header advert
Results 221 - 240 of 1147
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1681 - 1686
1 Dec 2013
Peach CA Nicoletti S Lawrence TM Stanley D

We report our experience of staged revision surgery for the treatment of infected total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Between 1998 and 2010 a consecutive series of 33 patients (34 TEAs) underwent a first-stage procedure with the intention to proceed to second-stage procedure when the infection had been controlled. A single first-stage procedure with removal of the components and cement was undertaken for 29 TEAs (85%), followed by the insertion of antibiotic-impregnated cement beads, and five (15%) required two or more first-stage procedures. The most common organism isolated was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 21 TEAs (62%).

A second-stage procedure was performed for 26 TEAs (76%); seven patients (seven TEAs, 21%) had a functional resection arthroplasty with antibiotic beads in situ and had no further surgery, one had a persistent discharge preventing further surgery.

There were three recurrent infections (11.5%) in those patients who underwent a second-stage procedure. The infection presented at a mean of eight months (5 to 10) post-operatively. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) in those who underwent a second stage revision without recurrent infection was 81.1 (65 to 95).

Staged revision surgery is successful in the treatment of patients with an infected TEA and is associated with a low rate of recurrent infection. However, when infection does occur, this study would suggest that it becomes apparent within ten months of the second stage procedure.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1681–6.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1158 - 1164
1 Sep 2013
Ahmad Z Siddiqui N Malik SS Abdus-Samee M Tytherleigh-Strong G Rushton N

Lateral epicondylitis, or ’tennis elbow’, is a common condition that usually affects patients between 35 and 55 years of age. It is generally self-limiting, but in some patients it may continue to cause persistent symptoms, which can be refractory to treatment. This review discusses the mechanism of disease, symptoms and signs, investigations, current management protocols and potential new treatments.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1158–64.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 5 | Pages 857 - 857
1 Sep 1996
Glasgow M


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 72-B, Issue 4 | Pages 728 - 729
1 Jul 1990
Stanley D Winson I


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 86-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1220 - 1221
1 Nov 2004
CHOUDHARY RK AHMED HA


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 1 | Pages 151 - 151
1 Jan 2002
Read M


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 81-B, Issue 1 | Pages 184 - 184
1 Jan 1999
Watson MS


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 35-B, Issue 1 | Pages 50 - 54
1 Feb 1953
King T


Objectives

Local corticosteroid infiltration is a common practice of treatment for lateral epicondylitis. In recent studies no statistically significant or clinically relevant results in favour of corticosteroid injections were found. The injection of autologous blood has been reported to be effective for both intermediate and long-term outcomes. It is hypothesised that blood contains growth factors, which induce the healing cascade.

Methods

A total of 60 patients were included in this prospective randomised study: 30 patients received 2 ml autologous blood drawn from contralateral upper limb vein + 1 ml 0.5% bupivacaine, and 30 patients received 2 ml local corticosteroid + 1 ml 0.5% bupivacaine at the lateral epicondyle. Outcome was measured using a pain score and Nirschl staging of lateral epicondylitis. Follow-up was continued for total of six months, with assessment at one week, four weeks, 12 weeks and six months.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 7 | Pages 1089 - 1089
1 Sep 2002
Stanley D


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 76-B, Issue 5 | Pages 848 - 849
1 Sep 1994
Adeniran A Merriam W


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 32-B, Issue 3 | Pages 348 - 360
1 Aug 1950
Roberts N Hughes R


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 4, Issue 1 | Pages 19 - 26
13 Jan 2023
Nishida K Nasu Y Hashizume K Okita S Nakahara R Saito T Ozaki T Inoue H

Aims. There are concerns regarding complications and longevity of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) in young patients, and the few previous publications are mainly limited to reports on linked elbow devices. We investigated the clinical outcome of unlinked TEA for patients aged less than 50 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 26 elbows of 21 patients with RA who were aged less than 50 years who underwent primary TEA with an unlinked elbow prosthesis. The mean patient age was 46 years (35 to 49), and the mean follow-up period was 13.6 years (6 to 27). Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), radiological evaluation for radiolucent line and loosening, complications, and revision surgery with or without implant removal. Results. The mean MEPS significantly improved from 47 (15 to 70) points preoperatively to 95 (70 to 100) points at final follow-up (p < 0.001). Complications were noted in six elbows (23%) in six patients, and of these, four with an ulnar neuropathy and one elbow with postoperative traumatic fracture required additional surgeries. There was no revision with implant removal, and there was no radiological evidence of loosening around the components. With any revision surgery as the endpoint, the survival rates up to 25 years were 78.1% (95% confidence interval 52.8 to 90.6) as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Conclusion. The clinical outcome of primary unlinked TEA for young patients with RA was satisfactory and comparable with that for elderly patients. A favourable survival rate without implant removal might support the use of unlinked devices for young patients with this disease entity, with a caution of a relatively high complication rate regarding ulnar neuropathy. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(1):19–26


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 85-B, Issue 4 | Pages 622 - 622
1 May 2003
Souter WA


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 2 | Pages 305 - 305
1 Mar 2002
AGARWAL M


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 7 | Pages 1084 - 1084
1 Sep 2001
ANKARATH S GIANNOUDIS PV


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 5 | Pages 857 - 857
1 Sep 1996
Frostick SP


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 72-B, Issue 3 | Pages 523 - 524
1 May 1990
Parkinson R Hodgson S Noble J


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 72-B, Issue 3 | Pages 520 - 520
1 May 1990
Kocialkowski A Wallace W


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 71-B, Issue 1 | Pages 145 - 146
1 Jan 1989
Irvine G Gregg P