It has been suggested that extracorporeal shockwave
therapy is a safe and effective treatment for pain relief from recalcitrant
plantar fasciopathy (PF). However, the changes in gait and associated
biomechanical parameters have not been well characterised. We recruited
12 female patients with recalcitrant PF who had a mean age of 59
years (50 to 70) and mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2 (22
to 30). The patients reported a mean duration of symptoms of 9.3
months (6 to 15). Shockwave therapy consisting of 1500 impulses
(energy flux density 0.26 mJ/mm2) was applied for three
sessions, each three weeks apart. A pain visual analogue scale (VAS)
rating, plantar pressure assessment and motion analysis were carried
out before and nine weeks after first shock wave therapy. It was demonstrated
that patients increased their walking velocity and cadence as well
indicating a decrease in pain after shockwave therapy. In the symptomatic
foot, the peak contact pressure over the forefoot increased and
the contact area over the digits decreased. The total foot impulse
also decreased as did stance duration. The duration the centre of
pressure remained in the hindfoot increased in the symptomatic foot
after shockwave therapy. The differences in centre of pressure trajectory
at baseline decreased at final follow-up. In conclusion, shockwave
therapy not only decreased the pain VAS rating but also improved
the gait parameters of the symptomatic foot in PF patients. Cite this article:
The October 2023 Sports Roundup360 looks at: Extensor mechanism disruption in the treatment of dislocated and multiligament knee injuries; Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with injection of stem cells; Corticosteroid injection plus exercise or exercise alone as adjuvants for patients with plantar fasciitis?; Generalized joint hypermobility and a second ACL injury?; The VISA-A ((sedentary) questionnaire for Achilles tendinopathy?.
A local injection may be used as an early option in the treatment of Morton’s neuroma, and can be performed using various medications. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of injections of hyaluronic acid compared with corticosteroid in the treatment of this condition. A total of 91 patients were assessed for this trial, of whom 45 were subsequently included and randomized into two groups. One patient was lost to follow-up, leaving 22 patients (24 feet) in each group. The patients in the hyaluronic acid group were treated with three ultrasound-guided injections (one per week) of hyaluronic acid (Osteonil Plus). Those in the corticosteroid group were treated with three ultrasound-guided injections (also one per week) of triamcinolone (Triancil). The patients were evaluated before treatment and at one, three, six, and 12 months after treatment. The primary outcome measure was the visual analogue scale for pain (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and complications.Aims
Methods