Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 10 | Pages 590 - 599
1 Oct 2017
Jefferson L Brealey S Handoll H Keding A Kottam L Sbizzera I Rangan A

Objectives

To explore whether orthopaedic surgeons have adopted the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial results routinely into clinical practice.

Methods

A questionnaire was piloted with six orthopaedic surgeons using a ‘think aloud’ process. The final questionnaire contained 29 items and was distributed online to surgeon members of the British Orthopaedic Association and British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Descriptive statistics summarised the sample characteristics and fracture treatment of respondents overall, and grouped them by whether they changed practice based on PROFHER trial findings. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively for emerging themes using Framework Analysis principles.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 7 | Pages 865 - 874
1 Jul 2012
Mills LA Simpson AHRW

This review is aimed at clinicians appraising preclinical trauma studies and researchers investigating compromised bone healing or novel treatments for fractures. It categorises the clinical scenarios of poor healing of fractures and attempts to match them with the appropriate animal models in the literature.

We performed an extensive literature search of animal models of long bone fracture repair/nonunion and grouped the resulting studies according to the clinical scenario they were attempting to reflect; we then scrutinised them for their reliability and accuracy in reproducing that clinical scenario.

Models for normal fracture repair (primary and secondary), delayed union, nonunion (atrophic and hypertrophic), segmental defects and fractures at risk of impaired healing were identified. Their accuracy in reflecting the clinical scenario ranged greatly and the reliability of reproducing the scenario ranged from 100% to 40%.

It is vital to know the limitations and success of each model when considering its application.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1257 - 1263
1 Sep 2006
Richter M Droste P Goesling T Zech S Krettek C

Different calcaneal plates with locked screws were compared in an experimental model of a calcaneal fracture. Four plate models were tested, three with uniaxially-locked screws (Synthes, Newdeal, Darco), and one with polyaxially-locked screws (90° ± 15°) (Rimbus). Synthetic calcanei were osteotomised to create a fracture model and then fixed with the plates and screws. Seven specimens for each plate model were subjected to cyclic loading (preload 20 N, 1000 cycles at 800 N, 0.75 mm/s), and load to failure (0.75 mm/s).

During cyclic loading, the plate with polyaxially-locked screws (Rimbus) showed significantly lower displacement in the primary loading direction than the plates with uniaxially-locked screws (mean values of maximum displacement during cyclic loading: Rimbus, 3.13 mm (sd 0.68); Synthes, 3.46 mm (sd 1.25); Darco, 4.48 mm (sd 3.17); Newdeal, 5.02 mm (sd 3.79); one-way analysis of variance, p < 0.001).

The increased stability of a plate with polyaxially-locked screws demonstrated during cyclic loading compared with plates with uniaxially-locked screws may be beneficial for clinical use.