Fungal and mycobacterial periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are rare events. Clinicians are wary of missing these diagnoses, often leading to the routine ordering of fungal and mycobacterial cultures on periprosthetic specimens. Our goal was to examine the utility of these cultures and explore a modern bacterial culture technique using bacterial blood culture bottles (BCBs) as an alternative. We performed a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with hip or knee PJI between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019, at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, USA. We included patients aged 18 years or older who had fungal, mycobacterial, or both cultures performed together with bacterial cultures. Cases with positive fungal or mycobacterial cultures were reviewed using the electronic medical record to classify the microbiological findings as representing true infection or not.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare the
diagnostic accuracy for the detection of infection between the culture of
fluid obtained by sonication (SFC) and the culture of peri-implant
tissues (PITC) in patients with early and delayed implant failure,
and those with unsuspected and suspected septic failure. It was
hypothesised that SFC increases the diagnostic accuracy for infection
in delayed, but not early, implant failure, and in unsuspected septic
failure. The diagnostic accuracy for infection of all consecutive
implants (hardware or prostheses) that were removed for failure was
compared between SFC and PITC. This prospective study included 317
patients with a mean age of 62.7 years (9 to 97). The sensitivity
for detection of infection using SFC was higher than using PITC
in an overall comparison (89.9% Sonication is mainly recommended when there is implant failure
with no clear signs of infection and in patients with delayed implant
failure. In early failure, SFC is not superior to PITC for the diagnosis
of infection and, therefore, is not recommended as a routine diagnostic
test in these patients. Cite this article:
We reviewed the outcome of 69 uncemented, custom-made,
distal femoral endoprosthetic replacements performed in 69 patients
between 1994 and 2006. There were 31 women and 38 men with a mean
age at implantation of 16.5 years (5 to 37). All procedures were
performed for primary malignant bone tumours of the distal femur.
At a mean follow-up of 124.2 months (4 to 212), 53 patients were
alive, with one patient lost to follow-up. All nine implants (13.0%)
were revised due to aseptic loosening at a mean of 52 months (8
to 91); three implants (4.3%) were revised due to fracture of the
shaft of the prosthesis and three patients (4.3%) had a peri-prosthetic
fracture. Bone remodelling associated with periosteal cortical thinning
adjacent to the uncemented intramedullary stem was seen in 24 patients
but this did not predispose to failure. All aseptically loose implants
in this series were diagnosed to be loose within the first five
years. The results from this study suggest that custom-made uncemented
distal femur replacements have a higher rate of aseptic loosening
compared to published results for this design when used with cemented
fixation. Loosening of uncemented replacements occurs early indicating
that initial fixation of the implant is crucial. Cite this article:
