Aims. The advent of
The use of a porous metal shell supported by two augments with the ‘footing’ technique is one solution to manage Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to assess the medium-term implant survival and radiological and clinical outcomes of this technique. We undertook a retrospective, two-centre series of 39 hips in 39 patients (15 male, 24 female) treated with the ‘footing’ technique for Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects between 2007 and 2020. The median age at the time of surgery was 64.4 years (interquartile range (IQR) 54.4 to 71.0). The median follow-up was 3.9 years (IQR 3.1 to 7.0).Aims
Methods
The use of trabecular metal (TM) shells supported by augments has provided good mid-term results after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with a bony defect of the acetabulum. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term implant survivorship and radiological and clinical outcomes after acetabular revision using this technique. Between 2006 and 2010, 60 patients (62 hips) underwent acetabular revision using a combination of a TM shell and augment. A total of 51 patients (53 hips) had complete follow-up at a minimum of seven years and were included in the study. Of these patients, 15 were men (29.4%) and 36 were women (70.6%). Their mean age at the time of revision THA was 64.6 years (28 to 85). Three patients (5.2%) had a Paprosky IIA defect, 13 (24.5%) had a type IIB defect, six (11.3%) had a type IIC defect, 22 (41.5%) had a type IIIA defect, and nine (17%) had a type IIIB defect. Five patients (9.4%) also had pelvic discontinuity.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims. To evaluate the outcomes of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA)
following a fracture of the acetabulum, with evaluation of risk
factors and comparison with a patient group with no history of fracture. . Patients and Methods. Between 1992 and 2016, 49 patients (33 male) with mean age of
57 years (25 to 87) underwent cemented THA at a mean of 6.5 years
(0.1 to 25) following acetabular fracture. A total of 38 had undergone
surgical fixation and 11 had been treated non-operatively; 13 patients
died at a mean of 10.2 years after THA (0.6 to 19). Patients were
assessed pre-operatively, at one year and at final follow-up (mean
9.1 years, 0.5 to 23) using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Implant
survivorship was assessed. An age and gender-matched cohort of THAs
performed for non-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA) or avascular necrosis
(AVN) (n = 98) were used to compare complications and patient-reported outcome
measures (PROMs). Results. The mean time from fracture to THA was significantly shorter
for patients with AVN
(2.2 years) or protrusio (2.2 years) than those with post-traumatic
OA (9.4 years) or infection (8.0 years) (p = 0.03). Nine contained
and four uncontained defects were managed with autograft (n = 11),
bulk allograft (n = 1), or
Bone stock restoration of acetabular bone defects using impaction bone grafting (IBG) in total hip arthroplasty may facilitate future re-revision in the event of failure of the reconstruction. We hypothesized that the acetabular bone defect during re-revision surgery after IBG was smaller than during the previous revision surgery. The clinical and radiological results of re-revisions with repeated use of IBG were also analyzed. In a series of 382 acetabular revisions using IBG and a cemented component, 45 hips (45 patients) that had failed due to aseptic loosening were re-revised between 1992 and 2016. Acetabular bone defects graded according to Paprosky during the first and the re-revision surgery were compared. Clinical and radiological findings were analyzed over time. Survival analysis was performed using a competing risk analysis.Aims
Methods
Improvements in functional results and long-term survival are variable following conversion of hip fusion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and complications are high. The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical and functional results in patients who underwent conversion of hip fusion to THA using a consistent technique and uncemented implants. A total of 39 hip fusion conversions to THA were undertaken in 38 patients by a single surgeon employing a consistent surgical technique and uncemented implants. Parameters assessed included Harris Hip Score (HHS) for function, range of motion (ROM), leg length discrepancy (LLD), satisfaction, and use of walking aid. Radiographs were reviewed for loosening, subsidence, and heterotopic ossification (HO). Postoperative complications and implant survival were assessed.Aims
Methods
There is a paucity of long-term studies analyzing risk factors for failure after single-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We report the mid- to long-term septic and non-septic failure rate of single-stage revision for PJI after THA. We retrospectively reviewed 88 cases which met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI. Mean follow-up was seven years (1 to 14). Septic failure was diagnosed with a Delphi-based consensus definition. Any reoperation for mechanical causes in the absence of evidence of infection was considered as non-septic failure. A competing risk regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with septic and non-septic failures. A Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to analyze mortality.Aims
Methods
We aimed to report the mid- to long-term rates of septic and aseptic failure after two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We retrospectively reviewed 96 cases which met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI. The mean follow-up was 90 months (SD 32). Septic failure was assessed using a Delphi-based consensus definition. Any further surgery undertaken for aseptic mechanical causes was considered as aseptic failure. The cumulative incidence with competing risk analysis was used to predict the risk of septic failure. A regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with septic failure. The cumulative incidence of aseptic failure was also analyzed.Aims
Methods
Single-stage revision is not widely pursued due to restrictive inclusion criteria. In this study, we evaluated the results of single-stage revision of chronically infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) using broad inclusion criteria and cementless implants. Between 2010 and 2016, 126 patients underwent routine single-stage revision with cementless reconstruction with powdered vancomycin or imipenem poured into the medullary cavity and re-implantation of cementless components. For patients with a culture-negative hip, fungal infections, and multidrug-resistant organisms, a direct intra-articular infusion of pathogen-sensitive antibiotics was performed postoperatively. Recurrence of infection and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Three patients died and 12 patients (none with known recurrent infection) were lost to follow-up. There were 111 remaining patients (60 male, 51 female) with a mean age of 58.7 (Aims
Patients and Methods
Reconstruction of the acetabulum after failed total hip arthroplasty
(THA) can be a surgical challenge in the presence of severe bone
loss. We report the long-term survival of a porous tantalum revision
acetabular component, its radiological appearance and quality of
life outcomes. We reviewed the results of 46 patients who had undergone revision
of a failed acetabular component with a Paprosky II or III bone
defect and reconstruction with a hemispherical, tantalum acetabular
component, supplementary screws and a cemented polyethylene liner.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims
Patients and Methods
An uncemented hemispherical acetabular component
is the mainstay of acetabular revision and gives excellent long-term
results. Occasionally, the degree of acetabular bone loss means that a
hemispherical component will be unstable when sited in the correct
anatomical location or there is minimal bleeding host bone left
for biological fixation. On these occasions an alternative method
of reconstruction has to be used. A major column structural allograft has been shown to restore
the deficient bone stock to some degree, but it needs to be off-loaded
with a reconstruction cage to prevent collapse of the graft. The
use of porous metal augments is a promising method of overcoming
some of the problems associated with structural allograft. If the defect
is large, the augment needs to be protected by a cage to allow ingrowth
to occur. Cup-cage reconstruction is an effective method of treating
chronic pelvic discontinuity and large contained or uncontained
bone defects. This paper presents the indications, surgical techniques and
outcomes of various methods which use acetabular reconstruction
cages for revision total hip arthroplasty. Cite this article:
The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the minimum
five-year outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using
the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device (KARD) in patients
with Paprosky type III acetabular defects and destruction of the
inferior margin of the acetabulum. We identified 36 patients (37 hips) who underwent revision THA
under these circumstances using the KARD, fresh frozen allograft
femoral heads, and reconstruction of the inferior margin of the
acetabulum. The Merle d’Aubigné system was used for clinical assessment.
Serial anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were used to assess migration
of the acetabular component.Aims
Patients and Methods
We present the results of 62 consecutive acetabular
revisions using impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene
acetabular component in 58 patients (13 men and 45 women) after
a mean follow-up of 27 years (25 to 30). All patients were prospectively
followed. The mean age at revision was 59.2 years (23 to 82). We performed Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis and also a Competing
Risk (CR) analysis because with long-term follow-up, the presence
of a competing event (i.e. death) prevents the occurrence of the
endpoint of re-revision. A total of 48 patients (52 hips) had died or had been re-revised
at final review in March 2011. None of the deaths were related to
the surgery. The mean Harris hip score of the ten surviving hips
in ten patients was 76 points (45 to 99). The KM survivorship at 25 years for the endpoint ‘re-revision
for any reason’ was 58.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 38 to 73)
and for ‘re-revision for aseptic loosening’ 72.1% (95% CI 51 to
85). With the CR analysis we calculated the KM analysis overestimates
the failure rate with respectively 74% and 93% for these endpoints.
The current study shows that acetabular impaction bone grafting
revisions provide good clinical results at over 25 years. Cite this article:
We hypothesised that the use of tantalum (Ta)
acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) was protective
against subsequent failure due to infection. We identified 966 patients
(421 men, 545 women and 990 hips) who had undergone revision THA
between 2000 and 2013. The mean follow up was 40.2 months (3 months
to 13.1 years). The mean age of the men and women was 62.3 years
(31 to 90) and 65.1 years (25 to 92), respectively. Titanium (Ti) acetabular components were used in 536 hips while
Ta components were used in 454 hips. In total, 73 (7.3%) hips experienced
subsequent acetabular failure. The incidence of failure was lower
in the Ta group at 4.4% (20/454) compared with 9.9% (53/536) in
the Ti group (p <
0.001, odds ratio 2.38; 95% CI 1.37 to 4.27).
Among the 144 hips (64 Ta, 80 Ti) for which revision had been performed
because of infection, failure due to a subsequent infection was
lower in the Ta group at 3.1% (2/64) compared with 17.5% (14/80)
for the Ti group (p = 0.006). Thus, the use of Ta acetabular components during revision THA
was associated with a lower incidence of failure from all causes
and Ta components were associated with a lower incidence of subsequent
infection when used in patients with periprosthetic joint infection. Cite this article:
In this retrospective study we evaluated the
proficiency of shelf autograft in the restoration of bone stock
as part of primary total hip replacement (THR) for hip dysplasia,
and in the results of revision arthroplasty after failure of the primary
arthroplasty. Of 146 dysplastic hips treated by THR and a shelf
graft, 43 were revised at an average of 156 months, 34 of which
were suitable for this study (seven hips were excluded because of
insufficient bone-stock data and two hips were excluded because
allograft was used in the primary THR). The acetabular bone stock
of the hips was assessed during revision surgery. The mean implant–bone
contact was 58% (50% to 70%) at primary THR and 78% (40% to 100%)
at the time of the revision, which was a significant improvement
(p <
0.001). At primary THR all hips had had a segmental acetabular
defect >
30%, whereas only five (15%) had significant segmental
bone defects requiring structural support at the time of revision.
In 15 hips (44%) no bone graft or metal augments were used during
revision. A total of 30 hips were eligible for the survival study. At a
mean follow-up of 103 months (27 to 228), two aseptic and two septic
failures had occurred. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the revision
procedures demonstrated a ten-year survival rate of 93.3% (95% confidence
interval (CI) 78 to 107) with clinical or radiological failure as
the endpoint. The mean Oxford hip score was 38.7 (26 to 46) for
non-revised cases at final follow-up. Our results indicate that the use of shelf autografts during
THR for dysplastic hips restores bone stock, contributing to the
favourable survival of the revision arthroplasty should the primary
procedure fail. Cite this article:
We report the results of 62 hips in 62 patients
(17 males, 45 females) with mean age of 62.4 years (37 to 81), who underwent
revision of the acetabular component of a total hip replacement
due to aseptic loosening between May 2003 and November 2007. All
hips had a Paprosky type IIIa acetabular defect. Acetabular revision
was undertaken using a Procotyl E cementless oblong implant with
modular side plates and a hook combined with impaction allografting. At a mean follow-up of 60.5 months (36 to 94) with no patients
lost to follow-up and one died due to unrelated illness, the complication
rate was 38.7%. Complications included aseptic loosening (19 hips),
deep infection (3 hips), broken hook and side plate (one hip) and
a femoral nerve palsy (one hip). Further revision of the acetabular component
was required in 18 hips (29.0%) and a further four hips (6.4%) are
currently loose and awaiting revision. We observed unacceptably high rates of complication and failure
in our group of patients and cannot recommend this implant or technique.
Pelvic discontinuity with associated bone loss is a complex challenge in acetabular revision surgery. Reconstruction using ilio-ischial cages combined with trabecular metal acetabular components and morsellised bone (the component-cage technique) is a relatively new method of treatment. We reviewed a consecutive series of 26 cases of acetabular revision reconstructions in 24 patients with pelvic discontinuity who had been treated by the component-cage technique. The mean follow-up was 44.6 months (24 to 68). Failure was defined as migration of a component of >
5 mm. In 23 hips (88.5%) there was no clinical or radiological evidence of loosening at the last follow-up. The mean Harris hip score improved significantly from 46.6 points (29.5 to 68.5) to 76.6 points (55.5 to 92.0) at two years (p <
0.001). In three hips (11.5%) the construct had migrated at one year after operation. The complications included two dislocations, one infection and one partial palsy of the peroneal nerve. Our findings indicate that treatment of pelvic discontinuity using the component-cage construct is a reliable option.
