The demand for spinal surgery and its costs have both risen over the past decade. In 2008 the aggregate hospital bill for surgical care of all spinal procedures was reported to be $33.9 billion. One key driver of rising costs is spinal implants. In 2011 our institution implemented a cost containment programme for spinal implants which was designed to reduce the prices of individual spinal implants and to reduce the inter-surgeon variation in implant costs. Between February 2012 and January 2013, our spinal surgeons performed 1493 spinal procedures using implants from eight different vendors. By applying market analysis and implant cost data from the previous year, we established references prices for each individual type of spinal implant, regardless of vendor, who were required to meet these unit prices. We found that despite the complexity of spinal surgery and the initial reluctance of vendors to reduce prices, significant savings were made to the medical centre.

Cite this article: 2015; 97-B:1102–5.

We have treated seven patients with cryptococcal spondylitis. Five presented with a neurological deficit and one was HIV-positive. Amphotericin-B and 5-flucytosine were used in five patients and ketoconazole was given orally in the remaining two. Three patients made a complete neurological recovery. Since these lesions mimic spinal tuberculosis, which is commonly seen in our environment, we draw attention to the importance of obtaining a tissue diagnosis.

In spinal tuberculosis MRI can clearly demonstrate combinations of anterior and posterior lesions as well as pedicular involvement. We propose a classification system, using information provided by MRI, to help to plan the appropriate surgical treatment for patients with thoracic spinal tuberculosis. We describe a series of 47 patients, divided into four groups, based on the surgical protocol used in the management. Group A consisted of patients with anterior lesions which were stable with no kyphotic deformity, and were treated with anterior debridement and strut grafting. Group B comprised patients with global lesions, kyphosis and instability who were treated with posterior instrumentation using a closed-loop rectangle with sublaminar wires, and by anterior strut grafting. Group C were patients with anterior or global lesions as in the previous groups, but who were at a high risk for transthoracic surgery because of medical and possible anaesthetic complications. These patients had a global decompression of the cord posteriorly, the anterior portion of the cord being approached through a transpedicular route. Posterior instrumentation was with a closed-loop rectangle held by sublaminar wires. Group D comprised patients with isolated posterior lesions which required posterior decompression only.

An understanding of the extent of vertebral destruction can be obtained from MRI studies. This information can be used to plan appropriate surgery.