The aim of the study was to develop a quantitative scoring system
to predict whether a large-to-massive rotator cuff tear was arthroscopically
reparable prior to surgery. We conducted a retrospective review of the pre-operative MR imaging
and surgical records of 87 patients (87 shoulders) who underwent
arthroscopic repair of a large-to-massive rotator cuff tear. Patients
were divided into two groups, based on the surgical outcome of the
repair. Of the 87 patients, 53 underwent complete repair (Group
I) and 34 an incomplete repair (Group II). Pre-operative MR images
were reviewed to quantify several variables. Between-group differences
were evaluated and multiple logistic regression analysis was used
to calculate the predictive value of significant variables. The
reparability index (RI) was constructed using the odds ratios of
significant variables and a receiver operating characteristic curve
analysis performed to identify the optimal RI cutoff to differentiate
between the two groups.Aims
Patients and Methods
The outcome of an anatomical shoulder replacement
depends on an intact rotator cuff. In 1981 Grammont designed a novel
large-head reverse shoulder replacement for patients with cuff deficiency.
Such has been the success of this replacement that it has led to
a rapid expansion of the indications. We performed a systematic
review of the literature to evaluate the functional outcome of each
indication for the reverse shoulder replacement. Secondary outcome
measures of range of movement, pain scores and complication rates
are also presented.
