Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 50 of 283
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 4 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Aug 2014
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 2 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Apr 2012
Villar RN


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Feb 2012
Villar RN


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 6 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Dec 2017
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jan 2023
Haddad FS


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 55-B, Issue 4 | Pages 677 - 677
1 Nov 1973
Catterall RCF


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1279 - 1280
1 Dec 2022
Haddad FS


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 81-B, Issue 3 | Pages 377 - 377
1 May 1999
Horan F


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 80-B, Issue 1 | Pages 8 - 8
1 Jan 1998
FULFORD P


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 55-B, Issue 3 | Pages 451 - 452
1 Aug 1973


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 85-B, Issue 6 | Pages 781 - 781
1 Aug 2003
Benson MKD


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jan 2022
Haddad FS


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 79-B, Issue 1 | Pages 108 - 108
1 Jan 1997
Rushton N


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 36-B, Issue 4 | Pages 529 - 529
1 Nov 1954


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 32-B, Issue 4 | Pages 459 - 460
1 Nov 1950
McFarland B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1743 - 1744
1 Dec 2021
Haddad FS


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 58-B, Issue 2 | Pages 153 - 154
1 May 1976
Samilson R


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1429 - 1430
1 Nov 2020
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 6 | Pages 709 - 710
1 Jun 2014
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 2 | Pages 205 - 206
1 Feb 2021
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jan 2021
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jan 2021
Haddad FS


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 53-B, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Feb 1971
Mayer L



The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 34-B, Issue 2 | Pages 338 - 338
1 May 1952
McFarland B


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 38-B, Issue 1 | Pages 435 - 435
1 Feb 1956
Watson-Jones R




The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 5 | Pages 422 - 424
1 May 2024
Theologis T Perry DC

In 2017, the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery engaged the profession and all relevant stakeholders in two formal research prioritization processes. In this editorial, we describe the impact of this prioritization on funding, and how research in children’s orthopaedics, which was until very recently a largely unfunded and under-investigated area, is now flourishing. Establishing research priorities was a crucial step in this process. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5):422–424



The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 6 | Pages 587 - 589
1 Jun 2023
Kunze KN Jang SJ Fullerton MA Vigdorchik JM Haddad FS

The OpenAI chatbot ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence (AI) application that uses state-of-the-art language processing AI. It can perform a vast number of tasks, from writing poetry and explaining complex quantum mechanics, to translating language and writing research articles with a human-like understanding and legitimacy. Since its initial release to the public in November 2022, ChatGPT has garnered considerable attention due to its ability to mimic the patterns of human language, and it has attracted billion-dollar investments from Microsoft and PricewaterhouseCoopers. The scope of ChatGPT and other large language models appears infinite, but there are several important limitations. This editorial provides an introduction to the basic functionality of ChatGPT and other large language models, their current applications and limitations, and the associated implications for clinical practice and research. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(6):587–589


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1292 - 1303
1 Dec 2022
Polisetty TS Jain S Pang M Karnuta JM Vigdorchik JM Nawabi DH Wyles CC Ramkumar PN

Literature surrounding artificial intelligence (AI)-related applications for hip and knee arthroplasty has proliferated. However, meaningful advances that fundamentally transform the practice and delivery of joint arthroplasty are yet to be realized, despite the broad range of applications as we continue to search for meaningful and appropriate use of AI. AI literature in hip and knee arthroplasty between 2018 and 2021 regarding image-based analyses, value-based care, remote patient monitoring, and augmented reality was reviewed. Concerns surrounding meaningful use and appropriate methodological approaches of AI in joint arthroplasty research are summarized. Of the 233 AI-related orthopaedics articles published, 178 (76%) constituted original research, while the rest consisted of editorials or reviews. A total of 52% of original AI-related research concerns hip and knee arthroplasty (n = 92), and a narrative review is described. Three studies were externally validated. Pitfalls surrounding present-day research include conflating vernacular (“AI/machine learning”), repackaging limited registry data, prematurely releasing internally validated prediction models, appraising model architecture instead of inputted data, withholding code, and evaluating studies using antiquated regression-based guidelines. While AI has been applied to a variety of hip and knee arthroplasty applications with limited clinical impact, the future remains promising if the question is meaningful, the methodology is rigorous and transparent, the data are rich, and the model is externally validated. Simple checkpoints for meaningful AI adoption include ensuring applications focus on: administrative support over clinical evaluation and management; necessity of the advanced model; and the novelty of the question being answered. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1292–1303




Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 6 | Pages 342 - 345
1 Jun 2022
Hall AJ Clement ND MacLullich AMJ Simpson AHRW White TO Duckworth AD

Research into COVID-19 has been rapid in response to the dynamic global situation, which has resulted in heterogeneity of methodology and the communication of information. Adherence to reporting standards would improve the quality of evidence presented in future studies, and may ensure that findings could be interpreted in the context of the wider literature. The COVID-19 pandemic remains a dynamic situation, requiring continued assessment of the disease incidence and monitoring for the emergence of viral variants and their transmissibility, virulence, and susceptibility to vaccine-induced immunity. More work is needed to assess the long-term impact of COVID-19 infection on patients who sustain a hip fracture. The International Multicentre Project Auditing COVID-19 in Trauma & Orthopaedics (IMPACT) formed the largest multicentre collaborative audit conducted in orthopaedics in order to provide an emergency response to a global pandemic, but this was in the context of many vital established audit services being disrupted at an early stage, and it is crucial that these resources are protected during future health crises. Rapid data-sharing between regions should be developed, with wider adoption of the revised 2022 Fragility Fracture Network Minimum Common Data Set for Hip Fracture Audit, and a pragmatic approach to information governance processes in order to facilitate cooperation and meta-audit. This editorial aims to: 1) identify issues related to COVID-19 that require further research; 2) suggest reporting standards for studies of COVID-19 and other communicable diseases; 3) consider the requirement of new risk scores for hip fracture patients; and 4) present the lessons learned from IMPACT in order to inform future collaborative studies. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(6):342–345


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 2 | Pages 134 - 136
1 Feb 2021
Im G

The high prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA), as well as the current lack of disease-modifying drugs for OA, has provided a rationale for regenerative medicine as a possible treatment modality for OA treatment. In this editorial, the current status of regenerative medicine in OA including stem cells, exosomes, and genes is summarized along with the author’s perspectives. Despite a tremendous interest, so far there is very little evidence proving the efficacy of this modality for clinical application. As symptomatic relief is not sufficient to justify the high cost associated with regenerative medicine, definitive structural improvement that would last for years or decades and obviate or delay the need for joint arthroplasty is essential for regenerative medicine to retain a place among OA treatment methods. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(2):134–136



Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 12 | Pages 604 - 607
1 Dec 2019
Konan S Abdel MP Haddad FS

There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusively on the chronological age of the patient. This editorial focuses on the literature-based arguments to support the use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), while addressing potential concerns surrounding safety and cost-effectiveness. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(12):604–607


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 4 | Pages 19 - 21
1 Aug 2014

The August 2014 Wrist & Hand Roundup360 looks at: Trapeziectomy superior to arthrodesis;Tamoxifen beneficial in the short term; Semi-occlusive dressing “the bee’s knees” even with exposed bone; “Open” a relative concept in the hand and wrist; Editorial decisions pushing up standards of reporting; Ulnar variance revisited; Traditionalists are traditional; Diabetes not so bad with carpal tunnel


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1575 - 1577
1 Dec 2014
Perry DC Parsons N Costa ML

The extent and depth of routine health care data are growing at an ever-increasing rate, forming huge repositories of information. These repositories can answer a vast array of questions. However, an understanding of the purpose of the dataset used and the quality of the data collected are paramount to determine the reliability of the result obtained. . This Editorial describes the importance of adherence to sound methodological principles in the reporting and publication of research using ‘big’ data, with a suggested reporting framework for future Bone & Joint Journal submissions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1575–7


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 2 | Pages 276 - 280
1 Feb 2012
Buijze GA Weening AA Poolman RW Bhandari M Ring D

Using inaccurate quotations can propagate misleading information, which might affect the management of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of quotation inaccuracy in the peer-reviewed orthopaedic literature related to the scaphoid. We randomly selected 100 papers from ten orthopaedic journals. All references were retrieved in full text when available or otherwise excluded. Two observers independently rated all quotations from the selected papers by comparing the claims made by the authors with the data and expressed opinions of the reference source. A statistical analysis determined which article-related factors were predictors of quotation inaccuracy. The mean total inaccuracy rate of the 3840 verified quotes was 7.6%. There was no correlation between the rate of inaccuracy and the impact factor of the journal. Multivariable analysis identified the journal and the type of study (clinical, biomechanical, methodological, case report or review) as important predictors of the total quotation inaccuracy rate. We concluded that inaccurate quotations in the peer-reviewed orthopaedic literature related to the scaphoid were common and slightly more so for certain journals and certain study types. Authors, reviewers and editorial staff play an important role in reducing this inaccuracy


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 151
1 Feb 2016
Haddad FS McLawhorn AS

Health economic evaluations potentially provide valuable information to clinicians, health care administrators, and policy makers regarding the financial implications of decisions about the care of patients. The highest quality research should be used to inform decisions that have direct impact on the access to care and the outcome of treatment. However, economic analyses are often complex and use research methods which are relatively unfamiliar to clinicians. Furthermore, health economic data have substantial national, regional, and institutional variability, which can limit the external validity of the results of a study. Therefore, minimum guidelines that aim to standardise the quality and transparency of reporting health economic research have been developed, and instruments are available to assist in the assessment of its quality and the interpretation of results. The purpose of this editorial is to discuss the principal types of health economic studies, to review the most common instruments for judging the quality of these studies and to describe current reporting guidelines. Recommendations for the submission of these types of studies to The Bone & Joint Journal are provided. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:147–51


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 2 | Pages 125 - 126
1 Feb 2008
Smith R

The application and interpretation of the impact factor of a journal is fraught with problems, some of which are explored in this editorial


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jan 2015
Haddad FS McCaskie AW

Trauma and Orthopaedic care has been through a rapid evolution over the past few decades. This Editorial discusses some of the advances. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1–2


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 4 | Pages 341 - 342
15 Mar 2023
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 11 | Pages 953 - 961
1 Nov 2024
Mew LE Heaslip V Immins T Ramasamy A Wainwright TW

Aims

The evidence base within trauma and orthopaedics has traditionally favoured quantitative research methodologies. Qualitative research can provide unique insights which illuminate patient experiences and perceptions of care. Qualitative methods reveal the subjective narratives of patients that are not captured by quantitative data, providing a more comprehensive understanding of patient-centred care. The aim of this study is to quantify the level of qualitative research within the orthopaedic literature.

Methods

A bibliometric search of journals’ online archives and multiple databases was undertaken in March 2024, to identify articles using qualitative research methods in the top 12 trauma and orthopaedic journals based on the 2023 impact factor and SCImago rating. The bibliometric search was conducted and reported in accordance with the preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO).


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 6 | Pages 585 - 586
17 Apr 2023
Leopold SS Haddad FS Sandell LJ Swiontkowski M


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 5 | Pages 569 - 570
1 May 2011
Wylde V Blom AW

This editorial considers the shortcomings of assessing outcome after joint replacement only by the survival of the implant


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 5 | Pages 571 - 571
1 May 2011
Faux JC

This year is the centenary of the birth of John Charnley. Some of his legacy to Orthopaedic Surgery is described in this editorial


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1233 - 1234
1 Dec 2023
Haddad FS