Surgical limb sparing for knee-bearing paediatric bone sarcoma is considered to have a clinically significant influence on postoperative function due to complications and leg-length discrepancies. However, researchers have not fully evaluated the long-term postoperative functional outcomes. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to elucidate the risk factors and long-term functional prognosis associated with paediatric limb-sparing surgery. We reviewed 40 patients aged under 14 years who underwent limb-sparing surgery for knee bone sarcoma (15 cases in the proximal tibia and 25 in the distal femur) between January 2000 and December 2013, and were followed up for a minimum of five years. A total of 35 patients underwent reconstruction using artificial materials, and five underwent biological reconstruction. We evaluated the patients’ postoperative complications, survival rate of reconstruction material, and limb, limb function, and leg-length discrepancy at the final follow-up, as well as the risk factors for each.Aims
Methods
Aseptic loosening is a major cause of failure in cemented endoprosthetic reconstructions. This paper presents the long-term outcomes of a custom-designed cross-pin fixation construct designed to minimize rotational stress and subsequent aseptic loosening in selected patients. The paper will also examine the long-term survivorship and modes of failure when using this technique. A review of 658 consecutive, prospectively collected cemented endoprosthetic reconstructions for oncological diagnoses at a single centre between 1980 and 2017 was performed. A total of 51 patients were identified with 56 endoprosthetic implants with cross-pin fixation, 21 of which were implanted following primary resection of tumour. Locations included distal femoral (n = 36), proximal femoral (n = 7), intercalary (n = 6), proximal humeral (n = 3), proximal tibial (n = 3), and distal humeral (n = 1).Aims
Patients and Methods
The use of a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis in the management
of primary bone tumours in children is well established. However,
the efficacy of such a prosthesis in those requiring a revision
procedure has yet to be established. The aim of this series was
to present our results using extendable prostheses for the revision
of previous endoprostheses. All patients who had a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis inserted
at the time of a revision procedure were identified from our database.
A total of 21 patients (seven female patients, 14 male) with a mean
age of 20.4 years (10 to 41) at the time of revision were included.
The indications for revision were mechanical failure, trauma or infection
with a residual leg-length discrepancy. The mean follow-up was 70
months (17 to 128). The mean shortening prior to revision was 44 mm
(10 to 100). Lengthening was performed in all but one patient with
a mean lengthening of 51 mm (5 to 140).Aims
Patients and Methods
We determined the efficacy of a devitalised autograft
(n = 13) and allograft (n = 16) cortical strut bone graft combined
with long-stem endoprosthetic reconstruction in the treatment of
massive tumours of the lower limb. A total of 29 patients (18 men:11
women, mean age 20.1 years (12 to 45) with a ratio of length of
resection to that of the whole prosthesis of >
50% were treated
between May 2003 and May 2012. The mean follow-up was 47 months
(15 to 132). The stem of the prosthesis was introduced through bone
graft struts filled with cement, then cemented into the residual
bone. Bone healing was achieved in 23 patients (86%). The mean Musculoskeletal
Tumour Society functional score was 85% (57 to 97). The five-year
survival rate of the endoprostheses was 81% (95% confidence intervals
67.3 to 92.3). The mean length of devitalised autografts and allografts
was 8.6 cm (5 to 15), which increased the ratio of the the length
of the stem of the prosthesis to that of the whole length of the
prosthesis from a theoretical 35% to an actual 55%. . Cortical strut bone grafting and long-stem endoprosthetic reconstruction
is an option for treating massive segmental defects following resection
of a tumour in the lower limb. Patients can regain good function
with a low incidence of aseptic loosening. The strut graft and the
residual bone together serve as a satisfactory bony environment
for a
