Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 128
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 7 | Pages 991 - 991
1 Jul 2007
Maffulli N


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1676 - 1676
1 Dec 2007
Batt ME


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 2 | Pages 264 - 264
1 Feb 2008
Bollen S


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 82-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1209 - 1209
1 Nov 2000


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 82-B, Issue 1 | Pages 154 - 154
1 Jan 2000
King JB


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 6 | Pages 843 - 843
1 Jun 2009
Galasko C


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 2 | Pages 311 - 311
1 Mar 2001
Staker P


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 79-B, Issue 4 | Pages 699 - 699
1 Jul 1997
Motto S


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 85-B, Issue 3 | Pages 466 - 466
1 Apr 2003
Laurence M


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 2 | Pages 310 - 310
1 Mar 2002
Maffulli N


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 79-B, Issue 5 | Pages 883 - 884
1 Sep 1997
Parry JL


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 79-B, Issue 4 | Pages 699 - 699
1 Jul 1997
King J


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 5 | Pages 857 - 857
1 Sep 1996
Laurence M


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 4 | Pages 568 - 568
1 Apr 2011
Haddad F


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 1 | Pages 152 - 152
1 Jan 2002
Irani MS


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 86-B, Issue 1 | Pages 152 - 153
1 Jan 2004
Klenerman L


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 5 | Pages 419 - 425
20 May 2024
Gardner EC Cheng R Moran J Summer LC Emsbo CB Gallagher RG Gong J Fishman FG

Aims

The purpose of this survey study was to examine the demographic and lifestyle factors of women currently in orthopaedic surgery.

Methods

An electronic survey was conducted of practising female orthopaedic surgeons based in the USA through both the Ruth Jackson Society and the online Facebook group “Women of Orthopaedics”.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1361 - 1362
1 Dec 2024
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 3, Issue 10 | Pages 826 - 831
28 Oct 2022
Jukes C Dirckx M Bellringer S Chaundy W Phadnis J

Aims

The conventionally described mechanism of distal biceps tendon rupture (DBTR) is of a ‘considerable extension force suddenly applied to a resisting, actively flexed forearm’. This has been commonly paraphrased as an ‘eccentric contracture to a flexed elbow’. Both definitions have been frequently used in the literature with little objective analysis or citation. The aim of the present study was to use video footage of real time distal biceps ruptures to revisit and objectively define the mechanism of injury.

Methods

An online search identified 61 videos reporting a DBTR. Videos were independently reviewed by three surgeons to assess forearm rotation, elbow flexion, shoulder position, and type of muscle contraction being exerted at the time of rupture. Prospective data on mechanism of injury and arm position was also collected concurrently for 22 consecutive patients diagnosed with an acute DBTR in order to corroborate the video analysis.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 11 | Pages 984 - 991
6 Nov 2024
Molloy T Gompels B McDonnell S

Aims. This Delphi study assessed the challenges of diagnosing soft-tissue knee injuries (STKIs) in acute settings among orthopaedic healthcare stakeholders. Methods. This modified e-Delphi study consisted of three rounds and involved 32 orthopaedic healthcare stakeholders, including physiotherapists, emergency nurse practitioners, sports medicine physicians, radiologists, orthopaedic registrars, and orthopaedic consultants. The perceived importance of diagnostic components relevant to STKIs included patient and external risk factors, clinical signs and symptoms, special clinical tests, and diagnostic imaging methods. Each round required scoring and ranking various items on a ten-point Likert scale. The items were refined as each round progressed. The study produced rankings of perceived importance across the various diagnostic components. Results. In Round 1, the study revealed widespread variability in stakeholder opinions on diagnostic components of STKIs. Round 2 identified patterns in the perceived importance of specific items within each diagnostic component. Round 3 produced rankings of perceived item importance within each diagnostic component. Noteworthy findings include the challenges associated with accurate and readily available diagnostic methods in acute care settings, the consistent acknowledgment of the importance of adopting a patient-centred approach to diagnosis, and the transition from divergent to convergent opinions between Rounds 2 and 3. Conclusion. This study highlights the potential for a paradigm shift in acute STKI diagnosis, where variability in the understanding of STKI diagnostic components may be addressed by establishing a uniform, evidence-based framework for evaluating these injuries. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(11):984–991