Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 17 of 17
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 5 | Pages 306 - 308
1 May 2023
Sharrock M Board T

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(5):306–308.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 2 | Pages 111 - 113
1 Feb 2024
Howard A Thomas GER Perry DC


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1203 - 1205
1 Nov 2024
Taylor LA Breslin MA Hendrickson SB Vallier HA Ollivere BJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 9 | Pages 879 - 883
1 Sep 2024
Kayani B Staats K Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1328 - 1330
1 Aug 2021
Gwilym SE Perry DC Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 6 | Pages 655 - 657
1 Jun 2020
Minhas Z Ganau M Thakar C Reynolds J Rothenfluh D Bojanic S Grannum S Chaudhary BR Pyrovolou N Sikander M Bowden G Patel UJ Nnadi C


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 8 | Pages 993 - 994
1 Aug 2007
Graham HK Harvey A

In cerebral palsy, the site and severity of the brain lesion are directly linked to gross motor function and the development of musculoskeletal deformities. The relationship between walking ability and orthopaedic surgery in children with cerebral palsy is not fully understood. The development of new tools such as the Functional Assessment Questionnaire and the Functional Mobility Scale can be used to give new insights on the functional impact of multilevel surgery. These scales are most useful as part of systematic, long-term follow-up


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 12 | Pages 665 - 666
1 Dec 2017
Hamilton DF Giesinger JM Giesinger K


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 5 | Pages 557 - 558
1 May 2018
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 5 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Oct 2017
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 7 | Pages 871 - 874
1 Jul 2015
Breakwell LM Cole AA Birch N Heywood C

The effective capture of outcome measures in the healthcare setting can be traced back to Florence Nightingale’s investigation of the in-patient mortality of soldiers wounded in the Crimean war in the 1850s.

Only relatively recently has the formalised collection of outcomes data into Registries been recognised as valuable in itself.

With the advent of surgeon league tables and a move towards value based health care, individuals are being driven to collect, store and interpret data.

Following the success of the National Joint Registry, the British Association of Spine Surgeons instituted the British Spine Registry. Since its launch in 2012, over 650 users representing the whole surgical team have registered and during this time, more than 27 000 patients have been entered onto the database.

There has been significant publicity regarding the collection of outcome measures after surgery, including patient-reported scores. Over 12 000 forms have been directly entered by patients themselves, with many more entered by the surgical teams.

Questions abound: who should have access to the data produced by the Registry and how should they use it? How should the results be reported and in what forum?

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:871–4.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 4, Issue 9 | Pages 152 - 153
1 Sep 2015
Hamilton DF Ghert M Simpson AHRW


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 151
1 Feb 2016
Haddad FS McLawhorn AS

Health economic evaluations potentially provide valuable information to clinicians, health care administrators, and policy makers regarding the financial implications of decisions about the care of patients. The highest quality research should be used to inform decisions that have direct impact on the access to care and the outcome of treatment. However, economic analyses are often complex and use research methods which are relatively unfamiliar to clinicians. Furthermore, health economic data have substantial national, regional, and institutional variability, which can limit the external validity of the results of a study. Therefore, minimum guidelines that aim to standardise the quality and transparency of reporting health economic research have been developed, and instruments are available to assist in the assessment of its quality and the interpretation of results.

The purpose of this editorial is to discuss the principal types of health economic studies, to review the most common instruments for judging the quality of these studies and to describe current reporting guidelines. Recommendations for the submission of these types of studies to The Bone & Joint Journal are provided.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:147–51.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1285 - 1286
1 Oct 2014
Dunbar MJ Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1009 - 1010
1 Aug 2013
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 8 | Pages 997 - 999
1 Aug 2014
Stahel PF Mauffrey C

We explore the limitations of complete reliance on evidence-based medicine which can be diminished by confounding issues and sampling bias. Other strategies which may be reasonably invoked are discussed.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:997–9.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1133 - 1134
1 Sep 2007
Haddad FS Ashby E Konangamparambath S

Due to economic constraints, it has been suggested that joint replacement patients can be followed up in primary care. There are clinical, ethical and academic reasons why we must ensure that our joint replacements are appropriately clinically and radiologically followed up to minimise complications. This Editorial discusses this.