The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a femoral
nerve block and a periarticular infiltration in the management of
early post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A pragmatic, single centre, two arm parallel group, patient blinded,
randomised controlled trial was undertaken. All patients due for
TKA were eligible. Exclusion criteria included contraindications
to the medications involved in the study and patients with a neurological
abnormality of the lower limb. Patients received either a femoral
nerve block with 75 mg of 0.25% levobupivacaine hydrochloride around
the nerve, or periarticular infiltration with 150 mg of 0.25% levobupivacaine
hydrochloride, 10 mg morphine sulphate, 30 mg ketorolac trometamol
and 0.25 mg of adrenaline all diluted with 0.9% saline to make a
volume of 150 ml.Aims
Patients and Methods
Knee joint distraction (KJD) is a relatively new, knee-joint
preserving procedure with the goal of delaying total knee arthroplasty
(TKA) in young and middle-aged patients. We present a randomised
controlled trial comparing the two. The 60 patients ≤ 65 years with end-stage knee osteoarthritis
were randomised to either KJD (n = 20) or TKA (n = 40). Outcomes
were assessed at baseline, three, six, nine, and 12 months. In the
KJD group, the joint space width (JSW) was radiologically assessed,
representing a surrogate marker of cartilage thickness.Aims
Patients and Methods
We wished to compare the clinical outcome, as assessed by questionnaires
and the rate of complications, in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
undertaken with patient-matched positioning guides (PMPGs) or conventional
instruments. A total of 180 patients (74 men, 106 women; mean age 67 years)
were included in a multicentre, adequately powered, double-blind,
randomised controlled trial. The mean follow-up was 44 months (24
to 57).Aims
Patients and Methods
Subtotal or total meniscectomy in the medial or lateral compartment
of the knee results in a high risk of future osteoarthritis. Meniscal
allograft transplantation has been performed for over thirty years
with the scientifically plausible hypothesis that it functions in
a similar way to a native meniscus. It is thought that a meniscal
allograft transplant has a chondroprotective effect, reducing symptoms
and the long-term risk of osteoarthritis. However, this hypothesis has
never been tested in a high-quality study on human participants.
This study aims to address this shortfall by performing a pilot
randomised controlled trial within the context of a comprehensive
cohort study design. Patients will be randomised to receive either meniscal transplant
or a non-operative, personalised knee therapy program. MRIs will
be performed every four months for one year. The primary endpoint
is the mean change in cartilage volume in the weight-bearing area
of the knee at one year post intervention. Secondary outcome measures
include the mean change in cartilage thickness, T2 maps, patient-reported
outcome measures, health economics assessment and complications.Objectives
Methods
We performed a randomised controlled trial comparing
computer-assisted surgery (CAS) with conventional surgery (CONV)
in total knee replacement (TKR). Between 2009 and 2011 a total of
192 patients with a mean age of 68 years (55 to 85) with osteoarthritis
or arthritic disease of the knee were recruited from four Norwegian
hospitals. At three months follow-up, functional results were marginally
better for the CAS group. Mean differences (MD) in favour of CAS
were found for the Knee Society function score (MD: 5.9, 95% confidence
interval (CI) 0.3 to 11.4, p = 0.039), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis
Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales for ‘pain’ (MD: 7.7, 95% CI 1.7 to
13.6, p = 0.012), ‘sports’ (MD: 13.5, 95% CI 5.6 to 21.4, p = 0.001)
and ‘quality of life’ (MD: 7.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 14.3, p = 0.046).
At one-year follow-up, differences favouring CAS were found for
KOOS ‘sports’ (MD: 11.0, 95% CI 3.0 to 19.0, p = 0.007) and KOOS
‘symptoms’ (MD: 6.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 13.0, p = 0.035). The use of
CAS resulted in fewer outliers in frontal alignment (>
3° malalignment),
both for the entire TKR (37.9% Cite this article:
In the absence of patellar resurfacing, we have
previously shown that the use of electrocautery around the margin of
the patella improved the one-year clinical outcome of total knee
replacement (TKR). In this prospective randomised study we compared
the mean 3.7 year (1.1 to 4.2) clinical outcomes of 300 TKRs performed
with and without electrocautery of the patellar rim: this is an
update of a previous report. The overall prevalence of anterior knee
pain was 32% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 26 to 39), and 26% (95%
CI 18 to 35) in the intervention group compared with 38% (95% CI
29 to 48) in the control group (chi-squared test; p = 0.06). The
overall prevalence of anterior knee pain remained unchanged between
the one-year and 3.7 year follow-up (chi-squared test; p = 0.12). The
mean total Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis
Indices and the American Knee Society knee and function scores at
3.7 years’ follow-up were similar in the intervention and control
groups (repeated measures analysis of variance p = 0.43, p = 0.09
and p = 0.59, respectively). There were no complications. A total
of ten patients (intervention group three, control group seven)
required secondary patellar resurfacing after the first year. Our study suggests that the improved clinical outcome with electrocautery
denervation compared with no electrocautery is not maintained at
a mean of 3.7 years’ follow-up. Cite this article:
There is conflicting evidence about the merits
of mobile bearings in total knee replacement, partly because most randomised
controlled trials (RCTs) have not been adequately powered. We report
the results of a multicentre RCT of mobile There was no significant difference between the groups pre-operatively:
mean OKS was 17.18 ( In this appropriately powered RCT, over the first five years
after total knee replacement functional outcomes, re-operation rates
and healthcare costs appear to be the same irrespective of whether
a mobile or fixed bearing is used. Cite this article:
The aim was to assess whether robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) had greater knee-specific outcomes, improved fulfilment of expectations, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction when compared with manual TKA (mTKA). A randomized controlled trial was undertaken (May 2019 to December 2021), and patients were allocated to either mTKA or rTKA. A total of 100 patients were randomized, 50 to each group, of whom 43 rTKA and 38 mTKA patients were available for review at 12 months following surgery. There were no statistically significant preoperative differences between the groups. The minimal clinically important difference in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score was defined as 7.5 points.Aims
Methods
Different methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction
have been described for skeletally immature patients before closure
of the growth plates. However, the outcome and complications following
this treatment remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review
was to analyse the outcome and complications of different techniques
which may be used for reconstruction of the ACL in these patients. We performed a systematic review of the literature according
to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
guidelines. This involved a comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline,
CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase and Google Scholar databases using the
following combinations of keywords, “knee”, “anterior cruciate ligament”,
“reconstruction”, “injury”, “children”, “adolescent”, “skeletally
immature”, “open physis” and “surgery”.Aims
Materials and Methods
The optimum cementing technique for the tibial
component in cemented primary total knee replacement (TKR) remains
controversial. The technique of cementing, the volume of cement
and the penetration are largely dependent on the operator, and hence
large variations can occur. Clinical, experimental and computational
studies have been performed, with conflicting results. Early implant
migration is an indication of loosening. Aseptic loosening is the
most common cause of failure in primary TKR and is the product of
several factors. Sufficient penetration of cement has been shown
to increase implant stability. This review discusses the relevant literature regarding all aspects
of the cementing of the tibial component at primary TKR. Cite this article:
Using meta-analysis we compared the survival and clinical outcomes of cemented and uncemented techniques in primary total knee replacement. We reviewed randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing cemented and uncemented fixation. Our primary outcome was survival of the implant free of aseptic loosening. Our secondary outcome was joint function as measured by the Knee Society score. We identified 15 studies that met our final eligibility criteria. The combined odds ratio for failure of the implant due to aseptic loosening for the uncemented group was 4.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7 to 6.5) (p <
0.0001). Subgroup analysis of data only from randomised controlled trials showed no differences between the groups for odds of aseptic loosening (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 0.55 to 6.40, p = 0.314). The weighted mean difference for the Knee Society score was 0.005 (95% CI −0.26 to 0.26) (p = 0.972). There was improved survival of the cemented compared to uncemented implants, with no statistically significant difference in the mean Knee Society score between groups for all pooled data.
