Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 6 | Pages 372 - 374
8 Jun 2023
Makaram NS Lamb SE Simpson AHRW

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(6):372–374.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 9 | Pages 591 - 593
7 Sep 2021
Thompson JW Simpson AHRW Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Feb 2020
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 2 | Pages 145 - 147
1 Feb 2020
Ollivere B Metcalfe D Perry DC Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 6 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Dec 2019
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 2 | Pages 121 - 123
1 Feb 2019
Robinson AHN Johnson-Lynn SE Humphrey JA Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 150
1 Feb 2017
Costa ML Tutton E Achten J Grant R Slowther AM

Traditionally, informed consent for clinical research involves the patient reading an approved Participant Information Sheet, considering the information presented and having as much time as they need to discuss the study information with their friends and relatives, their clinical care and the research teams. This system works well in the ‘planned’ or ‘elective’ setting. But what happens if the patient requires urgent treatment for an injury or emergency?

This article reviews the legal framework which governs informed consent in the emergency setting, discusses how the approach taken may vary according to the details of the emergency and the treatment required, and reports on the patients’ view of providing consent following a serious injury. We then provide some practical tips for managing the process of informed consent in the context of injuries and emergencies.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:147–150.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 151
1 Feb 2016
Haddad FS McLawhorn AS

Health economic evaluations potentially provide valuable information to clinicians, health care administrators, and policy makers regarding the financial implications of decisions about the care of patients. The highest quality research should be used to inform decisions that have direct impact on the access to care and the outcome of treatment. However, economic analyses are often complex and use research methods which are relatively unfamiliar to clinicians. Furthermore, health economic data have substantial national, regional, and institutional variability, which can limit the external validity of the results of a study. Therefore, minimum guidelines that aim to standardise the quality and transparency of reporting health economic research have been developed, and instruments are available to assist in the assessment of its quality and the interpretation of results.

The purpose of this editorial is to discuss the principal types of health economic studies, to review the most common instruments for judging the quality of these studies and to describe current reporting guidelines. Recommendations for the submission of these types of studies to The Bone & Joint Journal are provided.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:147–51.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 3, Issue 3 | Pages 48 - 50
1 Mar 2014
Lidgren L Gomez-Barrena E N. Duda G Puhl W Carr A


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 1 | Pages 2 - 3
1 Jan 2013
Costa ML Stengel D Griffin XL Carey Smith R Parsons N


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1593 - 1594
1 Dec 2005
Carr AJ