Peri-acetabular tumour resections and their subsequent
reconstruction are among the most challenging procedures in orthopaedic
oncology. Despite the fact that a number of different pelvic endoprostheses
have been introduced, rates of complication remain high and long-term
results are mostly lacking. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the outcome
of reconstructing a peri-acetabular defect with a pedestal cup endoprosthesis
after a type 2 or type 2/3 internal hemipelvectomy. A total of 19 patients (11M:8F) with a mean age of 48 years (14
to 72) were included, most of whom had been treated for a primary
bone tumour (n = 16) between 2003 and 2009. After a mean follow-up
of 39 months (28 days to 8.7 years) seven patients had died. After
a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (4.3 to 10.5), 12 patients were alive,
of whom 11 were disease-free. Complications occurred in 15 patients.
Three had recurrent dislocations and three experienced aseptic loosening.
There were no mechanical failures. Infection occurred in nine patients,
six of whom required removal of the prosthesis. Two patients underwent
hindquarter amputation for local recurrence. The implant survival rate at five years was 50% for all reasons,
and 61% for non-oncological reasons. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor
Society score at final follow-up was 49% (13 to 87). Based on these poor results, we advise caution if using the pedestal
cup for reconstruction of a peri-acetabular tumour resection. Cite this article:
We report our early experience with the use of
a new prosthesis, the Modular Hemipelvic Prosthesis II, for reconstruction
of the hemipelvis after resection of a primary malignant peri-acetabular
tumour involving the sacroiliac joint. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 17 patients who had
undergone resection of a pelvic tumour and reconstruction with this
prosthesis between July 2002 and July 2010. One patient had a type I+II+III+IV resection (ilium + peri-acetabulum
+ pubis/ischium + sacrum) and 16 had a type I+II+IV resection (ilium
+ acetabulum + sacrum). The outcome was assessed at a mean follow-up
of 33 months (15 to 59). One patient was alive with disease, 11
were alive without disease and five had died of disease. The overall
five-year survival rate was 62.4%. Six patients had a local recurrence.
The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 58% (33 to 77).
Deep infection occurred in two patients, problems with wound healing
in five and dislocation in one. For patients with a primary malignant peri-acetabular sarcoma
involving the sacroiliac joint, we believe that this new prosthesis
is a viable option for reconstruction of the bony defect left following
resection of the tumour. It results in a satisfactory functional
outcome with an acceptable rate of complications. Cite this article:
