Aims. Demineralised bone matrix (DBM) is rarely used for the local
delivery of prophylactic antibiotics. Our aim, in this study, was
to show that a graft with a
Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, to establish whether differences arise in clinical outcomes between autologous and synthetic bone grafts in the operative management of tibial plateau fractures. A structured search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the online archives of Bone & Joint Publishing, and CENTRAL databases from inception until 28 July 2021 was performed. Randomized, controlled, clinical trials that compared autologous and synthetic bone grafts in tibial plateau fractures were included. Preclinical studies, clinical studies in paediatric patients, pathological fractures, fracture nonunion, or chondral defects were excluded. Outcome data were assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) framework and synthesized in random-effect meta-analysis. The Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidance was followed throughout.Aims
Methods
We reviewed 59 bone graft substitutes marketed
by 17 companies currently available for implantation in the United Kingdom,
with the aim of assessing the peer-reviewed literature to facilitate
informed decision-making regarding their use in clinical practice.
After critical analysis of the literature, only 22 products (37%)
had any clinical data. Norian SRS (Synthes), Vitoss (Orthovita),
Cortoss (Orthovita) and Alpha-BSM (Etex) had Level I evidence. We question
the need for so many different products, especially with limited
published clinical evidence for their efficacy, and conclude that
there is a considerable need for further prospective randomised
trials to facilitate informed decision-making with regard to the
use of current and future bone graft substitutes in clinical practice. Cite this article:
A total of 20 patients with a depressed fracture
of the lateral tibial plateau (Schatzker II or III) who would undergo open
reduction and internal fixation were randomised to have the metaphyseal
void in the bone filled with either porous titanium granules or
autograft bone. Radiographs were undertaken within one week, after
six weeks, three months, six months, and after 12 months. The primary outcome measure was recurrent depression of the joint
surface: a secondary outcome was the duration of surgery. The risk of recurrent depression of the joint surface was lower
(p <
0.001) and the operating time less (p <
0.002) when titanium
granules were used. The indication is that it is therefore beneficial to use porous
titanium granules than autograft bone to fill the void created by
reducing a depressed fracture of the lateral tibial plateau. There
is no donor site morbidity, the operating time is shorter and the
risk of recurrent depression of the articular surface is less. Cite this article: