Orthopaedic and reconstructive surgeons are faced with large defects after the resection of malignant tumours of the sacrum. Spinopelvic reconstruction is advocated for resections above the level of the S1 neural foramina or involving the sacroiliac joint. Fixation may be augmented with either free vascularized fibular flaps (FVFs) or allograft fibular struts (AFSs) in a cathedral style. However, there are no studies comparing these reconstructive techniques. We reviewed 44 patients (23 female, 21 male) with a mean age of 40 years (SD 17), who underwent en bloc sacrectomy for a malignant tumour of the sacrum with a reconstruction using a total (n = 20), subtotal (n = 2), or hemicathedral (n = 25) technique. The reconstructions were supplemented with a FVF in 25 patients (57%) and an AFS in 19 patients (43%). The mean length of the strut graft was 13 cm (SD 4). The mean follow-up was seven years (SD 5).Aims
Methods
Free vascularised fibular grafting has been used for the treatment
of large bony defects for more than 40 years. However, there is
little information about the risk factors for failure and whether
newer locking techniques of fixation improve the rates of union.
The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of union of free
fibular grafts fixed with locking and traditional techniques, and
to quantify the risk factors for nonunion and failure. A retrospective review involved 134 consecutive procedures over
a period of 20 years. Of these, 25 were excluded leaving 109 patients
in the study. There were 66 men and 43 women, with a mean age of
33 years (5 to 78). Most (62) were performed for oncological indications,
and the most common site (52) was the lower limb. Rate of union
was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors for
nonunion were assessed using Cox regression. All patients were followed
up for at least one year.Aims
Patients and Methods
Clinical studies of patients with bone sarcomas have been challenged
by insufficient numbers at individual centres to draw valid conclusions.
Our objective was to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive
multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether
a five-day regimen of post-operative antibiotics, in comparison
to a
24-hour regimen, decreases surgical site infections in patients
undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower extremity primary
bone tumours. We performed a pilot international multi-centre RCT. We used
central randomisation to conceal treatment allocation and sham antibiotics
to blind participants, surgeons, and data collectors. We determined
feasibility by measuring patient enrolment, completeness of follow-up,
and protocol deviations for the antibiotic regimens. Objective
Methods
