Aims. The purpose of this study was to determine the weightbearing practice of operatively managed fragility fractures in the setting of publically funded health services in the UK and Ireland. Methods. The
Conventional methods of treating ankle fractures
in the elderly are associated with high rates of complication. We describe
the results of treating these injuries in 48 frail elderly patients
with a long calcaneotalotibial nail. The mean age of the group was 82 years (61 to 96) and 41 (85%)
were women. All were frail, with multiple medical comorbidities
and their mean American Society of Anaesthesiologists score was
3 (3 to 4). None could walk independently before their operation.
All the fractures were displaced and unstable; the majority (94%,
45 of 48) were low-energy injuries and 40% (19 of 48) were open. The overall mortality at six months was 35%. Of the surviving
patients, 90% returned to their pre-injury level of function. The
mean pre- and post-operative Olerud and Molander questionnaire scores
were 62 and 57 respectively. Complications included superficial
infection (4%, two of 48); deep infection (2%, one of 48); a broken
or loose distal locking screw (6%, three of 48); valgus malunion
(4%, two of 48); and one below-knee amputation following an unsuccessful
vascular operation. There were no cases of nonunion, nail breakage
or peri-prosthetic fracture. A calcaneotalotibial nail is an excellent device for treating
an unstable fracture of the ankle in the frail elderly patient.
It allows the patient to mobilise immediately and minimises the
risk of bone or wound problems. A long nail which crosses the isthmus
of the tibia avoids the risk of peri-prosthetic fracture associated
with shorter devices. Cite this article:
In light of the growing number of elderly osteopenic
patients with distal humeral fractures, we discuss the history of
their management and current trends. Under most circumstances operative
fixation and early mobilisation is the treatment of choice, as it
gives the best results. The relative indications for and results
of total elbow replacement
The effect of the gut microbiota (GM) and its metabolite on bone health is termed the gut-bone axis. Multiple studies have elucidated the mechanisms but findings vary greatly. A systematic review was performed to analyze current animal models and explore the effect of GM on bone. Literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase databases. Information on the types and strains of animals, induction of osteoporosis, intervention strategies, determination of GM, assessment on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone quality, and key findings were extracted.Aims
Methods
This multicentre prospective clinical trial aimed
to determine whether early administration of alendronate (ALN) delays
fracture healing after surgical treatment of fractures of the distal
radius. The study population comprised 80 patients (four men and
76 women) with a mean age of 70 years (52 to 86) with acute fragility
fractures of the distal radius requiring open reduction and internal
fixation with a volar locking plate and screws. Two groups of 40 patients
each were randomly allocated either to receive once weekly oral
ALN administration (35 mg) within a few days after surgery and continued
for six months, or oral ALN administration delayed until four months
after surgery. Postero-anterior and lateral radiographs of the affected
wrist were taken monthly for six months after surgery. No differences
between groups was observed with regard to gender (p = 1.0), age
(p = 0.916), fracture classification (p = 0.274) or bone mineral
density measured at the spine (p = 0.714). The radiographs were
assessed by three independent assessors. There were no significant
differences in the mean time to complete cortical bridging observed
between the ALN group (3.5 months ( Cite this article:
Osteoporosis is common and the health and financial
cost of fragility fractures is considerable. The burden of cardiovascular
disease has been reduced dramatically by identifying and targeting
those most at risk. A similar approach is potentially possible in
the context of fragility fractures. The World Health Organization
created and endorsed the use of FRAX, a fracture risk assessment
tool, which uses selected risk factors to calculate a quantitative,
patient-specific, ten-year risk of sustaining a fragility fracture.
Treatment can thus be based on this as well as on measured bone
mineral density. It may also be used to determine at-risk individuals,
who should undergo bone densitometry. FRAX has been incorporated
into the national osteoporosis guidelines of countries in the Americas,
Europe, the Far East and Australasia. The United Kingdom National
Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence also advocates its
use in their guidance on the assessment of the risk of fragility
fracture, and it may become an important tool to combat the health
challenges posed by fragility fractures.
Hypovitaminosis D has been identified as a common
risk factor for fragility fractures and poor fracture healing. Epidemiological
data on vitamin D deficiency have been gathered in various populations,
but the association between vertebral fragility fractures and hypovitaminosis
D, especially in males, remains unclear. The purpose of this study
was to evaluate serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH D) in
patients presenting with vertebral fragility fractures and to determine
whether patients with a vertebral fracture were at greater risk
of hypovitaminosis D than a control population. Furthermore, we
studied the seasonal variations in the serum vitamin D levels of
tested patients in order to clarify the relationship between other
known risk factors for osteoporosis and vitamin D levels. We measured
the serum 25-OH D levels of 246 patients admitted with vertebral
fractures (105 men, 141 female, mean age 69 years, Cite this article:
Aims. National hip fracture registries audit similar aspects of care but there is variation in the actual data collected; these differences restrict international comparison, benchmarking, and research. The
Aims. The aim of this study was to explore current use of the Global
Using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register,
8639 cemented and 2477 uncemented primary hemiarthroplasties for
displaced fractures of the femoral neck in patients aged > 70 years
were included in a prospective observational study. A total of 218
re-operations were performed after cemented and 128 after uncemented
procedures. Survival of the hemiarthroplasties was calculated using
the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard rate ratios (HRR) for revision
were calculated using Cox regression analyses. At five years the
implant survival was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97 to 97)
for cemented and 91% (95% CI 87 to 94) for uncemented hemiarthroplasties.
Uncemented hemiarthroplasties had a 2.1 times increased risk of
revision compared with cemented prostheses (95% confidence interval
1.7 to 2.6, p < 0.001). The increased risk was mainly caused
by revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (HRR = 17), aseptic loosening
(HRR = 17), haematoma formation (HRR = 5.3), superficial infection
(HRR = 4.6) and dislocation (HRR = 1.8). More intra-operative complications,
including intra-operative death, were reported for the cemented
hemiarthroplasties. However, in a time-dependent analysis, the HRR
for re-operation in both groups increased as follow-up increased. This study showed that the risk for revision was higher for uncemented
than for cemented hemiarthroplasties.
Research into COVID-19 has been rapid in response to the dynamic global situation, which has resulted in heterogeneity of methodology and the communication of information. Adherence to reporting standards would improve the quality of evidence presented in future studies, and may ensure that findings could be interpreted in the context of the wider literature. The COVID-19 pandemic remains a dynamic situation, requiring continued assessment of the disease incidence and monitoring for the emergence of viral variants and their transmissibility, virulence, and susceptibility to vaccine-induced immunity. More work is needed to assess the long-term impact of COVID-19 infection on patients who sustain a hip fracture. The International Multicentre Project Auditing COVID-19 in Trauma & Orthopaedics (IMPACT) formed the largest multicentre collaborative audit conducted in orthopaedics in order to provide an emergency response to a global pandemic, but this was in the context of many vital established audit services being disrupted at an early stage, and it is crucial that these resources are protected during future health crises. Rapid data-sharing between regions should be developed, with wider adoption of the revised 2022
Aims. To identify factors influencing clinicians’ decisions to undertake a nonoperative hip fracture management approach among older people, and to determine whether there is global heterogeneity regarding these factors between clinicians from high-income countries (HIC) and low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Methods. A SurveyMonkey questionnaire was electronically distributed to clinicians around the world through the
Weightbearing instructions after musculoskeletal injury or orthopaedic surgery are a key aspect of the rehabilitation pathway and prescription. The terminology used to describe the weightbearing status of the patient is variable; many different terms are used, and there is recognition and evidence that the lack of standardized terminology contributes to confusion in practice. A consensus exercise was conducted involving all the major stakeholders in the patient journey for those with musculoskeletal injury. The consensus exercise primary aim was to seek agreement on a standardized set of terminology for weightbearing instructions.Aims
Methods
Musculoskeletal diseases are having a growing impact worldwide. It is therefore crucial to have an evidence base to most effectively and efficiently implement future health services across different healthcare systems. International trials are an opportunity to address these challenges and have many potential benefits. They are, however, complex to set up and deliver, which may impact on the efficient and timely delivery of a project. There are a number of models of how international trials are currently being delivered across a range of orthopaedic patient populations, which are discussed here. The examples given highlight that the key to overcoming these challenges is the development of trusted and equal partnerships with collaborators in each country. International trials have the potential to address a global burden of disease, and in turn optimize the benefit to patients in the collaborating countries and those with similar health services and care systems. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to describe the current pathways of care for patients with a fracture of the hip in five low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) in South Asia (Nepal and Sri Lanka) and Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines). The World Health Organization Service Availability and Readiness Assessment tool was used to collect data on the care of hip fractures in Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Nepal. Respondents were asked to provide details about the current pathway of care for patients with hip fracture, including pre-hospital transport, time to admission, time to surgery, and time to weightbearing, along with healthcare professionals involved at different stages of care, information on discharge, and patient follow-up.Aims
Methods