The February 2024 Foot & Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Survival of revision ankle arthroplasty; Tibiotalocalcaneal nail for the management of open ankle fractures in the elderly patient; Accuracy of a patient-specific total ankle arthroplasty instrumentation; Fusion after failed primary ankle arthroplasty: can it work?; Treatment options for osteochondral lesions of the talus; Managing hair tourniquet syndrome of toe: a rare emergency; Ultrasound-guided collagenase therapy for recurrent plantar fibromatosis: a promising line of therapy?.
Aims. The number of revision total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) which are undertaken is increasing. Few studies have reported the survival after this procedure. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the survival of revision ankle arthroplasties using large datasets. Secondary aims were to summarize the demographics of the patients, the indications for revision TAA, further operations, and predictors of survival. Methods. The study combined data from the National Joint Registry and NHS Digital to report the survival of revision TAA. We have previously reported the failure rates and risk factors for failure after TAA, and the outcome of fusion after a failed TAA, using the same methodology. Survival was assessed using life tables and Kaplan Meier graphs. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to compare failure rates. Results. A total of 228 patients underwent revision TAA. The mean follow-up was 2.6 years (SD 2.0). The mean time between the initial procedure and revision was 2.3 years (SD 1.8). The most commonly used implant was the Inbone which was used in 81 patients. A total of 29 (12.7%) failed; nine (3.9%) patients underwent a further revision, 19 (8.3%) underwent a fusion, and one (0.4%) had an amputation. The rate of survival was 95.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 91.6 to 97.5) at one year, 87.7% (95% CI 81.9 to 91.7; n = 124) at three years and 77.5% (95% CI 66.9 to 85.0; n = 57) at five years. Revision-specific implants had a better survival than when primary implants were used at revision. A total of 50 patients (21.9%) had further surgery; 19 (8.3%) underwent reoperation in the first 12 months. Cox regression models were prepared. In crude analysis the only significant risk factors for failure were the use of cement (hazard ratio (HR) 3.02 (95% CI 1.13 to 8.09)) and the time since the primary procedure (HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.97)). No risk factors for failure were identified in multivariable Cox regression modelling. Conclusion.
Revision rates for ankle arthroplasties are higher than hip or knee arthroplasties. When a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) fails, it can either undergo revision to another ankle replacement, revision of the TAA to ankle arthrodesis (fusion), or amputation. Currently there is a paucity of literature on the outcomes of these revisions. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the outcomes of revision TAA with respect to surgery type, functional outcomes, and reoperations. A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Cochrane reviews were searched for relevant papers. Papers analyzing surgical treatment for failed ankle arthroplasties were included. All papers were reviewed by two authors. Overall, 34 papers met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed.Aims
Methods
A failed total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is often associated with
much bone loss. As an alternative to arthrodesis, the surgeon may
consider a custom-made talar component to compensate for the bone
loss. Our aim in this study was to assess the functional and radiological
outcome after the use of such a component at mid- to long-term follow-up. A total of 12 patients (five women and seven men, mean age 53
years; 36 to77) with a failed TAA and a large talar defect underwent
a revision procedure using a custom-made talar component. The design
of the custom-made components was based on CT scans and standard
radiographs, when compared with the contralateral ankle. After the
anterior talocalcaneal joint was fused, the talar component was
introduced and fixed to the body of the calcaneum.Aims
Patients and Methods
The incidence of periprosthetic fractures of
the ankle is increasing. However, little is known about the outcome
of treatment and their management remains controversial. The aim
of this study was to assess the impact of periprosthetic fractures
on the functional and radiological outcome of patients with a total
ankle arthroplasty (TAA). A total of 505 TAAs (488 patients) who underwent TAA were retrospectively
evaluated for periprosthetic ankle fracture: these were then classified
according to a recent classification which is orientated towards
treatment. The outcome was evaluated clinically using the American
Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and a visual analogue
scale for pain, and radiologically. A total of 21 patients with a periprosthetic fracture of the
ankle were identified. There were 13 women and eight men. The mean
age of the patients was 63 years (48 to 74). Thus, the incidence
of fracture was 4.17%. There were 11 intra-operative and ten post-operative fractures,
of which eight were stress fractures and two were traumatic. The
prosthesis was stable in all patients. Five stress fractures were
treated conservatively and the remaining three were treated operatively. A total of 17 patients (81%) were examined clinically and radiologically
at a mean follow-up of 53.5 months (12 to 112). The mean AOFAS score
at follow-up was 79.5 (21 to 100). The mean AOFAS score in those
with an intra-operative fracture was 87.6 (80 to 100) and for those
with a stress fracture, which were mainly because of varus malpositioning,
was 67.3 (21 to 93). Periprosthetic fractures of the ankle do not
necessarily adversely affect the clinical outcome, provided that
a treatment algorithm is implemented with the help of a new classification
system. Cite this article:
