Large acetabular bone defects encountered in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) are challenging to restore. Metal constructs for structural support are combined with bone graft materials for restoration. Autograft is restricted due to limited volume, and allogenic grafts have downsides including cost, availability, and operative processing. Bone graft substitutes (BGS) are an attractive alternative if they can demonstrate positive remodelling. One potential product is a biphasic injectable mixture (Cerament) that combines a fast-resorbing material (calcium sulphate) with the highly osteoconductive material hydroxyapatite. This study reviews the application of this biomaterial in large acetabular defects. We performed a retrospective review at a single institution of patients undergoing revision THA by a single surgeon. We identified 49 consecutive patients with large acetabular defects where the biphasic BGS was applied, with no other products added to the BGS. After placement of metallic acetabular implants, the BGS was injected into the remaining bone defects surrounding the new implants. Patients were followed and monitored for functional outcome scores, implant fixation, radiological graft site remodelling, and revision failures.Aims
Methods
We compared the five- to seven-year clinical and radiological results of the metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing with a hybrid total hip arthroplasty in two groups of 54 hips, matched for gender, age, body mass index and activity level. Function was excellent in both groups, as measured by the Oxford hip score, but the Birmingham hip resurfacings had higher University of California at Los Angeles activity scores and better EuroQol quality of life scores. The total hip arthroplasties had a revision or intention-to-revise rate of 8%, and the Birmingham hip resurfacings of 6%. Both groups demonstrated impending failure on surrogate end-points. Of the total hip arthroplasties, 12% had polyethylene wear and osteolysis under observation, and 8% of Birmingham hip resurfacings showed migration of the femoral component. Polyethylene wear was present in 48% of the hybrid hips without osteolysis. Of the femoral components in the Birmingham hip resurfacing group which had not migrated, 66% had radiological changes of unknown significance.
The purpose of this prospective study was to
evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of revision of
the femoral component of a total hip replacement using impaction
bone grafting. Femoral revision with an impacted allograft was performed
on 29 patients (31 hips). In all, 21 hips (68%) had grade III or
IV femoral defects according to the Endo-Klinik classification.
A total of 11 patients (12 hips) died before the ten-year follow-up
period. Of the remaining patients, 18 patients (19 hips) were followed
for 10 to 15 years; three further patients died during this time.
None of the 31 stems underwent further revision of their stem. However,
four stems showed extensive subsidence (>
15 mm). One of these patients
had a femoral fracture that required fixation. Three other patients
had a femoral fracture, two of which required fixation and the other
was treated conservatively. Patients with a femoral fracture and/or
severe subsidence had significantly more grade IV defects (six of
seven hips; p = 0.004). One patient needed a closed reduction for
dislocation. Impaction allografting in revision hip surgery gives good long-term
results for femora with grades I, II and III Endo-Klinik-classified
defects. Extensive subsidence and femoral fractures were seen mainly
in patients with grade IV damaged femora.
We report the long-term results of revision total
hip replacement using femoral impaction allografting with both uncemented
and cemented Freeman femoral components. A standard design of component
was used in both groups, with additional proximal hydroxyapatite
coating in the uncemented group. A total of 33 hips in 30 patients received
an uncemented component and 31 hips in 30 patients a cemented component.
The mean follow-up was 9.8 years (2 to 17) in the uncemented group
and 6.2 years (1 to 11) in the cemented group. Revision procedures
(for all causes) were required in four patients (four hips) in the
uncemented group and in five patients (five hips) in the cemented
group. Harris hip scores improved significantly in both groups and
were maintained independently of the extent of any migration of
the femoral component within the graft or graft–cement mantle.
Conventional treatment of mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis consists of fixation Between October 1984 and December 1995 we treated 16 patients for unilateral mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis by fixation While our clinical data favours conventional treatment, our radiological findings are in support of restoring the anatomy of the proximal femur to avoid or delay the development of femoroacetabular impingement following mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis.