The aims of this study were to determine the proportion of patients
with outlier varus or valgus alignment in kinematically aligned
total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whether those with outlier varus
or valgus alignment have higher forces in the medial or lateral
compartments of the knee than those with in-range alignment and
whether measurements of the alignment of the limb, knee and components
predict compartment forces. The intra-operative forces in the medial and lateral compartments
were measured with an instrumented tibial insert in 67 patients
who underwent a kinematically aligned TKA during passive movement.
The mean of the forces at full extension, 45° and 90° of flexion
determined the force in the medial and lateral compartments. Measurements
of the alignment of the limb and the components included the hip-knee-ankle
(HKA) angle, proximal medial tibial angle (PMTA), and distal lateral
femoral angle (DLFA). Measurements of the alignment of the knee
and the components included the tibiofemoral angle (TFA), tibial
component angle (TCA) and femoral component angle (FCA). Alignment was
measured on post-operative, non-weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP)
scanograms and categorised as varus or valgus outlier or in-range
in relation to mechanically aligned criteria.Aims
Patients and Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a demanding procedure, with tibial component subsidence or pain from high tibial strain being potential causes of revision. The optimal position in terms of load transfer has not been documented for lateral UKA. Our aim was to determine the effect of tibial component position on proximal tibial strain. A total of 16 composite tibias were implanted with an Oxford Domed Lateral Partial Knee implant using cutting guides to define tibial slope and resection depth. Four implant positions were assessed: standard (5° posterior slope); 10° posterior slope; 5° reverse tibial slope; and 4 mm increased tibial resection. Using an electrodynamic axial-torsional materials testing machine (Instron 5565), a compressive load of 1.5 kN was applied at 60 N/s on a meniscal bearing via a matching femoral component. Tibial strain beneath the implant was measured using a calibrated Digital Image Correlation system.Objectives
Methods
In the time since Letournel popularised the surgical
treatment of acetabular fractures, more than 25 years ago, there
have been many changes within the field, related to patients, surgical
technique, implants and post-operative care. However, the long-term
outcomes appear largely unchanged. Does this represent stasis or
have the advances been mitigated by other negative factors? In this
article we have attempted to document the recent changes within
the surgery of patients with a fracture involving the acetabulum,
outline contemporary management, and identify the major problem
areas where further research is most needed. Cite this article:
Anatomical total knee arthroplasty alignment
To prevent insufficiency of the triceps after
total elbow arthroplasty, we have, since 2008, used a triceps-sparing ulnar
approach. This study evaluates the clinical results and post-operative
alignment of the prosthesis using this approach. We reviewed 25 elbows in 23 patients. There were five men and
18 women with a mean age of 69 years (54 to 83). There were 18 elbows
with rheumatoid arthritis, six with a fracture or pseudoarthrosis
and one elbow with osteoarthritis. Post-operative complications included one intra-operative fracture,
one elbow with heterotopic ossification, one transient ulnar nerve
palsy, and one elbow with skin necrosis, but no elbow was affected
by insufficiency of the triceps. Patients were followed for a mean of 42 months (24 to 77). The
mean post-operative Japanese Orthopaedic Association Elbow Score
was 90.8 (51 to 100) and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance score 93.8
(65 to 100). The mean post-operative flexion/extension of the elbow
was 135°/-8°. The Manual Muscle Testing score of the triceps was
5 in 23 elbows and 2 in two elbows (one patient). The mean alignment
of the implants examined by 3D-CT was 2.8° pronation (standard deviation
( The triceps-sparing ulnar approach allows satisfactory alignment
of the implants, is effective in preventing post-operative triceps
insufficiency, and gives satisfactory short-term results. Cite this article: 2015;97-B:1096–1101.
Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) uses advanced
imaging of the knee (CT or MRI) to generate individualised cutting
blocks aimed to make the procedure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
more accurate and efficient. However, in this era of healthcare
cost consciousness, the value of new technologies needs to be critically
evaluated. There have been several comparative studies looking at
PSI Cite this article:
This review examines the future of total hip arthroplasty, aiming to avoid past mistakes
The December 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Albumin and complications in knee arthroplasty; Tantalum: a knee fixation for all seasons?; Dynamic knee alignment; Tibial component design in UKA; Managing the tidal wave of revision knee arthroplasty; Scoring pain in TKR; Does anyone have a ‘normal’ tibial slope?; XLPE in TKR? A five-year clinical study; Spacers and infected revision arthroplasties; Dialysis and arthroplasty
The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for prosthetic
joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The New Zealand Joint Registry database was analysed, using revision
surgery for PJI at six and 12 months after surgery as primary outcome
measures. Statistical associations between revision for infection,
with common and definable surgical and patient factors were tested.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aims of this retrospective study were to report the feasibility
of using 3D-printing technology for patients with a pelvic tumour
who underwent reconstruction. A total of 35 patients underwent resection of a pelvic tumour
and reconstruction using 3D-printed endoprostheses between September
2013 and December 2015. According to Enneking’s classification of
bone defects, there were three Type I lesions, 12 Type II+III lesions,
five Type I+II lesions, two Type I+II+III lesions, ten type I+II+IV
lesions and three type I+II+III+IV lesions. A total of three patients
underwent reconstruction using an iliac prosthesis, 12 using a standard
hemipelvic prosthesis and 20 using a screw-rod connected hemipelvic
prosthesis.Aims
Patients and Methods
The December 2013 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Peri-articular resection fraught with complications; Navigated margins; Skeletal tumours and thromboembolism; Conditional survival in Ewing’s sarcoma; Reverse shoulders and tumour; For how long should we follow up sarcoma patients?; and already metastasised?
